The Future is Now

I really, really hope I’m wrong about this, but it feels to me like Trump is going to be president again. The election is still 16 months away and, of course, anything might happen between now and then. But even if he doesn’t win, Congress is behaving as if he has won already. They’re obeying in advance.

This week, the Republican controlled House has presaged the coming Revenge Administration with two unbelievably cowardly and weak actions, more about which momentarily.

First, a word on why I think Tweety redux, or maybe I should say “Truthy” redux, is in the offing. His path to the nomination is clear to me – the script is the same as it was in 2016. His mesmerized and cast-in-concrete base is, say, 40% of Republican primary voters. OK, you say, so that leaves 60% who will vote against him.

Not so fast.

If there are 16 other Republican candidates, as there were in 2016, they would have to split that 60% between them, and also split the potential donor and PAC money between them. Trump would pick them off one by one as he did with Little Marco, Lyin’ Ted, Low Energy Jeb, Horseface Carly, and so on. But this time is different, you say, since the Super-Pacs and Dark Money forces have already come out against him, and have already run attack ads.

Well, that’s a ray of hope, I guess, but Trump doesn’t need ads and isn’t particularly hurt by them. He has social media, crazy right wing media, and “lamestream media” all to himself, each salivating to give him as much free air as he wants any time he feels like calling for the end of the constitution or referring to the Biden “crime family”. “All Trump All The Time” is their motto whenever he wants it to be. They haven’t learned a thing except Trump = ratings = dollars.

Moreover, attacking Trump is the wrong way to spend your money. The right way would be to pick an alternative and pump that person up. The anti-Trump forces haven’t done that yet, and the longer they wait, the harder it will be.

But he can’t win the general election, you’ll say. He’s a loser as everyone knows and all those independents, suburban and country-club Republicans, and Trump-haters of every ilk will stop him. Are you sure? Remember, you all said the same thing in 2016. And in 2020, it was only his mis-handling of Covid along with the usual throw-the-bums-out anti-incumbent sentiment that just barely got rid of him. And even then we almost had to have a civil war to show him the door.

I say “barely” got rid of him because, although he lost the popular vote by 7 million, it’s only the ridiculous Electoral College that matters. If he had only won Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin, each of which was lost by the tiniest of margins, he would have retained office. Fun fact: Biden did not get 50% of the vote in any of those three states.

And Trump will have had four years of lying and bullying to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Election deniers have been promoted, emboldened and very nearly elected to state-wide office in Arizona. In Georgia, intimidation and voter-registration laws might be the difference this time. And in Wisconsin, well, the usual throw-the-bums-out anti-incumbent sentiment might just do it. They’re asking themselves right now, “Do we really want to see President Kamala Harris any time soon?” And if not Wisconsin, maybe Pennsylvania or Michigan, which could also be up for grabs.

And if the worst happens in November 2024? Trump’s obsession and over-arching policy will be to destroy the “deep state”, i.e. anyone drawing a federal paycheck who is a registered Democrat or even a Republican who has not sufficiently praised him. Or one that has perhaps implied at some point that Biden did actually win in 2020. This will be the first step toward achieving the Trumpublican dream of a one-party state beholden to its Supreme Leader.

This brings me back to the cowardly and despicable Republican House, which is already deeply in fear of the coming purge and feels compelled to show its loyally to the Truthy agenda now, so as to try to save their skins two years from now. They’ve obeyed in advance.

On Wednesday the House censured Adam Schiff for leading the first impeachment prosecution. Schiff also served on the committee investigating the January 6, 2021 insurrection, and has been in Trump’s sights for a long time, earning the epithet “Little Adam Schitt”. He had already been kicked off the Intelligence Committee earlier this year by Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Schiff is a truly honorable and courageous man, in my opinion, and this is just a disgrace. In response to the censure, Schiff said, “You honor me with your enmity”.

And on Thursday, House Republicans moved to strip security clearance from any official who signed a 2020 statement suggesting that the release of Hunter Biden’s emails had all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. This list includes more than 50 former intelligence officials, including CIA directors Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta and John Brennan. It’s really unbelievable. And just a quick reminder: the people who are deciding about this “issue” include George Santos, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, and Matt Gaetz, among other leading statesmen.

Twice impeached, indicted by New York State and the Federal Government, head of an organization found guilty of criminal tax fraud, personally found guilty of sexual abuse, and still ahead of his closest rival by 30% in today’s national polling.

It’s clear that we’re never going to be rid of this cancer, and it just might be the end of our current form of government. Trump actually could be president again. It CAN happen here.

For they have sown the wind

… and they shall reap the whirlwind.

So Trump has Covid-19 and we all wish him a speedy recovery.

At least Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden have all made apparently heartfelt declarations to that effect. It makes you wonder what Trump would have said if the shoe were on the other foot and it was, say, Biden who was stricken.

Foxnews, meanwhile, has decried all the hate directed at Trump (apparently there are some on social media who do not wish Trump well), and Twitter has banned posts wishing for Trump’s death on their platform. Not surprisingly, the four members of “The Squad”, who have all been receiving Trump-fueled death threats on Twitter for years are wondering why this policy couldn’t have been invoked for their benefit as well.

As faithful readers of GOML know, yours truly, Stewie Generis, has often railed against Trump and everything he stands for, i.e Trump himself. You might be wondering how I feel about all this. Well, I don’t wish him ill or, actually, anything at all. I simply wish he would go away and let us all get back to life as we knew it Before Tweety. It will take years to repair the damage this guy has wrought on our country, its institutions, and its place in the world. We need to begin as soon as possible.

But you do have to feel something, perhaps pity or scorn, for the many in Trumpworld who have been required to accept the anti-science fantasy that the big boss has been insisting on since February, and who are now also stricken. Some will not recover from this, and some, Herman Cain comes to mind, have already paid with their lives.

But today’s post isn’t about how Trump’s incompetence and narcissism have led us into this entirely predictable and preventable tragedy, or how it is now clear that, until an effective vaccine becomes available to everyone in this country, we can all, every one of us, expect to get sick at some point.

No, today’s message is about how numb we have all become to the many bombshells that have been dropped on us in rapid succession. So many, so fast. And how it’s now as if they never exploded at all.

Just 48 hours before the news dropped that Tweety tested positive for Covid, he managed to completely blow up one of the last institutions of American political life that was still intact – the Presidential Debate.

I had briefly puzzled over reports that he wasn’t “preparing” for the debate at all, while Biden was holed up with experts and documentation trying to get informed on all the issues and policies he needed to think about as president. Then it dawned on me that of course Trump didn’t need to prepare. Preparation is only necessary in a fact-based environment, an environment Trump has little use for and avoids at all times.

His debating strategy is simple: wait for a “keyword” in the question, then interrupt with a fire hose of insults, lies, slander and non-sequiturs. For example, if the question begins, “On the subject of health care and the pandemic…”, Tweety jumps in and does about five minutes of “No one in history has done more for health care than me. Insulin is now free for everyone. It’s beautiful. If Biden had been in charge, millions would be dead by now. One is too many. China, China, CHINA”, and so on. Why would anyone need to prepare for this?

The media went wild about the debate/tantrum for the two days before the Covid diagnosis, but neglected to mention that it had completely erased the previous bombshell that had fallen only the day before: Trump’s tax returns had finally been produced by the Failing New York Times. It was the biggest story in four years but Trump’s “debate” performance cancelled it and now you can’t even remember that it happened.

Doesn’t really matter, though. As soon as the news dropped that Trump wasn’t a successful businessman at all, that he had cheated the U.S. government for years, and that it was only the success of The Apprentice that kept him from personal ruin (and vaulted him to the presidency), he launched the expected rebuttal: it was all fake news and the Times had broken the law in getting the info. Lock them up! Makes you wonder, though, why the Times would need to break the law to generate fake news. Couldn’t they just make up the fakes right there in their own offices without talking to anyone else?

Anyway, the holy grail of Trump’s taxes had been found and, contrary to the fondest hopes of everyone who values democracy and sanity, it had no effect whatsoever. Less even than the Mueller report, for example, which showed clearly the Russians had interfered with the 2016 election and Trump had been complicit, but which was immediately and permanently relegated to the status of “hoax”. Forgot about that one already, didn’t you?

But the tax story did have an important effect. It evaporated any and all memory and interest in the previous week’s bombshell – Bob Woodward’s book, “Rage”, which again outed Trump as the liar he is by revealing tapes of him admitting that he knew the truth about Covid since February, but played it down anyway (resulting in millions of Americans unnecessarily getting sick and hundreds of thousands dying). And also that he thought members of the military were suckers, etc. etc.

Again, none of that would have mattered even if it had gotten more than the week or so of attention it did. Team Trump had already mobilized its response, which boiled down to “So what?”. This torch was carried by a truly ridiculous senator from Louisiana, one John Neely Kennedy, who answered all questions about it by repeating the mantra, “These gotcha books don’t really interest me that much. There will be a new one out tomorrow.” Check it out for a laugh:

Anyway, I just want to forget about all this for at least a few hours. Don’t really feel like waiting for the next bombshell to explode, either.

Fortunately it’s Sunday and that means I can zone out and watch the Patriots. I don’t like their chances much against the brilliant Patrick Mahomes and the Superbowl champion Chiefs, but it’s something to look forward to and might let me temporarily escape the whirlwind. And who knows- with Cam Newton now at quarterback for the Patriots, maybe they can make it interesting.

Wait, what? What’s that you say? Cam has tested positive and the game is postponed?

Ah, shit.

Fuggedaboutit

If anyone reading this thinks Donald Trump will not occupy the oval office on January 21, 2021, they just haven’t been paying attention.  One way or another. Watch.

There’s a scene in ‘Goodfellas’ where the young Henry Hill tells his mob bosses that he can’t work for them any more. His parents got his school report card in the mail, and they want him to concentrate on schoolwork.

If the U.S. Postal Service delivers something the bosses don’t like, solving the problem mob-style is simple: make sure the post office doesn’t deliver any more bad news.  Sound familiar?

We’re now living in a country where everything you do is a referendum on Trump. There is no more objective medical advice or science or even “facts”.  Only what Trump says counts.  If you want to wear a face-mask during the pandemic in the hopes of dodging a bullet, you are signaling disapproval of Trump.  God help you over the next four years (and very likely beyond that) after you’ve taken this “stand”.

Remember those chants of “lock her up”, during the 2016 campaign? You thought that was all theater of the absurd, right? Just a wink-wink clown-show for the rubes, right? Nuh-uh.  Locking up his “enemies” is what Trump surely wants to do for real, and he will shortly be free to start in on the project.  Virtually everyone who doesn’t publicly and loudly worship him is fair game.  Maybe you should have thought more about it before putting on that damned mask?!

The Justice Department is now completely under Trump’s thumb, eager to do his bidding. Is that thumb going to point up or down for you?  Depends.  If you’re “loyal”, you can confess to seven felonies, including threatening the lives of a witness and his dog, and still skate. Step one is to have your already absurdly-light sentence reduced, and step two is a presidential commutation of the sentence before you spend a minute in jail.

stone

On the other hand, if you have an attack of scruples and decide to say something that is actually true about Herr Drumpf, you’re going to prison.  Even if you’ve been his closest confidant and conspirator for decades.  And if someone lets you out early for good behavior or because you’re a high risk for Covid-19 while incarcerated, or for whatever reason, well, that doesn’t matter.  Back you go.  Lock him up.

cohen

And the poor fool in the penal system who thought he was acting on his own authority and just doing his job when he let you out?  Well, he’ll find out soon enough what that kind of “deep state” disloyalty can do to a career.

It should be obvious to everyone at this point that we’ve elected a straight-up mob boss as leader of the free world, and there is absolutely nothing he won’t do to hold on to this position.

Sowing seeds of doubt about the legitimacy of mail-in votes is just Standard Operating Procedure here.  And if mail-in voting has to be stopped because of all the “fraud”, doesn’t in-person voting also have to be stopped?  You haven’t forgotten those millions of illegal votes that were cast for Hillary in 2016 already, have you?

Shhh! Let’s not give anyone any ideas here.

What exactly do you imagine this guy wouldn’t try?  Declaring martial law?  Starting a war?  Assassination?  And, as we’ve said here before, the truly shocking thing is 60 million Americans think it’s all just great.

Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better. If you think life will return to “normal” any time soon, here’s my advice: fuggedaboutit!

 

 

 

Useful Idiot

For years I’ve been asking myself why FoxNews is so enamored with Trump. It seemed to me they could have championed a “normal” conservative who would have given them acceptable Supreme Court Justices, reduced government spending (or greatly inflated it so that the successor administrations would have to slash services and entitlements), provided them with their grotesque tax cuts, and generally indulged in “pro-business” policies regarding trade, environmental regulation, immigration, and so on.

But they chose to blindly support an unhinged sociopath right out of the gate instead.  It seemed to me that FoxNews had put itself in the position of being Trump’s “useful idiot”, i.e. a megaphone propagandizing for a cause without fully comprehending the cause’s goals.

And the cause was simply to fight with “elites” about anything and everything. Who are the “elites”? Academia, the media, science, and government. The spectacle of Trump fighting with virtually every element of government has been baffling over the last few years. Isn’t the President the leader of government? But when you realize that he doesn’t actually care about leading the country or making things better for its citizens or “governing”, you’re on your way to understanding.

As many have pointed out, Trump cares about only one thing: Trump. And the measure of how well he’s taking care of that thing is TV ratings. In his reptilian brain, he has long understood that TV ratings are far, far more important than political polls, or the GNP, or the Dow Jones, or any other measure of success.

vanquish

And Donald trump is a ratings machine, as he never tires of pointing out. People just love to hear what this clown is going to say next. Love him or hate him, it’s hard to take your eyes off him. Tuning in to a CoronaVirus briefing to get the latest? Here ya go: Trump is number one of Facebook! Very nice.

fb

This is a big step towards understanding the Trump-FoxNews connection. Fox is in the business of selling “information” to a particular demographic. Without going into too much detail, let’s just say that demographic resents the elites, so Fox knows what it needs to sell. The more people watch, the better their business model succeeds, and Trump draws the eyeballs to Fox. As President, how can he not? It’s a great relationship for both parties. Whatever Trump wants to put out there, Fox will repeat and amplify and beat to death.

But recently, it finally dawned on me that FoxNews is not Trump’s useful idiot. I had it backwards. It is Trump who is the useful idiot of FoxNews.  As he’ll readily attest, he has a lot of great instincts and, as a very stable genius, is always right. But there’s a lot he doesn’t care about and never gave a second thought to. How can he know what to say about these things? The catch-all strategy has always been to take a strong position on all sides of an issue or just claim you’ve been saying something all along when it becomes clear what will benefit you most.

But there’s a much better way. All he has to do is stay glued to FoxNews all day. He’ll find out what he should say when they say it. The number of times he sees something on Fox and then just minutes later adopts it as a talking point to be repeated endlessly should be zero.  But he does it all the time. Just a couple of examples:

drew

flu

phil

cure

hydro

nyc

Even though Trump has access to the best experts in the world on science, medicine, and virtually everything else, he still gets all his ideas from watching TV. Because TV ratings are the measure of his success and greatness.

And the worst of it is, no one at Foxnews actually believes the nonsense they spew out every day. Internally, they have issued the same guidance as any sane organization would: work at home, reduce face-to-face interviews, maintain social distance, wear masks, and so on. Just like normally-informed, half-way intelligent people.

As John Oliver points out in this brilliant takedown, “They only pretend to believe these things on television for money.” It would be one thing if they believed it themselves and sold it to the rest of us, but to spread dangerous, possibly life-threatening disinformation for money? There oughta be a law.

But at least we have the answer to the riddle of a major “News” organization backing a crazy person. Why back a normal guy who will attempt to lead our country the best he can and give you, say, 75-80% of what you’d like, when you can have a guy who will simply obey your directives 100% of the time?

They’re not following him off a cliff. They’re leading him. For money.

The scorpion and the frog

Trump surprised me the other day. Was it yesterday? Last month?  No one can really keep a time-line anymore. Probably doesn’t matter since everything changes every day and nothing that happens seems connected to any of the other things that happened.

Anyway, he surprised me by announcing that he was going to allow the sun to make its own decisions about whether to rise and set each day, while providing guidance and support from his office. He added that he strongly encouraged more daylight, though  – good for the economy. He said that his administration had been very tough on the sun and had set a fantastic record, with the sun rising and setting on an unbelievably great 35 days in February, resulting in higher ratings for the sun than it had under the Obama administration.

Wait. Just kidding. That wasn’t it.

What did happen was that Tweety announced that he would give the governors permission to decide on their own whether and when to “re-open” their states. This surprised me because I knew he wanted everything to go back to the way it was as soon as possible and to declare victory over Covid-19, and maybe have a parade of tanks or something down Pennsylvania Ave. to celebrate. And I knew he doesn’t like any inference that someone might have some authority that he doesn’t have.

I had been expecting him to make some stupid declaration about how everyone should just stop with the masks already and Make America Great Again.  I even jumped the gun on the morning of his speech by writing about how he was actually going to murder people on 5th Ave., like he said he could a couple of years ago.

Instead, it was one of those very few occasions where Trump appeared “presidential”, struck a somber tone, and delivered a message that was appropriate and apparently based on the advice of experts, even though that advice went counter to his own infallible instincts and infantile desires.

So of course he couldn’t just let it be. It wasn’t broken, so he had to fix it. It only took a couple of hours for him to burst. In a perfect tweet-storm, he contradicted his own newly-minted policy, attacked everyone who seemed not to be worshiping him, re-established his hatred of facts and science and reality, and endangered the lives of millions.

liberate
To no one’s real surprise, the tweets came just minutes after Fox News aired a segment featuring coverage of a Facebook event called “Liberate Minnesota.” Although only a few hundred people expressed interest in the event on Facebook, local news sites and conservative blogs drove attention to the event Thursday, one day before the president’s tweets.

Of course, by now you’ve all read that these three states were hand-picked for the Tweety-treatment because they all have democratic governors running for re-election, and they all have a small number of understandably desperate but misguided people carrying signs in protest of the whole lock-down thing. Neighboring states with the same problems, demographics, and contagion, but with Republican governors, were spared this treatment.

michigan

The above picture is interesting. First, it isn’t much of a “movement” – only a handful of people with signs and a couple of dozen listening. Second, everyone is voluntarily maintaining social distance, despite their objection to the “tyranny”. And last, there seems to be as many people with masks on as not.  Bottom line is this really isn’t something that calls for the President of the United States to go nuts over. I suppose it does make for a decent episode of the highly-rated reality show “The POTUS”, which probably is all the explanation anyone needs.

But the recklessness of Trump’s behavior is really unforgivable. Never mind the blatant politicization of the most serious public health crisis we’ve faced since the polio epidemic of the 1950’s. Never mind that Trump is again purposely turning citizen against citizen and neighbor against neighbor for his own perceived benefit. This stupidity is going to unnecessarily cost more lives. Just when we all agreed to stay in to keep the carnage down, this Manbaby-In-Chief tells us it’s not necessary and not to give in to those democrats and their partners in the lame-stream media that want to ruin our country with their socialist agenda.

And then there’s the whole dog-whistle to the extreme right, anti-vaxxers, and the QAnon conspiracy nuts. This NBC News article talks about it:

“We the people should open up America with civil disobedience and lots of BOOGALOO. Who’s with me?” one QAnon conspiracy theorist on Twitter with over 50,000 followers asked.

“Boogaloo” is a term used by extremists to refer to armed insurrection, a shortened version of “Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo,” which was coined on the extremist message board 4chan.

tweet

The saner voices among us, e.g. Governor Jay Inslee of Washington have it right, but who’s listening to them that hasn’t already figured it out?

Anyway, the whole thing got me thinking again about why the symbols for the two major political parties are the elephant and the donkey. It’s all ancient history and a bit murky. The donkey comes from Andrew Jackson’s 1828 opponents calling him a jackass, and the elephant goes back to the Civil War era, when Lincoln was a “Republican”. Who cares, right?

donkey

We definitely need an update to this iconography. I think the Democrats should adopt the frog as a mascot and the Republicans, now entirely in the death-grip of an unhinged sociopath, should adopt the scorpion.

In the Russian fable of the frog and the scorpion, they both share a common need to cross dangerous waters. The scorpion suggests that the frog let him ride on his back as he swims across. The frog has his doubts, and asks the scorpion for assurances that he won’t sting the frog half-way out. The scorpion points out that if did that, they would both die, so there really isn’t any rational motivation for him to do it.

The frog sees logic in this argument and takes the scorpion on his back. Half way across, the scorpion of course does sting the frog and they both start to drown. The frog screams, “What the Hell? Are you crazy? Now we’re both dead!”. The scorpion says, “What did you expect? I’m a scorpion.”

scorpion

frog

Advice, consent, and history’s rebuke.

Everyone knows that President Tweety loves the Constitution of the U.S., probably more than anyone else. Just before his 2016 inauguration, he told FoxNews (of course), “I feel very strongly about our Constitution. I’m proud of it, I love it and I want to go through the Constitution.”

In a meeting with congressional Republicans at the time, Trump was asked what he would do to protect the Article I powers, i.e. those provisions of the Constitution that define Congress as co-equal to the President and are designed to limit executive overreach.

In retrospect, it is clear that Trump had no idea at all what Article I was.  In the moment, he finessed this by replying,  “I want to protect Article I, Article II, Article XII, going down the list.”  It didn’t really make any difference to anyone then, nor does it now, that the Constitution has only seven articles. There is no Article XII. It might be worth noting, though, that Trump revealed in that moment that he has exactly the same level of respect for the non-existent articles as he does the existent ones. None of them actually matter to him at all.

Section 2, Clause 2 of Article II of the Constitution defines the principle of “Advice and Consent”, which gives the Senate the responsibility to approve treaties and appointments made by the president. Of course, Tweety loves this just as much as the rest of the constitution.  On Wednesday of this week, Trump threatened to force Congress to adjourn so that he may unilaterally install judicial nominees and other officials who would otherwise require Senate confirmation.

As with almost everything Trump does, or insists he has the power to do, the first reaction from most of the people who care about our democracy is, “Can he really do that?”.  And the answer is almost always, “Uh, maybe he can. It’s never been done before, but the courts will have to decide. ” The dilemma is usually not that Trump has invented a new power for himself (though he does that oftentimes as well), but that he has decided to use a power which the founders may have defined, however vaguely, in a way that no one else has ever remotely considered doing before.

So what’s it really all about in this case? Welp, turns out Tweetin’ Donny is unhappy with some of the information coming out of Voice of America, the non-partisan outlet that has been taxpayer-supported for 75 years without much controversy. It’s mission since WWII has been “to tell America’s story” to people around the globe, as there were many areas that only heard state-run anti-American propaganda.

Trump is accusing VOA of spreading Chinese propaganda. “If you hear what’s coming out of the Voice of America, it’s disgusting,” Trump said on Wednesday. “The things they say are disgusting to our country.” Apparently they made the mistake of publishing statistics from China on the Covid-19 infection and death rates in Wuhan.  See, only the Tweeter knows the real numbers, and VOA is all wet.

Trump has wanted his own guy, a documentary film maker named Michael Pack, installed as head of VOA for years, but his nomination has not cleared congress. Some of Pack’s projects include, “Hollywood vs. Religion”, “Campus Culture Wars”, “God and the Inner City”, etc. You get the picture.

Some legislators apparently don’t agree he’s the best guy for the job. Solution? Simple! Shut Congress down. After that? Don’t know. Maybe declare martial Law, cancel the elections, and re-designate the position of President as “Supreme Leader”, or better yet, “Supreme Leader for Life”.

Of course, the story of a president wanting to adjourn congress, which at any other time under any other administration would have been so huge as to have monopolized the news cycle for weeks, flew by virtually unnoticed. And not just because we have a lethal pandemic ongoing, but because it’s so completely, typically, and predictably Trump that it isn’t even news at all.

In fact, I wasn’t even going to mention it myself.  Also I wasn’t going to mention this week’s story about how Trump read a list of about 200 names in the Rose Garden as a response to the criticism that he has mishandled the Covid-19 response. The list included “corporate executives, faith leaders and thought leaders broken out by sector in what the announcement called ‘Great American Economic Revival Industry Groups'”  In other words, it’s a list of who he will blame when things go wrong.

As many have pointed out, Trump does in fact listen to the opinions of others. The way it works is that he first decides the outcome, then solicits the opinions of experts until he finds an “adviser” that hits on the thing he has already decided. Then he backs up the whole charade with a couple of well-placed tweets about how “many people are saying…”, etc.

This is how “advice and consent” actually works now.

Anyway, what really would be the point of offering advice to someone who knows more about the subject than anyone. Here are some of the many things the Very Stable Genius knows more about than anyone else.

genius

The only Republican Senator not included in the new task force was Mitt Romney. As you have now certainly forgotten (and Tweety certainly has not) Romney was the only Republican Senator to vote in favor of one of the two Articles of Impeachment brought against Trump. Nothing personal in Trump’s snubbing of Romney, of course. He’s just trying to get the best possible advice.

At the time of the impeachment vote, Romney said Trump’s actions were “an appalling abuse of public trust.” He said he was comfortable with this vote because what he cared about was what his children and grandchildren would say about him when history is written about this period. He said he had taken an oath, would not let partisan politics get in its way, and did not want to expose himself to history’s rebuke.

 

I could murder people on Fifth Ave…

… and not lose voters. Remember when Tweety said that, early on in his campaign?

We all thought it was hyperbole. Just a figure of speech to highlight how loyal his supporters were, or maybe how mesmerized.

Guess what?

He wasn’t kidding. It wasn’t a figure of speech. Today’s the day. He’s actually going to do it. He’s going to “open the country” even though there is no vaccine to prevent the spread of Covid-19 and no medications to treat it.

New revelations about how completely asymptomatic people can remain infectious for weeks are of no concern to the man-baby. “We’re past the peak”, he will say, as if the threat is over. Doesn’t matter to him that reporting of new cases has slowed because we’re all self-quarantined, and the minute we go back to “normal” it will start up again. What will prevent it? Hydrochloroquine?

Do we have testing in place for everyone? Masks? Protective gear for medical workers? Has anything substantially changed at all in the six weeks since Tweety told us it was all a hoax, like impeachment? That it will all magically disappear in the warm weather? That it was all under perfect control?

It’s not enough for him to simply be incompetent, leaving the heavy lifting to the experts while he impotently pouts in front of Fox and Friends. No, it is his mission to throw gasoline on the fire, sending as many people into the streets as he can. And thinking up new villains to blame for everything while asserting and insisting on his own brilliance.  Yesterday it was the World Health Organization not doing its job. Today it’s that the Chinese invented it in a lab.

As I write this, 31,000 people are dead from Covid-19 in the U.S., and that may be greatly under-reported when you understand that many people are simply dying at home without being “counted”.  By the time you read this, the number will certainly be much higher. As of a week ago, deaths were doubling here every five days. Tweety’s perfect management of this crisis puts us among the worst places in the world to be right now.

You know who’s doing a better job of managing this thing than we are?  Ghana. Burkina Faso. Albania. Azerbaijan. Cameroon. Guyana. Mali. The World.

This chart is updated every day, but at the time of this writing, Coronavirus deaths in the U.S were doubling every five days.

Statistic: Number of days it took for the number of deaths from coronavirus (COVID-19) to double in select countries worldwide as of April 8, 2020 | Statista
Find more statistics at Statista

Authority vs. Responsibility

A commonly heard complaint from managers in large corporations, military officers in the field, school teachers, and myriad others is that they’ve been given the responsibility to get something done but not the authority to do it. They see what the problem is and understand how to fix it, but they’re not allowed to hire or fire the needed people, or spend the needed money, or give the needed orders to others.

If the problem doesn’t get solved, the person who is “responsible” is to blame, and if it does get fixed, then the person with “authority” gets the credit. Most of the people that find themselves in this bind don’t really care about credit or blame – they just want to do their job and achieve a positive outcome. Especially when lives are at stake.

When Brett Crozier, Commanding Officer of an aircraft carrier with over 4000 people under his command, realized that there was a Covid-19 outbreak on the ship and no way to slow contagion in the ship’s close quarters, he knew that the only way to save lives was to off-load the sick for treatment and test and quarantine anyone else who was infected. But he didn’t have the authority to do it.

crozier

He wrote an urgent letter to the Secretary of the Navy outlining what needed to happen, but the letter was “leaked” outside the chain of command. Crozier was relieved from his duties by the acting Naval secretary, Thomas B. Modly, who said Crozier “cracked under pressure”.   Weird how just about everyone in the administration of Donald John Tweety Trump is “acting”, isn’t it?  Much more convenient for Tweety, though, when it’s time for the acting guy himself to be terminated, as all Tweety enablers eventually are.

Modly said Crozier should have known the letter would be made public and if he didn’t realize that, he was either “too naïve or too stupid to be a commanding officer.” Modly made these remarks over the ship’s P.A. system and of course they were immediately made public, so he, too, has now had to resign. Too naïve or stupid for the job, it seems.

Captain Crozier is now himself infected and in quarantine, and sailors on the U.S.S. Roosevelt have begun to die.  All so predictable. And Tragic. But these events happened over a week ago, and in the sped-up world of the hit reality show, “The POTUS”, we can barely remember them now. No point in going over ancient history anyway – the only question we need to address is “where to from here?” Some might say we need to talk about how we got here before we can figure a way out, but that just seems like the kind of “expertise” that always gets in the way.

I stopped listening to Trump’s daily Covid-19 “updates” a while ago for the obvious reason that they are not designed to impart useful information, but rather to put Tweety’s greatness and omniscience on display for all.  He’s a very stable genius and we must never forget that.

But every now and then some outrageous example of Trump topping himself at one of his crypto-rallies seeps into my consciousness. Yesterday he had an apparent meltdown, choosing to show some bizarrely-edited campaign propaganda video about how every decision he has made has been perfect, and then screaming at every single person who asked a question about the video they had just seen.

Apparently no one asked, “if you’ve done everything perfectly, why do we have more than three times as many cases as any other country, and 25,000 people already dead with no plan announced to end the contagion?”

The one question that was foremost on this day was whether the President actually had the authority to “open the country”, or was this ultimately going to be up to the governors of each state. Predictably, I suppose, Tweety said that, as president, his “authority is total”.

Of course, no constitutional scholar agrees with this pronouncement. For the record, though, Tweety does have total authority to control the day’s news cycle, limiting it for today to a heated discussion of whether or not he has total authority over everything else. And, of course, “many people” believe he does, which is usually all that matters these days. I’ll leave it to you, GOML reader, to guess which “news” network those believers are appearing on.

What was interesting about this tantrum was that it was just a short time ago that Tweety declined to issue a national stay-at-home order, saying it was the responsibility of the state governors to do so. He said it was because he believed in the constitution, perhaps more than anyone, and the constitution says the governors are responsible for a shut-down order, not the president.

flag

He said it was also the governors’ responsibility to procure ventilators, N-95 masks, and other personal protective gear for their own states, thereby setting up a bidding war between the states for these things, with the federal government also goosing prices higher by bidding themselves.

So it’s a puzzle, right? Tweety first says only the governors can decide to make people stay at home, but then says only the president can decide to make them go back out.  Leaving aside the obvious, i.e. that Tweety says everything and its opposite all the time, and therefore no one can take anything he says seriously, how can these two apparently contradictory statements co-exist?

Well, it’s actually pretty simple. Just as those who really want to get things done can point out that they have the responsibility but no authority to do them, Tweety’s game is rigged so that he has all the authority and none of the responsibility.

A person who is doing their job to achieve the best outcome for all doesn’t really care if he is blamed when things go wrong or not praised when things go right. Tweety, on the other hand, cares nothing about others and is obsessed only with his own “ratings”. He needs to make sure that he gets credit for anything that goes right, whether he had any part in it or not, while blaming others for everything that goes wrong, even when he is wholly responsible for the fiasco.

authority

 

 

“It’s the incompetence, stupid!”

What one word or phrase best describes the Trump presidency? So many to choose from.

Chaotic. Paranoiac. Belligerent. Reckless. Mendacious. Arrogant. Greedy. Bullying. Combative. Tactless. Mean-spirited. Bigoted.  Willfully ignorant. Demagogic. Dishonest. Un-American.

Is there a single word for “demanding total loyalty, obedience, deference, and subservience”.  There must be.  Does “tyrannic” say it all? That’s the word you find when you look up “rule by fear”, but I’m not sure that’s exactly what’s called for here, at least not all by itself.  There’s so much more that needs to be said.

Anyway, if we’re making up bumper stickers, I guess we don’t have to limit ourselves to one word. But there probably should be one slogan that we can all agree to and rally under – one rebuttal to the “Make America Great Again” deception.

I’d vote for “It’s the incompetence, stupid”.  A close second would be “It’s the stupid incompetence”. To me, that’s the greatest problem Trump poses, particularly during a real crisis, an existential crisis where his “I’ll wing it” method of governing simply doesn’t work.  When real leadership is required, confidence is nice but competence is required. If you don’t have it yourself, you must recognize it in others and rely on it where you find it.

Trump doesn’t have it and has no idea what it looks like.

metric

It’s all up here. The only metric I need.

That was Trump’s answer when asked what metric he would use to make the most important decision of his presidency, i.e. whether to “re-open” the country during the Covid-19 pandemic. It’s really not surprising, since that’s how Trump decides everything. No facts or science gets in the way, no professional counsel or expert opinion. Just whatever flies out of his head onto his Twitter. He has such fantastic instincts.

If Fox and Friends likes the sound of it, we’re done. Sometimes it works the other way around, too: someone at Fox blathers something, and the next thing you know it’s flying out of Trump’s Twitter.  If it turns out that the initial blathering posed problems, he simply denies he ever re-blathered it. Fake news. Lamestream media playing “gotcha”.  No, what he really meant was the exact opposite. See?

And that, kiddies, is how a bill becomes a law in the Land of Trump.

There’s so much about the Covid-19 pandemic that the Man-baby just can’t grasp. First and foremost, he can’t just simply pronounce it over and proclaim yet another fantastic accomplishment. Better than anything any president has ever done before, except maybe Lincoln. He was pretty good, too.

Everyone who understands science and medicine will tell you that no real progress can be made until we have widespread , virtually universal testing in place. We have to know who is presently infected, and who has already had it. That’s because it’s highly contagious and we have no way to prevent its spread. And no way to treat it. We don’t even know for sure at this point whether you can get it a second time. Or even whether you can give it to or get it from your pets.

Trump is on record as saying that we won’t have testing for everyone. He said, “Do you need it? No. Is it a nice thing to do? Yes.”  Of course, it doesn’t really mean anything anymore for him to be “on record”, but it does give you a clue to the absurd reasoning he’ll be using to make the biggest decision he’s ever had to make.

If you encourage people to go back to church, to work, to concerts and ballgames, they will simply continue to spread the disease until every last one of us gets it.

sick

Tweety and his minions want to point to the “peaking” of new cases as a sign that the worst is behind us. They have forgotten that the whole point of “flattening the curve” was to spread out the inevitable infections over time so that our health care system might not be overwhelmed all at once, and perhaps give researchers time to come up with a vaccine or treatments, and time for manufacturers to make enough protective gear. “Flattening the curve” and “turning the corner” are not the same.

If it looks like we’ve actually managed to flatten the curve at this point, it is because of the success of the social distancing and other measures we’ve all agreed to over the last weeks. If the country is “re-opened”, those gains evaporate. We have to wait until we have a means of prevention or at least treatment.

If Trump says, “OK, that’s it – country’s open again!”, are you going to do anything differently? Are you going to put down your face mask? Go out to restaurants? Ride public transportation? I’m not and maybe you aren’t either, but there are millions of people who are still listening to the man-baby and still think he knows what he’s talking about. If he tells them it’s over, well, that’s all they need to know.

They think he’s competent.

But despite it all, there’s still some great news to report. The good old U. S. of A.  is back on top! In just 45 days we have gone from having no deaths, fewer than 15 cases, and going down to zero fast, to having the most Covid-19 deaths in the world and three times more confirmed cases than any other country.

We’re Number One!

giphy

Reality vs. Reality Show

I remember when Trump first announced he would star in The Apprentice, a ridiculous and ridiculously popular vanity project that promoted the questionable narrative that he was a brilliantly successful businessman. I thought, “Huh? An obscenely rich and successful real estate developer and entrepreneur wants to ‘star’ a silly piece of fluff? Why? Would Warren Buffet do this? Bill Gates? Carlos Slim?”

It took me a while to understand that Trump had not, in fact, been a brilliantly successful entrepreneur, and that the “why” was that his greatest aspiration had always been to be on TV, where the largest number of people could see him, talk about him, and admire him.

What Trump actually did have an exceptional talent for was deceiving people, sometimes referred to as “marketing”.

At the time, Trump was already pretty famous as a promoter, scam artist, and business fraud, but the TV show really propelled him into the national spotlight.

promoter

Promoter, as “heel”

uni2

Scam Artist – gotta love that Coat-of-Arms. Classy!

A Few Trump Businesses – where are they now?

The TV show, however, was a whole new level of celebrity, and the “Executive Presence” he appeared to demonstrate on camera apparently qualified him for elective office in the opinion of millions of voters.

What Trump has always understood better than anyone else is that, doubters notwithstanding, lipstick really does kind of make a pig more attractive. Enough, anyway, to make it weirdly desirable in the very short run.

pig

Everybody knows that, yes, it’s still a pig, but there’s something, um, I don’t know, different about it. Different and better. The thin veneer of “luxury” and “quality” he applies to his rickety projects has always been more than enough to put them over on unsuspecting investors, customers, and publicity agents.

The one thing that Trump has learned better than anything in his career is that to make people believe in what you’re selling, you have to believe it yourself. And you have to make them want it. Bad. It doesn’t make any difference at all if the thing you’re selling actually is what you say it is or does what you say it does. If the buyer wants it bad enough, he will attest that it works. And you can always sue him for libel or whatever if he complains about it. Or fire him, if he works for you. He’s done it literally thousands of times.

The approach that brought him so much “success” in business is the approach favored by Tweety in the day-to-day execution of his duties as POTUS. Or maybe we should say “in the current episode of the hit reality show ‘The POTUS'”.

Go with what you know. If people are worried about getting sick, you simply sell them a cure. It is, of course, first necessary to silence any credible voices, also known as medical professionals, who may want to point out that what you’re selling is not, in fact, a cure, and that unfortunately there is no cure.

As everyone knows, President Tweety gets all the information he needs, including information on science and medicine, from FoxNews. Sean Hannity, his friend, adviser, and daily phone buddy, has determined that an anti-malarial drug called Hydroxychoroquine will cure Covid-19. He has implored New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to stop denying the wonder-drug to sick people there.

That’s good enough for Tweety. Inside the White House “Situation Room”, where the Coronavirus Task Force meets, a battle over Hydroycholoquine has broken out. As Axios reports, Trump believes it’s a game changer and so his closest allies on the task force, specifically Peter Navarro, are championing the miracle drug.

“Who is Peter Navarro?”, I hear you asking, “and why is he on the task force?” Both good questions. He’s an economist, Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator. And why is he on the task force? To protect the economy, of course.

extinction

Another medical expert at the table, Jared Kushner (you remember Jared, right? The guy who brought us peace in the Middle East), agrees with Navarro about the value of the malaria med, but had to tell him to take it down a notch as he was screaming at Anthony Fauci, accusing him of being against Trump’s policies. Navarro had a bunch of papers which he said were “evidence” that Hydroxychloroquine cures Covid-19, but Fauci was pointing out they were not evidence, but rather anecdotes from France and China with no Control Group testing (there’s that damn scientific method again, always screwing things up for the good guys!)

Fauci didn’t bother to mention that there is also anecdotal evidence that taking the drug could kill you. That’s what GOML is here for. Anyway, the day’s meeting ended with the agreement that the administration’s public posture would be that the decision to use the drug is between doctors and patients.

Of course Tweety doesn’t care what a bunch of egg-heads, even his own egg-heads, agree that he should say. He’s going with what he knows – marketing!

“What do you have to lose? Take it,” the president said in a White House briefing on Saturday, pushing Fauci out of the way when the question was asked. “I really think they should take it. But it’s their choice. And it’s their doctor’s choice or the doctors in the hospital. But hydroxychloroquine. Try it, if you’d like.”

Yup, it’s your choice. Reality or Reality Show. Problem is, the people who prefer the Reality Show are making the rest of us sick.

How to respond to a pandemic

Learn from Taiwan.

The U.S. and Taiwan got their first confirmed cases of Covid-19 on the same day, January 19, 2020. Taiwan was ready for it and acted aggressively to stop its spread and save lives. The U.S. ignored it.

break

As I write this, less than three months later, the U.S, has 312,245 cases, three times as many as the next most severely-hit countries, Spain and Italy, and nearly 1000 times as many cases as Taiwan, which now has 355 cases. Depending on when you read this, these numbers will have become worse, much worse, or catastrophically worse. Have a look.

In the internet age, it’s easy to learn how Taiwan succeeded, and what we could have done differently here, given halfway intelligent leadership. In this short video, for example, you will learn that Taiwanese officials boarded planes arriving from China to test passengers before they deplaned. They coordinated health agencies and used “big data” to merge health records with travel records to determine whether Covid-19 tests should be administered to the de-planing passengers (they had sufficient tests ready to deploy on the spot). They issued masks and escorted people who tested positive to their destination alone in special vehicles. They quarantined the affected people and used cell-phone data to track them and called them three times a day to monitor their symptoms. They brought them food or took them to the doctor. During quarantine, the police first started detaining violators and then began paying them to remain home.  And so on, etc., ad infinitum.

The Taiwanese government took control of making and distributing masks, and are now in a position to donate their surpluses of over a million masks to other afflicted countries who hadn’t displayed their intelligence, foresight, and determination to stop the virus. Like that poor “superpower”, the U.S.A.  It feels like the story of The Ant and the Grasshopper, but with a potentially more charitable ending.

the ant

In the U.S., however, we are led by a very stable genius who doesn’t take advice from scientists, health professionals, or history, since his instincts and gut-feelings are always correct. So we embarked on a different course. While bragging about how we have the best health system in the world, the best scientific minds, the best corporations, etc., there has been virtually no action from the Executive branch to marshal these resources against the outbreak.

It wouldn’t have been that hard to do, even without Taiwan’s example.

patriots plane

Bob Kraft’s jet brings 1.7 million masks from China

Nets

Joe Tsai, Nets owner, donates masks and ventilators

We all know the continuing evolution of  Tweety’s pronouncements on the pandemic. They’re too ridiculous to catalog here, but it boils down to him asking himself first whether the person who is explaining things to him is a devoted Trump ally or not. He often concludes that a scientist, for example, may not not have voted for him, and so science must therefore be a liberal hoax, like the Russian collusion investigation or the Impeachment process, whose objective is to bring him down.  His son and principal surrogate, Don Jr., clarifies the Trump camp posture by saying that Democrats want millions of people to die in the pandemic.

Trump far prefers fighting with everybody about everything to actually doing his job.  He is a liar, a con-man, and a fraud who lied and conned his way into the most powerful position in the world. He has repeatedly been revealed to be utterly incompetent, and we are all now paying a devastating price.

I would like to wear an N-95 mask the next time I go to the market. I had a whole package of them a while back, but used the last one during a spray-painting project and failed to get a new supply. Now, it’s impossible to find one. I looked on my healthcare provider’s web site for guidance, and saw that they had issued a plea for people to make masks at home and donate them to the facility.  The medical professionals that have always been there to help us must now ask us to help them.

I found this mask in my tool-box, but the filter cartridges are not available for purchase anymore – they’re designated on Amazon as “Prioritized for hospitals and government agencies directly responding to COVID-19 in the U.S.”

stewie

Guess I’ll just have to take my chances when going for food. Like everyone else who’s been paying attention, I feel a bit trapped and without options, just waiting for the Angel of Corona to pass over. I never in a million years thought I’d say something like this, but, today at least, I think I’d rather be waiting in Taiwan.

 

 

Doubling Down

How many times have you read that Trump has “doubled down” on something? A hundred times? It’s almost always a situation where someone tried to call him on his bullshit, pointing out that what he said or did or predicted last month is now demonstrably false or inappropriate. I just googled “Trump doubles down” and got 208 million hits.

Trump is compelled by his disease to double down on everything. If he didn’t, someone might conclude that he was actually wrong about something, and that must never happen.

dorian

The very real damage he has done with this personality defect includes costing people their livelihoods and even their lives. Remember the Central Park Five, those kids wrongly convicted of the Central Park Jogger attack? It was Trump that led the charge, relentlessly insisting on their guilt and prosecution without any evidence or due process, doubling down on this position even after the five were shown to be innocent and were released after years of incarceration, and continuing to double down even to this day.

And then there was the “Birther” movement. You may or may not remember that this absurd harassment of Barack Obama was led by Trump and kept alive by him years after everyone who was open to actual evidence about it realized it was nutty. Trump and his newspaper-of-record, the National Enquirer, wouldn’t let it go. Trump banged away at his talking points: “What’s he hiding? Why won’t he produce his long-form birth certificate? Every president should be required to do it! I have investigators in Hawaii and you wouldn’t believe what they’re finding! We’ll be releasing information soon”.

Right. We wouldn’t believe what they’re finding. You won’t release information because there is none. And oh, by the way, there were never any investigators, either. And the reason Obama didn’t want to produce his long-form birth certificate was that he was busy being president and couldn’t be constantly responding to every lunatic making crazy demands on him.

Obama bore the whole years-long assault with his remarkable equanimity and good humor, and, because it seemed like the only way to put an end to it, finally did produce the magic birth certificate, which of course convinced no one of anything.

And, of course, Tweety predictably declared victory, not because it proved Obama wasn’t born here, but because he had succeeded in forcing this unnecessary action by Obama when no one else could (because no one else gave an actual shit). And just to put a Trumpian bow on the whole thing, the man-baby refused to release his own birth certificate.

So I think we have to forgive Obama for doing the thing that lit the fuse that ultimately led to the Tweety administration – he had the audacity, after all the aggravation Trump caused, to poke some gentle fun at him at the 2011 White House Correspondents’ dinner. Watch this clip to understand the pathogenesis of Trump’s “movement”.

On that night, Trump’s humiliation was such that he vowed to take revenge against Obama and all the “elitists” who refused to take him seriously. And, as revenge-taking is one of the few things Trump actually excels at, he did it.

Trump’s first and only real policy imperative on being elected was to undo anything and everything the Obama administration had accomplished, no matter how great or how trivial. From the Paris climate accords to the Iran nuclear treaty, and from school lunch standards to re-naming a mountain,  the man-baby got busy reversing it all. If he couldn’t prove Obama had been an illegitimate president, he would erase the record that he had ever been president at all, illegitimate or otherwise.

The most important element of this project was the elimination of “Obamacare”. Trump’s Obama-erasing could not be complete as long as the historic, landmark health care initiative was still in place, especially since it had ‘Obama’ right in its name! Trump could not rest while the thorn of Obamacare was still in his paw.

As we all know, the republican obsession to gut or extinguish Obamacare has resulted in a years-long string of bills meant to diminish it and law-suits aimed at declaring its central tenets illegal or unconstitutional. But Obamacare survives, primarily because so many people believe that it was a good thing to enable tens of millions of people who hadn’t had health insurance to finally get it.

Which brings us to the Coronavirus pandemic. A lot of people with an ounce of empathy, i.e. democrats, as well as a lot of people who could never be accused of having any real empathy at all, i.e. some health insurers, have implored Trump to open an enrollment window for Obamacare during the Covid-19 crisis so that some of the afflicted can be helped, if only a little. People who have lost their jobs and thus their insurance because of the pandemic could benefit. Insurers had expected the Trump administration to open the window last Friday.

Although the annual enrollment period ended a couple of months ago, the Trump administration initially responded by saying they would “explore the options” of re-launching the HealthCare.gov website.

The decision has now been made. Nope. No Obamacare registrations during the pandemic. That might make it seem like Barack Obama helped someone, and worse, might imply that Trump had been wrong about something. Time to double down.

ratings

The Adults in the Room

Yesterday, just hours after I wrote about Trump converting the Corona Virus briefings into campaign events, he abandoned all pretense of providing relevant information about the Covid-19 response. Millions of Americans tuned in to the afternoon briefing  to hear what’s happening, get some guidance, and maybe even find out when they can get an N-95 mask. Instead they got a press conference on new developments in The War On Drugs, an update on how fabulously effective Tweety’s “Wall” on our southern border is, and some self-congratulatory nonsense on the long-forgotten, imaginary “caravans” that have been assaulting our borders.

This went on for hours, while nervous citizens at home waited patiently for information about the pandemic.  Secretary of Defense Mike Esper was front and center with all the great news about Trump’s successes, and, of course, thanking him profusely for his “leadership” as is now required as the opening lines to any speaking part in the Tweety Show.

I hadn’t really paid much attention to Esper until this week, when he appeared on some news interviews explaining that he would not comply with Capt. Brett Crozier’s desperate request to evacuate the 4000 sailors on the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier now in Guam. In the necessarily close quarters of the ship, where “social distancing” is not possible, dozens of men are already sick with Corona Virus and hundreds have tested positive. No mention of how many of the 4000 were tested in all.

Crozier wrote a four-page letter to the Navy Department that said, in part, “We are not at war. Sailors do not need to die. If we do not act now, we are failing to properly take care of our most trusted asset — our Sailors.”  Esper said he had “not had a chance to read that letter … in detail” and claimed the sailors were not seriously ill.

At the time I saw this, I thought, “Wow. Is this guy a moron or what?” Then I realized that he may be a perfectly sane and qualified person, who hoped to serve the country well in the vitally important role of Secretary of Defense. But when you work for Tweety, you need to give up all thoughts of patriotic service.  As everyone knows by now, everything Tweety touches dies. Your moral compass is the first casualty, and it’s a long, steady slide downhill after that. Guys like Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort, or Roger Stone didn’t really have that far to fall, since they had no moral compass to begin with, but even those who start out straight wind up in the same place anyway.

So I guess I wasn’t all that surprised to see Esper participate so enthusiastically  in the alt-Covid briefing.  There are fifteen “cabinet members” in the Tweety administration, but there might as well be none. Not a single one of them can say or do a single thing that Trump hasn’t personally authorized, and they must do everything that he commands.

Here’s a triva question for you: what do James Mattis, Rex Tillerson, and John Kelly have in common? The answer is the title of this essay: they were all once considered the adults in the room. They were well-qualified, experienced professionals who would not be yes-men to a man-baby and would intervene to thwart Trump’s most destructive impulses. We all tried to take a measure of comfort in the idea that they might be able to control events in some small way after a crazy-tweet, a lashing-out, or the implementation of an insane policy based on made up “facts”.

What happened to them has happened to every individual who has tried to do what they thought was right when it differed in any small way from what Trump wanted them to do.

So, for anyone still waiting for some useful information from Trump on Covid-19, just forget it. Even that hero of science and truth, Anthony Fauci, who has appeared to defy Trump’s nutty pronouncements on occasion, has had to pull in his horns time and again, and will do so even more as the death threats from Trump’s loyal brown-shirts increase.

But GOML does have a few nuggets for you.   Here ya go. If you want an N-95 mask, you’ll have to make one yourself. There will probably be no ventilators for you if you are hospitalized, and even if you got on one, you are very unlikely to get off it alive. There will be no vaccine for, optimistically,  another 18 months. There are no known meds that treat the virus effectively. Health care professionals, who are valiantly trying to help the afflicted, are most at risk, and their numbers will be greatly diminished by the time you will need them.

Hunker down and buckle up. It’s going to be a rough ride.

The Bully’s Pulpit

On February 26, 2020, Donald J. Trump informed us that Vice President Mike Pence would be in charge of the administration’s Covid-19 response. Trump was in India at the time and insisting that the situation in the U.S. was under control. A typical Tweet from those days, only a month ago:

“Low Ratings Fake News MSDNC (Comcast) & @CNN are doing everything possible to make the Caronavirus [sic] look as bad as possible, including panicking markets, if possible. Likewise their incompetent Do Nothing Democrat comrades are all talk, no action. USA in great shape.”

The appointment of Pence to this role was a response to that bunch of deep-state never-Trumpers known as the Center for Disease Control saying that the spread of the virus in the U.S. was all but inevitable, and various “advisers” whispering in Trump’s ear that some sort of action was called for.

Putting Pence in charge was a no-brainer.  If the virus was indeed nothing, Pence would be in charge of nothing. If it was as bad as those “scientists” were saying, Pence would be at fault and Trump would have a great excuse for dropping him from the 2020 ticket in favor of someone more aligned with his long term goals of self-enrichment and re-shaping the position of President into something more akin to Pharaoh.  Don Jr. would be perfect!

Anyway, something unexpected happened to cause Tweety to rethink this plan: people were actually listening to Pence and giving him a lot of kudos for the job he was doing. And he was on TV everyday for an hour or more. Clearly this could not stand.

So after a week or so, the daily Covid “briefings” were taken over by Tweety himself, with Pence standing dutifully and silently behind him, as better befits his true role in the Trump administration.

And the briefings themselves were transformed from a daily update on where we were with Covid-19 to a daily campaign rally where the usual Trump exaggerations, misinformation, and preposterous lying were combined with vicious attacks on the reporters asking for information and constant carping about what a mess Obama left him.

The beauty of being Trump is that his daily eructation of nonsense is so voluminous that there is simply no time to try to tease out actual information before the next day’s output. And, of course, no chance to hold him accountable for outright lies, even when they put the health and even survival of others at risk.

This enables him to say absolutely anything at all with the same air of conviction and self-righteousness as when he said the exact opposite, perhaps just the day before. A nice example of this is Tweety suddenly asserting on March 17th that “I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic.”

The mind-numbing effect on his audiences of this daily whipsaw has always worked for Trump. If he had ever been elected to a position like Mayor or  Governor or even hall-monitor, where he was held accountable for his own actions, maybe things would be different now.  I remember those days of innocence after the 2016 election when we all thought that this crazy behavior would have to end, as the Presidency was not a joke, and anyway we had two other co-equal branches of government, congress and the courts, who would rein him in. And, of course, there would be plenty of clear heads in Trump’s own party who would call him on his bullshit.

If only.

Over the last three years, virtually every avenue of resistance has been eliminated. Not only has the attrition of honest Republicans like John McCain, Jeff Flake or Bob Corker made way for more sycophants, but those who supported Trump every inch of the way, like Jeff Sessions or Paul Ryan have been purged for trying to do their jobs as they understood them. Just one ambiguous action or remark can be a career-ender.  Even Trump’s most vociferous critics before the election, like Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and even Mitt Romney have gone silent.

The other day Lindsay Graham, once McCain’s best friend and a vocal Trump critic, accused Nancy Pelosi of “the most shameful, disgusting statement by any politician in modern history.”  She had said Trump’s delayed response to the Corona virus would cost lives.

Of course it’s true. The problem created by Trump’s wild pronouncements is that his foot-soldiers out there in the heartland, i.e. republican governors, have to repeat and act on them. If he says Covid-19 is no worse than the flu, or that it’s a hoax, or that it’s completely under control and no one should change their behavior, well, OK, that is now reality, and policies will be announced reflecting it. But unlike Trump, those “leaders” on the ground can’t walk it all back the next day. Even if they could, the damage is already done: people congregated where they shouldn’t have, businesses stayed open when they shouldn’t have, respirators and ventilators remained un-manufactured for another day.  And, of course,  the average voter in those states doesn’t know what to think or what’s real.  Pelosi simply stated the obvious, but Graham was required to fight about it.

Trump’s de-fanging of the fourth estate is now complete. Not only is any news he doesn’t like immediately dismissed as “fake”, but he has now moved strongly against those who only wish to hold him accountable for his own words. He has issued an order that his critics Cease and Desist from quoting him in campaign ads.  According to this Slate piece, the order “threatened to sue critics of the president in a brazen effort to censor Trump’s opponents into silence”

There are no credible voices left to dissent to Trump’s war on science, expertise, and truth, and his re-election is all but assured. During this time when Trump is spewing on all media for hours every day, Biden is nowhere, completely irrelevant. I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that Trump’s approval ratings have spiked upward during the last few weeks.

With Trump’s grip on information tightening every day, it is no longer newsworthy when he says something that is manifestly untrue, which he does dozens of times every day. On the contrary, it is now a news story if someone in the Republican Party disagrees with him, as Maryland Governor Larry Hogan did this week.  Citing Trump’s assertion that Corona Virus testing problems have all been solved, he said “that’s just not true.”

Hogan made the statement during an NPR interview, so there is virtually no risk of anyone in Trump’s thrall hearing it, so he may escape the inevitable wrath from the bully’s pulpit.  But I doubt it.

The N-word of the Narcissus

So, an African-American high-school security guard was fired from his job for using the “N-word”.  The school has a “zero tolerance policy”, and the principal said, “Regardless of context or circumstance, racial slurs are not acceptable in our schools.”  Therein lies the problem, of course. Context matters.

The context in this case was that the guard, Marlon Anderson, had been called to help remove a disruptive student (who is also African-American) from the property because he was threatening the life of the assistant principal. During the episode, the student called Anderson the “n-word” over and over, and Anderson finally replied, “Do not call me that name. I’m not your [N-word]. Do not call me that.”

Oops. He said it. Everyone heard him use the word. Fired. Zero tolerance.

Happily, I guess, Anderson got his job back five days later after a thousand people protested the absurd situation, including all the students at the school who staged a walk-out over it. Policy and enforcement seem to be determined by who vilifies the principal soonest and loudest. That’s just how things work in the internet age.

I don’t know why, but this article in the Harvard Crimson about a DACA protest made me think of the fired guard. I guess because they’re both examples of how “the left” makes an easy target of itself for Trump and Trumpism.

At Harvard, there was a demonstration and walk-out ahead of the Supreme Court decision on DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), the program that allows people who were brought here illegally as kids to stay and work. Trump is against it, of course, as it is an Obama-era policy. Nuf ced.

But the protest turned from the DACA issue to an attack on the several Asian American student organizations that didn’t join the 21 campus organizations co-sponsoring the walk-out.  An open letter addressed to “The Asian American Community” condemning this inaction has been signed by 400 people at Harvard and elsewhere.  In other words, the whole thing swiftly morphed into the typical kind of thought-policing and anti-free-speech posturing that the student left is often accused of, and, in doing so, overshadowed and diminished the effectiveness of the DACA protest itself.

It’s crazy. It’s more important for these kids to attack and denigrate any of their peers who might not agree with them 100% on everything than it is for them to make their points on DACA.

And the letter itself contained several phrases that just jumped out at me as perfect fuel for the Trump attack machine. The first two are new (to me) elements of the lexicon of the left.

The protest was organized, in part, by the “Harvard Asian American Womxn’s Association”.  Hmmm.  I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that we need the term “womxn” because the term “womyn” (which we needed to get out from under the “men” thing) was not trans-inclusive?  Anyway, I hadn’t received the memo about this change. Now I know.

And then there is this phrase of castigation:  “You have outed yourselves as non-safe spaces for undocu+ people within the Asian American community”.  Huh?  “Undocu+”?  I have no idea why we need this term. Could it be that we just really want to avoid actually printing out the next three letters, “men”, that would be contained in the word “undocumented”?  If so, wow.

My problem with these terms is that if you’re going to change the “correct” vocabulary every week, you really need to be careful about calling anyone racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. the following week if they mistakenly use the now-incorrect language. You have to give us a fighting chance to get “woke”.

Last, and most preposterously, there is this:  “It is literally impossible to live as a person of color on the stolen land that is the United States without either being political or being politically instrumentalized by oppressive structures.”

Holy shit. Literally impossible. I’m not sure what the proposed solution to the “stolen land” conundrum might be, though clearly Harvard will need to be relocated at some point.  And I’m wondering if the problem of land-stealing oppressors also applies to Canada? Australia?  I already know their answer for Israel.  And what if you could argue that the land-stealers themselves were People of Color, as you might in the case of Brazil or even Pakistan? Are they oppressors as well, or are we giving them a pass under the only-white-people-can-be-oppressors rule?  Complicated.

Anyway, you all know how I feel about Trump, and if you don’t, just glance at any of these 107 articles. For a long time, I was just baffled at how 60 million people could be so loyal to him, until I realized it wasn’t love of Trump but rather hatred of “liberals” that animated them.

Examples like the ones cited today bring the issue into sharper focus for me, and tend to drain the last few drops of hope that I still had that, in 2020, we might be able to correct the disastrous course we have set ourselves on with this man.

Four More Years!

Saddest thing in the whole wide world…

See your baby with another girl. Right? Everyone of a certain age knows the lyrics to “Sally Go Round The Roses”, the Jaynetts’ huge 1963 hit.

For years, I didn’t really give much thought to the question of what the saddest thing in the whole wide world really was. I figured the Jaynetts had settled the issue and I could think about other things. But a couple of years ago, I saw something which was way sadder than seeing your baby with another girl. I haven’t mentioned it to anyone until now. Too sad.

Anyone who knows me will tell you I’m one of those curmudgeons who likes animals a lot more than people. I like all animals, dogs in particular. I even like animals that don’t like me, though most of them can figure out I’m not a threat and are neutral at worst. I still think every day about the first and best friend I ever had, a beautiful girl .

puppy

Before I went away to summer camp one year, I went over to a neighbor’s house to say goodbye. My friend followed me and waited by the front door. I stupidly left via the back door and forgot about her. Later I found out she didn’t leave the neighbor’s door for three days, apparently thinking I was still inside.

If you ask most people about the happiest day of their life, they’ll say it was their wedding day, or the day their child was born, or the war ended, or something like that. I would too, I guess, though one moment stands out for me even now as perhaps the happiest moment of my life. When I came back from summer camp, my friend went absolutely insane with joy that I had returned. It was like one of those Youtube videos where the soldier returns from deployment and his dog sees him for the first time in months or years and just flips out. Only more so.

My friend’s total happiness made me totally happy, and I learned something then which I know with absolute certainty: animals have emotions. Just like us. You will often hear people say they couldn’t possibly, but I can tell you with 100% confidence that those people don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.

Which brings me back to the saddest thing. Did you know Canada Geese are monogamous and mate for life? I didn’t either until a couple of years ago.

geese

Mom and Dad, with chicks

On my daily bike ride around the Charles River three years ago, I saw a dead Canada Goose lying right next to the path. It looked like she had a broken neck, but I wasn’t sure. I wondered how it happened. Maybe some kid threw a rock at her, or fired a BB gun, or maybe she was hit by a bike. God knows there are so many geese around the river these days that they’re competing with walkers and bikers for the path, and they’re not shy about asserting their rights, either! They make a mess, too (but I still like them).

It was pretty sad seeing the poor goose like that, but it got sadder. The next day on my ride, I saw that she was still there, but her mate was now there too, keeping a vigil, or waiting for her to “wake up”, or just bereft without a clue as to what to do next. And they were both there the following day, too, and the day after. On the fourth day, I changed my route. I just didn’t want to keep seeing anything that sad anymore. The saddest thing in the whole wide world is one beautiful, innocent animal grieving the death of another.

One of the things that separates us from the animals is that they’re not aware of their own mortality. We know we’re going to die at some point, but they really don’t, and maybe they don’t even comprehend what death is. But that doesn’t mean they don’t experience grief. I know they do.

So how come I’m writing about this sad thing now after not mentioning it for years? This story about a really silly woman shooting a giraffe for fun made me think of it.

Giraffes aren’t monogamous and don’t mate for life. I’m not sure if the other giraffes grieve for one that has been senselessly assassinated. But we can.

giraffe

Mrs. Stewie Generis makes a new friend

A Day at the Beach

A really unlikely thing happened to two young brothers seventy-five years ago. They hadn’t seen each other for a couple of years and had lost touch. Neither knew what had happened to the other, or even if the other was still alive.

Harold left his home in western Massachusetts at his first real chance. When he turned 18, he enlisted in the army. The Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor a couple of months earlier, and like most Americans at that point in time, Harold wanted to do his part.

Also, he would be escaping a rough family situation. His mother had died of cancer and his father met another woman who didn’t want anything to do with the five kids still at home. The kids were split up – the oldest girl becoming an au-pair elsewhere, the youngest sent to an orphanage, and the others kicked around as best they could.  It was the Great Depression and there was no money, no job, no chance for education, and nothing to look forward to but struggle, deprivation, and strife.

For Harold, the army represented independence and adventure, and Charlie, only 16 at the time, wanted to follow his brother’s example. He hitched a ride to New Jersey and, using Harold’s identity to “prove” his age, joined the army as well.

For two years Harold did whatever the army told him to do, and on June 6, 1944, they told him to bob around in the English Channel for 17 hours and then jump into the chest-deep water off Normandy with his M1 and hit the beach firing. So he did.

dday

It was chaos. Things didn’t go as planned for a million reasons. The weather was bad and waves mid-channel were five to six feet high.  Twenty-seven of the thirty-two tanks that were supposed to go ashore to support the infantry at Omaha Beach never made it out of the water. The Germans, high up on the bluffs above the beach, were mowing the Americans down as they waded ashore. There were 12,000 allied dead on the five landing beaches that first day.

Harold was one of the lucky ones. To his surprise, he was not hit.  But an even bigger surprise was waiting on the sand – Charlie was already there! The brothers were reunited after two years amidst the withering Nazi fire raining down on them.

Miraculously, they both survived the war and lived to tell about the unlikely meeting. Except they never did. It wasn’t until a couple of weeks before his death many decades later that Charlie ever mentioned it to his niece, Mrs. Stewie Generis, the daughter of the au-pair in the story.

Until that point, no one in the family knew anything about the brothers’ experience on D-Day  or what happened on Omaha Beach. As far as they were all concerned, the two had been in the army in WWII like everyone else, and that was about it.

To a couple of guys who had seen what they had seen and done what they had done, the amazing coincidence just didn’t seem important enough to mention.

dday2

 

Trump is the best since Lincoln!

It’s official. After years of breathless anticipation, John Voight has finally revealed his official assessment of President Donald John Trump. And, guess what? Turns out Trump is the best president since Abraham Lincoln!

Voight, who starred in a good movie 5o years ago, has expressed his admiration for the tiny-handed, revoltingly-fat, extremely stable genius a few times in the past. For example, in a March 2016 Breitbart interview, he said

“Donald is funny, playful, and colorful, but most of all, he is honest.  He has no bull to sell, and everyone will discover the bull most politicians spew out is for their own causes and benefits,”

 

Right on.  I, too, believe it’s Trump’s level of honesty that is his most important and distinguishing characteristic.

Voight now says,  “Trump has made his every move correct”, and “This job is not easy, for he’s battling the left and their absurd words of destruction. Our nation has been built on the solid ground from our forefathers, and there is a moral code of duty that has been passed on from President Lincoln.”

Trump, never one to let flattery influence his thinking on who the most qualified and deserving candidates for various positions might be,  announced the appointment of Voight as a trustee of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, serving through 2024.

Of all the various attributes that Trump has in common with Lincoln, I think it’s actually his debating style that most clearly mirrors what Honest Abe was really all about.

debate

The loser now will be later to lose

This week, Justin Amash, a Republican representative from a pro-Trump district in Michigan, broke ranks with his caucus by stating the obvious. He tweeted (of course):

amash

The response was immediate and predictable, with members of the House Freedom Caucus condemning him,  followed by the almost instantaneous primary challenge to Amash.  It is this kind of challenge that explains why no Republican will (successfully) defy Trump. The experience of Mark Sanford has been seared into their political flesh like the Mark of the Beast.

It’s exactly why Lindsay Graham, not so long ago one of Trump’s harshest critics and staunchest allies of Trump’s bête noire, John McCain, is now among the most unctuous sycophants in Trumpworld.

Over at CNN, there was some absurd and misplaced hope that Amash represented a crack in the dam or some such nonsense, and everything would be different now. If only. Slate was more realistic.

Here at GOML, the only real question was, “What insult-nickname would Trump come up with for Amash?” So many are already taken, but Tweety has a seemingly inexhaustible supply. Mayor Pete, for example, became “Alfred E. Neuman”, which no one saw coming. Biden is now “Sleepy-Creepy”, which coming from the Pussy-Grabber-In-Chief is just surreal.

If Trump doesn’t come up with something especially unique and cruel for you, he probably just isn’t that worried about you, and Amash seemed to fall into that category. He’s only got the catch-all “Lightweight Loser” so far, which is what Trump calls everybody that disagrees with him on anything.

I don’t really know how someone who has succeeded in getting elected to Congress can be a “loser”, but the word seems to have its own definition and parameters for Tweety.

So what do you think -will Amash have a job in Washington in 2020?

The Times, Are They a-Changin’?

Lizzie Warren Took An Axe

And gave her campaign forty whacks.

Doesn’t matter, though. As Friend-Of-The-Blog Carol noted the other day, the “cartooning” of Warren has already had its intended effect. However strong her appeal to the progressives in the Democratic Party might be, she was not going to prevail in the general election if nominated.

But she did something really great in my opinion. Courageous and necessary, truthful and ultimately futile. She took a principled stand against FoxNews, something every serious citizen should applaud. She declined to participate in a FoxNews sponsored “Town Hall” event, saying,

“Fox News has invited me to do a town hall, but I’m turning them down — here’s why. … Fox News is a hate-for-profit racket that gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists — it’s designed to turn us against each other, risking life & death consequences, to provide cover for the corruption that’s rotting our government and hollowing out our middle class,

Wow. Finally. Couldn’t have said it better myself. Problem is, not a single FoxNews viewer is going to listen to that and ask themselves whether perhaps they should look elsewhere for their information. What they will say, and have echoed and reinforced a billion times over by Hannity, et al., is that those pointy-headed, think-they’re-so-smart, Libtards and Cucks are at it again. They’re calling you “deplorable”, and Elizabeth Warren is the worst possible Hillary Clinton. Lock her up.

What no one in the Democratic Party seems to grasp, even after three years of Trump’s ascendancy,  is that the typical Trump voter doesn’t love Trump nearly as much as he hates “liberals”. Trump is their man exactly because he openly mocks them and bullies them and ignores their feeble attempts to fight back.

The problem in our hyper-connected age of instantaneous communication is not that FoxNews is a cynical, dangerous, anti-patriotic threat to our country and therefore the world. That’s all true, of course, but it’s not entirely their fault. The problem is that there is a huge market to be served and profit to be made from the tens of millions of viewers who need their own narrow view of the world validated. If it wasn’t FoxNews, someone else would do it. FoxNews does it better than anyone and is improving their game all the time.

Am I saying FoxNews viewers are “Deplorables”?  Not exactly. I’m saying they have blinders on for some reason I don’t get. I used to see an E.N.T. specialist who was a brilliant guy, taught at Harvard Med, and performed innovative surgeries at Mass. Eye and Ear. But he always had FoxNews on in his waiting room and I just couldn’t abide it.

When I’d ask him about it, he always complained that his taxes were so high and he could never vote for a tax-and-spend liberal, and that you could only get the right perspective on FoxNews. I’d try to wedge in some ideas about how that perspective was surrounded by bias, exaggeration and outright lies, while stopping short of just referring to it as Bullshit Mountain, but I never made a dent. Was my E.N.T. a “deplorable”? No. He was a good guy. I liked him a lot. I just couldn’t go there any more, so, after a few years, I had to find someone else.

So what’s the answer? If you play along with Fox, you legitimize them and compromise yourself. If you take a principled stand against them, you’re ridiculed and vilified and probably ending your political career.

There has to be a way to reach the people who think they hate you, but I just have no idea what it might be. Clearly, Elizabeth Warren doesn’t either.

 

Biden v. Hill: the never-ending apology

Last week, Joe Biden was in Massachusetts supporting the strikers against Stop and Shop management. He gave a speech citing how much money company ownership was taking out of the business while trying to cut wages and benefits for their employees. He said, “This is wrong. This is morally wrong, what’s going on around this country. And I have had enough of it. I’m sick of it, and so are you.”

And there’s no question in my mind that he meant it. Biden has always had strong connections to working class America, unions, and the principles of fairness that Democrats have historically stood on. He has exactly the kind of Bona Fides the Democrats will need in 2020 to win crucial industrial states like Ohio, Indiana, Michigan and Pennsylvania. He could do it. He could beat Trump.

He could do it, that is, if we weren’t living in the Age of Twitter, where childish epithets, bullying, and “alternative facts” are more important than ideology, experience, and integrity.  And in the age of news-for-profit, where prurient click-bait has superseded actual news.

In the current environment, no Democrat, no matter how well qualified, can beat the Schoolyard-Name-Caller-In-Chief, and his official propaganda arm, FoxNews. What makes me so sure? Well, a headline story on the New York Times web page today, the first day of Biden’s official entry into the 2020 presidential race, was:

Joe Biden Expresses Regret to Anita Hill, but She Says ‘I’m Sorry’ Is Not Enough

See, about thirty years ago, Biden was chairman of the Judiciary Committee that questioned Anita Hill on her testimony against Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, and Biden didn’t do enough, according to Hill, to find witnesses that would corroborate her version of events.

This, not Biden’s support of the striking workers, or a million other issues more important in the fight to present a viable alternative to Trump, is what we must talk about today, and Biden is already on the defensive. He’s joined the circular firing squad of Democrats who will spend the next 18 months apologizing and explaining all their many and varied transgressions against the classes, individuals and institutions that are oh-so-important to the hordes of aggrieved victims that are potential Democratic voters.

The obsessions that will doom the Democrats once more: identity politics, grievance politics, and political correctness.

All that remains now to ensure a Tweety landslide is another run by Jill Stein.

Jill Stein votes

What’s to be done? Well, it’s tempting to try to play Trump’s game better than he does. Every time he refers to Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas”, she could say something like he would – “Who said that? Donald who? You mean Pinocchio?” Every time Trump calls someone like Tex Alles a name like “Dumbo”, the headline in the Failing New York Times should be something like “Tiny-handed, Bald, Comb-over Clown Calls Someone a Name”.

Tempting, for sure. Thing is, it’s been tried and it doesn’t work. When you get down in the mud with a pig, you both get dirty but the pig enjoys it.

No, another strategy is called for. Here’s my idea. Whenever a Democratic candidate is asked about some 60-year-old woman who has recently come forward to say that she was made to feel uncomfortable that time when the candidate “accidentally” brushed up against her in the lunch line in seventh grade and is now demanding an apology, the candidate should recite the following:

“I have done many foolish and regrettable things in my life. Like most of us, I guess. I owe many people apologies for my past transgressions, and I intend to honor my obligations by hearing out each of them, and sincerely apologizing in every case where an apology is called for. And I know there will be many. I will start to do this on the day after the election and finish when the grievance of every last person has been heard.

And now, here is what I intend to do to restore America’s place in the international community, to combat climate change, to deal with totalitarian regimes across the globe, to fight terrorism, to raise the wages of the American workers, to rebuild our infrastructure, and to restore the balance of powers and institutions of government that the current President has done so much to destroy.”

What do you think? Will it work?

Tweets are now law

On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump woke up, rubbed the sleep from his eyes, and tweeted,

“After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you”

It caught everyone by surprise – the generals in question, congress, his own White House staff, and everyone else, especially currently-serving transgender military personnel.

At the time, I wrote that we were now entering uncharted waters, that our current form of governance was something new and in need of a new descriptor, as “democracy” didn’t quite describe it anymore.

I said,

“Please be advised…? Thank you.” That’s it? That’s all it takes now to disrupt the lives of thousands? That’s all it takes to change policy? No bills passed in congress after a spirited debate? Not even an Executive Order? Just 140 characters randomly blasted out to the world?

But even I didn’t think anyone would confuse this egregious example of Trumpian chaos-creation with anything that actually had legal standing. Like everyone else, I figured the other two branches of government would play their assigned roles and remind everyone what was actually necessary to make law. And Trump wouldn’t really mind, since he has no real convictions on the subject and only wants to “win”. It would be just another chance to show his base that he believes as they do and that it’s the congress, media, liberals, political judges, etc. who are standing in their way.

How wrong I was.

Trump’s two Supreme Court appointees, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, joined the other “conservatives” today to rule 5-4 that the tweet is law until some other court says it isn’t. And, of course, if some other court does reject the tweet-law, it will ultimately find its way back to the same crew that ruled on it today.

So now the precedent is set. Trump tweets and we must obey. Can’t wait to find out what’s next.

 

Sore winner

During the run-up to the election, when so many people just didn’t believe they would ever have to say the words “President Trump”, many agonized over Tweety’s comments about the election being rigged, that there was massive voter fraud, that he may not accept the results, and so on. It was clear that his millions of followers were breathlessly awaiting his every Tweet, and eager to show their support for whatever he wanted them to do.

The legitimate fear throughout the land was that when he lost, he would rally the worst of them to violence in the streets. After the shocking election result, some took bitter consolation in thinking that at least this scenario was averted. It was also a given that impeachment proceedings would have immediately begun against President Crooked Hillary Clinton. Benghazi! Emails! So we were also spared that protracted convulsion.

What no one ever dreamed of was that even if he won, Tweety would continue to provoke violence in the streets. The Tweety era is proving to be far worse than we ever thought it would be, and we thought it would be pretty bad.

It’s very hard to understand Trump’s motives and behavior at this point, except if you embrace the notion that he is, in fact, deranged. He seems determined to fight with everyone, including loyalists, allies, and friends. He seems completely disinterested in the job of President. He seems to think his current role is an extension of his TV show, the ultimate purpose of which was to attract as many eyeballs as possible to publicize the brand and increase revenues.

During the campaign, Trump’s posture as provocateur and outsider helped distinguish him from a large field of aspirants. When the nomination was apparently in hand, all talk turned to when Trump would “pivot” from the vulgar flame-thrower to the serious candidate for office – when would he start to show he could be “presidential”? It seemed clear to everyone that his antics were inappropriate once he was the official standard-bearer of the Republican party.

Tweety himself often repeated the promise that he could be very presidential, “more presidential than anybody”, the most presidential except Lincoln.

Although he assured us of this capability repeatedly, he never acted on it during the campaign as he cruised to the nomination. He equated being presidential with being boring, and he isn’t boring.

It turned out he was on to something. The crazy-pants chaos candidate never wavered and actually won the election. It was stunning. Then all the talk turned to what would happen next – it was one thing to be so crazy before becoming the nominee, another to be so crazy before the election, and yet another to be so crazy while president! Something had to change. Obviously.

Many of us took comfort in President Obama’s serene assurances that the power of the Oval Office itself had a way of exerting itself on whoever sat there. Once in the job, any president would immediately be moved by the awesome responsibility and weight of the surroundings, and the reality that every word and gesture would now reverberate throughout the world, perhaps with terrible consequences. Obama said January 20, 2017 would be the day of a wake-up call for Trump.

But just as Trump refused to be presidential as a primary candidate, and just as he refused to be presidential as the nominee, and just as he refused to be presidential as President-elect, he has also refused to be presidential as President.

In fact, it isn’t a question of “refusing” to do it. He simply can’t be presidential. This is because he is and always has been manifestly unsuited to the role and because he can not rise to the challenge. The fact that he cannot “fake it”, which would be easy enough to do by simply surrounding yourself with professionals and keeping your mouth shut, speaks to his mental state.

He is who he is. There is nothing to be done about changing that. Only the 25th Amendment can help us now, and that is the longest of long-shots.

Section 4: Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Too much would have to happen that almost certainly won’t, starting with a Mike Pence mutiny.  I don’t think so.

pence

And it is not completely clear that we can ever go back to “normal” again when Trump is finally gone. The damage done by this man may well be permanent.

Trump boldly goes…

…to Afghanistan!

One thing you have to admit about President Donald J. Trump is that he has never wavered from his one overarching, bedrock principle: Look Out For Number One!

He doesn’t pussyfoot. He doesn’t flip-flop. He doesn’t waffle. What you see is what you get. Cover your own ass if you want to win and winning is all there is. There are no other issues or principles that matter.

A new poll shows that the Tweeter’s approval ratings in the three key rust belt states that gave him the presidency have not budged. He’s still their guy.

rust

Nothing matters to these people except “Obama is a Muslim” and “Lock Her Up”. Don’t bother reminding them of the Tweeter’s solemn pledge to get us out of the Afghan quagmire, tweeted (what else?) over and over again for years:

afghan

Yesterday, a breathless nation awaited his long-promised brilliant plan for defeating al Qaeda and the Taliban, and was rewarded with a bold new policy: Into the Quagmire! It’s the only way! Kabul or Bust! More troops for the generals! More fodder for the cannons! Any reports of my abandoning the platform I was elected on are Fake News!

Of course, this announcement was made in the brilliant Trumpian style of pre-blaming others for its eventual failure.  He said he had always relied on his instincts in the past, had been hugely successful doing so, and that his instincts had been to get out of Afghanistan. But “his generals” had now claimed this was wrong and so he will reluctantly follow their advice.

Perfect. If, somehow, doing the same thing we’ve been doing fruitlessly for 16 years now magically produces positive results, then Trump’s a genius and a visionary and the best leader we’ve ever had. If it produces nothing but more body bags and years of grief for everyone involved, well, Trump is still a genius and a visionary – remember those instincts of his? The generals are to blame and will certainly pay with a good, public, career-ruining Twitter-shaming at the appropriate time.

Winning!

Best of all, no one now remembers or cares about the events of last week. It was only a few days ago that we all realized we had reached a historical inflection point and that Trump had to go.  He couldn’t bring himself to unambiguously criticize Nazis. Completely unprecedented and inappropriate for an American president of any party.  Remember? That was the straw that broke the camel’s back! No? OK, then. Never mind.

And if you don’t remember last week, I won’t bother trying to remind you of the week before. That was when the world was going to end because Trump recklessly dared the North Koreans to do something in Guam. Fire and fury, baby.

Tweety is winning. And all you losers who want to doubt him can just go home to Loserville and enjoy your loserpalooza.

Eclipse hoax

They’re at it again. It’s the same old crowd of leftist intellectuals with their oh-so-fancy “science” degrees, probably financed by that extreme left-wing kook, George Soros. The same crowd who laughs at the people in the flyover states, calls them “deplorable”, and thinks they’re smarter than you.

Now they’re saying that in a couple of hours from now, there will be an “eclipse” of the sun across the United States. Don’t fall for it!

They want you to leave work and buy their special glasses. It’s the same old anti-American agenda we’ve seen a million times before. These are the same people who want you to think we landed on the moon in 1969, or that the polar ice cap is melting because human activity is changing the climate. The same people who want to cover up what really happened in Roswell.

They control the media and the banks and the government. Don’t let them control you!

It’s the same crowd that’s always claiming their “scientific method” allows them to predict things that will happen based on what’s already been “proven”. Now they’re telling you the sky will go dark in a little while. Don’t you believe it.

Who do they think they are? God? They don’t even think the Bible is true! Don’t fall for it.

It’s all a fake. Fake news. Fake science. I promise you this: if the sky actually does go dark this afternoon, I’ll personally take my kids out of home-school and down to the free clinic for an MMR shot. That’s how sure I am that these pointy-headed liberal “professors” are all wet.

Wake up, Sheeple!

 

 

Willie Mays Avenue

This week, we experienced another national paroxysm of “controversy”, the result of which is that a few more formerly obstinate people admitted what millions already found obvious: Donald J. Trump is a hyper-combative, utterly incompetent, ignorant narcissist who cannot do the job he finds himself in.

Also, he may or may not have proven himself to be a racist and Nazi sympathizer, though neither of those possibilities is nearly as important to the world as his utter incompetence.

On the plus side, a few monuments to the Confederacy have been torn down, thereby bringing the Civil War one baby step closer to conclusion, only 152 short years after the last shot was fired.

Also,  in some circles traveled only by the 1% , it has now become de rigueur to prove your bona fides on the subject of race by making some sort of gesture or speech about it, which doesn’t help all that much but doesn’t hurt either.

More than 40 years after the death of Tom Yawkey, Red Sox ownership is making little tiny noises about finally doing the right thing concerning the “legacy” of Tom Yawkey: killing it dead.

yawkey

Yawkey bought the Red Sox for himself a few days after he turned 30 years old in 1933 for $1.25 million, thereby sentencing the team and its die-hard fan base to decades of mediocrity. Yawkey had inherited $40 million from the lumber and iron empire built by his grandfather, and could finally access the money, having reached the age specified in the will.

Today, $40 million doesn’t buy that much. Maybe the privilege of watching David Price nurse a hangnail on the bench for two years, or maybe watching Pablo Sandoval eat hamburgers in the minors before recognizing you made another small mistake. But in 1933, it was real money.

Yawkey never earned or produced anything on his own, and treated the Red Sox as a private club, often taking batting practice with “his boys”.

He died in 1976, a year after the greatest World Series ever played, in which the Red Sox lost the seventh game and came up empty for the third time on his watch. They were one player short of success yet again.  The next year, Boston re-named part of Jersey St., on which Fenway Park’s main entrance sits, to Yawkey Way in honor of the great man. It’s been Yawkey Way since then.

In his day, most people in Boston thought Yawkey was a peach of a guy, and most had no problem with his views on black people. He didn’t like them. The Red Sox were the last team in baseball to put a black player on the field, waiting until 1959, and they did so half-heartedly. Pumpsie Green was the man’s name, a .246 hitter with zero power over his five year career.

green

The Red Sox had the chance to sign Jackie Robinson and they passed. They did give him a tryout in 1945. A newly elected city councilman, Isadore Muchnick, campaigned to bring black players to Boston, and refused the usual formality of granting permission for the Red Sox and Braves to play on Sundays, unless they gave some guys from the Negro Leagues a tryout.

A day before the 1945 opener, Yawkey had Jackie Robinson, then of the Kansas City Monarchs, take the field for a look, along with Marvin Williams and Sam Jethroe. “We knew we were wasting our time”, Jackie said years later. No one from the press was there, and the whole charade lasted just a few minutes. It ended when someone from the stands yelled out. “Get those n—ers off the field”.

In 1945, the Red Sox weren’t alone in their antipathy. But in 1949, two years after Jackie was already in the majors and the direction of history was clear, the Red Sox passed on a 17-year-old prospect named Willie Mays, who they could have signed for $4500.

In the 1950’s, the Red Sox could have, and should have, had Ted Williams in left, Willie Mays in center, and Jackie Robinson at second. But Yawkey was too smart for that. Why try to win games with guys you don’t like when it’s so much more fun to relax with the guys you like?

yaz

The above picture is Yawkey and Carl Yastrzemski, one of his favorites, after the “Impossible Dream” Red Sox backed into the 1967 World Series, surviving the closest pennant race in history.

Yaz had a season for the ages, playing a supernatural left field all year while winning the Triple Crown and M.V.P.  Wow.  He played great in the Series, too, hitting .400 with three home runs and an On Base Percentage of .500. He carried the team  into the seventh game, where the Red Sox put their Cy Young winner, Gentleman Jim Lonborg, on the mound with only two days rest to face the immortal Bob Gibson.  Gibson, of course, cruised to his third win of the Series, striking out ten and giving up only three hits, and ended the Red Sox season in the predictable fashion.

But a good time was had by all, right?

gibson

The Red Sox were short just one player, as usual. Just one Bob Gibson. Or Jackie Robinson. Or Willie Mays. And it took another 37 years on top of that to finally get over the hump.

yawkey1

Now John Henry, principal owner of the Red Sox, is entertaining suggestions for re-naming Yawkey Way.  I think “Willie Mays Avenue” would work.

My plan would be that the next time I’m down there on game day, and I overhear some kid saying to his father, “Dad, why is this ‘Willie Mays Avenue’?  Willie never played here!”,  I’ll look at them both sadly and say, “Exactly.”

Screwie speaks: Terrorism, Murder, War

I was sipping a gin-and-tonic on my tiny, urban “deck” yesterday, reflecting on how fast the summer speeds by when you’re living on the wrong side of the political looking glass, when I saw my cousin Screwie roll up at the end of the driveway on his fixie. He seemed agitated as he chained his bike to the railing with the “Do Not Chain Your Bike Here” sign on it. That boy is a born anarchist.

I didn’t quite hear what he was muttering as he came toward me – I just picked up the words “Not Terrorism”, so I knew I was in for an earful.

“Hey”, I said. “Want some gin?” I was just being polite as I saw that he had his usual six-pack of Pabst Blue Ribbon with him, and I knew I wasn’t going to have to get up. He plopped down in the other Adirondack chair.

“Anything wrong? You seem a little distracted. In fact you seem like you’re gonna pop a vessel”.

“Yes, there’s something wrong,” he sneered. “Barcelona is wrong. Barce. Fucking. Lona.”

“Yeah, such a great place. Awful. Terrorism”, I offered, knowing full well it didn’t matter what I said.

“Yes it’s awful,” he said, “But it’s not terrorism.”

“What are you talking about? Of course it’s terrorism. A twenty-something Jihadi drives a van through an unsuspecting crowd, killing a dozen or more, probably screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ for all I know. How do you figure it’s not terrorism?”

Screwie says, “Because there’s no ‘terrorist’ objective. Terrorism is meant to accomplish something – to get the victims to modify their behavior somehow. The bad guy wants you to ‘end the occupation’ or ‘release the political prisoners’ or ‘recognize the caliphate’ or ‘stop publishing cartoons that offend me’ or ‘stop supporting the apostate royalty’. Or something.

“Sometimes they just want you to be so uncomfortable and afraid you’ll move out of wherever you are and leave it to them. But terrorists want something, and the implication is that when you give it to them, they’ll quit blowing things up and go back to being humans.”

“Hmm”, I astutely responded. “So you’re saying the Barcelona guys had no ‘terrorist’ objective. I guess I see that. So, if it’s not terrorism, what do you think it is?”

“I think it’s murder. But it doesn’t matter what I think. It’s what they think that matters. Until we understand what they think they’re doing, there’s absolutely no hope we’ll ever get on top of it.”

“And what do they think it is, if I might be so bold to inquire?”, says I.

“They think it’s war. They have no objective beyond killing you. They don’t care if you promise to recognize the caliphate, or if you require everyone in Europe to wear a burqa or anything else. They just want you dead. If they lose two of theirs blowing up or running over eighty of yours, it’s a huge battlefield win. Multiply it by a zillion and you get the picture of what they think they’re doing. And the point is that the battlefield is everywhere in their war, not just Syria or Afghanistan or wherever else you might want to think it is.”

“Crack another PBR and try to enjoy what’s left of the summer”, I offer.

“Don’t be a wise-ass. No one likes a wise-ass. Look, remember after 9/11 when we all were trying to understand what it was about? ‘Why do they hate us?’ was the mantra.  Remember the Wall Street Journal guy who went up into the mountains so he could get the al Qaeda side of things, and put the word out so that we could all understand their thinking and their grievances? Daniel Pearl was his name.

pearl

“When he got there, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed cut his head off. We were all totally confused. Pearl was going to give them a platform and they killed him? Are they crazy? We still don’t get it.

“They don’t care about a platform. They don’t care about getting their message out to us. They don’t care about compromise or negotiations or getting you to do some particular thing, after which they’ll go back to being like everyone else. What they care about is making you dead.

“The reason we were so shocked by 9/11 and by every attack that’s come after is that we didn’t understand that they had declared war on us and were proceeding accordingly. We were arguing about whether their ‘crimes’  should be treated as civil or criminal offenses, where to try the bad guys and under what law, what rights they should have, and so on. And we’re still thinking that way.”

“So what are you saying?” My cousin’s getting inside my head now. “If treating these guys as terrorists or criminals isn’t going to work, what’s the right answer?”

Screwie seems a little spent now that he’s got these thoughts on the table. He takes a long pull on his beer and says, “That’s above my pay grade. But I’ll tell you this – Step One is to understand what they think they’re doing and we’re not close. It’s the third-rail of political incorrectness to agree with them that it’s all-out war. And who needs it? I’d rather sit here and drink beer than go out and shoot someone. Who wouldn’t?

“But it’s really not so hard to take Step One if you’re up to it. It should have been done long ago. Bin Laden put it right out there in black and white in his 1998 Fatwa. Why not take him at his word? Like the other side does.”

“Huh? Remind me”, I respond with my usual brilliance.

“It’s short and sweet”, Screwie says. “I have the important part committed to memory. It says,

The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies—civilians and military—is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it… “

The sun was starting to set. I looked up the end of the driveway and saw a kid with bolt cutters working on Screwie’s bike lock. But I didn’t mention it. Why stir things up?

Here’s what will happen next

The President of the United States has made it clear to White Supremacists, Neo-Nazis, and their sympathizers that they have a friend in the White House, that their voice is welcomed in the national discourse, that their concerns will not be marginalized. They will have a seat at the table and equal time as needed to make their points.

You’re probably wondering how the Republic can now endure. Clearly, we have reached a historic precipice and whatever happens next will impact us all for years to come. Whatever principles we thought we were fighting for in World War II have been abandoned, and new principles are taking their place. Clearly, there is no longer any doubt that Donald J. Trump is unfit and must be removed from office, one way or another.

It’s all a bit unnerving and I’m sure you’d like a little guidance as we stare into the abyss.

Well, you’ve come to the right place. Due to the exceptionally clear internet weather we have recently been experiencing, plus the well-known GOML clairvoyance on issues such as these, we can now tell you exactly what will happen next. Ready?

Nothing.

Exactly nothing will now happen to Donald J. Trump.

This latest firestorm will not occupy our attention as long as “Obama Tapped My Wires” or “Grab Them By The Pussy”. The news cycle has already started to move on with the van attack in Barcelona, followed by some exceptionally absurd tweeting from you-know-who about how General Pershing soaked his bullets in pig’s blood, thereby scaring Muslims out of terrorism for 25 years (carefully adding that you won’t find this in “some” history books. The fake ones, I guess.).

It’s now Tweety’s favorite time: time to “fight back”. No one does it better or enjoys it more.

fight

Re: Charlottesville, the subject has already been changed. Instead of discussing why the former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan is congratulating the President on his courage, honesty and support, we will discuss whether Robert E. Lee occupies an important place in American history. Controversial!

Instead of asking why Tweety thinks counter-protesters are as bad as Nazis, or why he thinks they had no permit to assemble when they did, or why he is saying there were “many good people” supporting the “Unite the Right” rally when he can’t point to a single one, we will debate whether the “Alt-left” is a terrorist threat.

And right on cue, a State Senator from Missouri has stepped into the snare, saying she wished Trump would be killed. See? What’d we tell ya? The left is worse than the right! Nazis get very unfair treatment from the Fake News.

The goalposts have already been moved. There will be some hours of discussion where much evidence is produced that Tweety was right all along – that some people on the left are as bad as any on the right, that those who wish to honor our confederate past have been improperly silenced and bullied, that the fake media is fake, etc. etc.

Oh, and I almost forgot – the mayor of Chicago is now being asked to remove statues of George Washington because “It’s time”. Just like the Tweeter-in-Chief predicted! Now who’s the idiot, huh?

Political cover has already been granted to the professionals. Anodyne statements condemning racism and anti-semitism have been issued by former presidents and current congressmen. So brave! Seriously – was anyone going to issue a statement saying racism and anti-semitism weren’t really so bad? The President is not mentioned by name, except by the handful of usual suspects who are then personally attacked and dismissed as envious losers.

James Murdoch wrote a “personal letter” about it and pledged a million dollars to the Anti-Defamation League. Steve Cohen, a Democratic congressman from Tennessee says he will file articles of impeachment.

It’s all whispering in the hurricane, kids. Tweety is immune from such trifles. To quote the man himself, “Watch!”

As is to be expected, Tweety is already on the record with his own all-purpose condemnations of racism, thereby inoculating himself from his own disease and preemptively refuting evidence to the contrary.  As always, he has made sure that he has said something, however vague, that can prove he was correct from the get-go about anything and everything that might come up. The man has never been wrong once.

Apart from lack of any movement on the real issue here (bringing the Tweety era to a close), there actually will be some positive changes on the ground, although mainly only symbolic ones which will not stop the “free speech vs. hate speech” debate treadmill we just stepped on. Some Confederate monuments will finally be removed and some planned “Unite the Right” events will be cancelled. We repeat: Not The Point.

And late night comics are doing some great work. I particularly like this Jimmy Kimmel rant. Enjoy.

Leo Frank and the logic of the alt-Right

If you’re like a lot of other people, this week you’re scratching your head trying to figure out what Nazis chanting anti-semitic slogans have to do with removing Civil War monuments. GOML is here to help.

First, let’s just clear the air about what Charlottesville was about. It was a “Unite The Right” rally, not particularly focused on the Civil War, and one of many planned in various parts of the country. There are nine similar rallies planned for next week alone in places like L.A., Pittsburgh, New York, Seattle, and the Google campus in Mountain View.

Turning this into a discussion of taking down symbols of the Confederacy is misdirection.

And, just for the record, here’s what Robert E. Lee said when asked about building a monument to the Confederate troops at Gettysburg:

“I think it wiser not to keep open the sores of war but to follow the examples of those nations who endeavored to obliterate the marks of civil strife, to commit to oblivion the feelings engendered.”

“As regards the erection of such a monument as is contemplated, my conviction is, that however grateful it would be to the feelings of the South, the attempt in the present condition of the Country, would have the effect of retarding, instead of accelerating its accomplishment; [and] of continuing, if not adding to, the difficulties under which the Southern people labour.”

And one other point: for all you Southerners who insist the Confederate side was not fighting to preserve the institution of slavery, but rather resisting the encroachment of federal government on the rights of the states to govern themselves, please be quiet. The only “States’ Rights” that anyone cared about was the right to continue the institution of slavery, on which the southern economy was based, and in which white southerners, in the main, deeply believed.

Still, the South is the natural place to try to “unite the right”, as racist and anti-semitic bacteria has always seemed to find a friendly petri-dish in which to grow there. The connection between white southern grievance and “foreigners” is central here in the thinking that outsiders are coming to take their jobs away and control them.

The belief of the various White Nationalist groups has always been that Jews would control and undermine local businesses, that the migration of black people to the North would  saturate the labor market, and that Catholics would steal the rest of the jobs from Americans.

That’s the crux right there: for these people, Jews, African-Americans, and Catholics are not “Americans”.

The KKK and the Anti-Defamation league were both born in the South at the same time, precipitated by the same event. They arose following the death of Leo Frank. Or, to be more accurate, the lynching of Leo Frank. Today is a good day to remind everyone who Leo Frank was because it was on this day, August 17, in 1915 that he was murdered.

Leo Frank was a 31-year old mechanical engineer, working in his uncle’s pencil factory in  Atlanta. Frank had graduated from Cornell in 1906, where he had been on the debate team, his class basketball and tennis teams, played a lot of chess, and was generally a happy and well-adjusted guy. He moved to Atlanta in 1908 and married in 1910. He was active in the Jewish community in Atlanta and became president of the B’nai B’rith fraternal society there in 1912.

He was accused (wrongly, as almost every scholar and historian now agrees) of the strangulation murder of Mary Phagan, a 13-year-old child of the confederacy from nearby Marietta.

He was convicted at trial primarily on the testimony given by the janitor, Jim Conley, who most historians now agree was the actual perpetrator. The verdict was appealed all the way to the Supreme Court on the basis that the trial was a travesty and that the verdict was driven by anti-semitism.

Frank had been sentenced to death, but the sentence was commuted to life in prison. From this Wiki:

The case attracted national press and many reporters deemed the conviction a travesty. Within Georgia, this outside criticism fueled antisemitism and hatred toward Frank. On August 16, 1915, he was kidnapped from prison by a group of armed men and lynched at Marietta, Mary Phagan’s hometown, the next morning. The new governor vowed to punish the lynchers, who included prominent Marietta citizens, but nobody was charged. In 1986, Frank was posthumously pardoned by the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, although not officially absolved of the crime. 

The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913, with the Frank case being specifically mentioned by the founder, Adolf Kraus. Also, from the Frank Wiki:

After Frank’s lynching, around half of Georgia’s 3,000 Jews left the state. According to author Steve Oney, “What it did to Southern Jews can’t be discounted … It drove them into a state of denial about their Judaism. They became even more assimilated, anti-Israel, Episcopalian. The Temple did away with chupahs at weddings – anything that would draw attention.” Many American Jews saw Frank as an American Alfred Dreyfus, both of whom were seen as victims of antisemitic persecution.

And the Klan was also revived by the trial:

Two weeks after the lynching, in the September 2, 1915 issue of The Jeffersonian, Watson wrote, “the voice of the people is the voice of God”, capitalizing on his sensational coverage of the controversial trial. In 1914, when Watson began reporting his anti-Frank message, The Jeffersonian’s circulation had been 25,000; by September 2, 1915, its circulation was 87,000. On November 25, 1915, a group led by William Joseph Simmons burned a cross on top of Stone Mountain, inaugurating a revival of the Ku Klux Klan.

The ADL and the KKK have remained on opposite sides of many arguments in the century since these events. Until the Tweety administration, the momentum of history was clearly operating against the forces of intolerance, as it became less and less acceptable  to hang on to or espouse the old views. And in recent decades, Jewish Americans have felt less pressure to deny their heritage to gain acceptance as Americans.

For reasons best known only to himself, the President of the United States has chosen this moment to once again release the genie of hatred from its bottle. Leo Frank is not resting peacefully tonight.

hat3

The death of the “dead ball”

On this day in 1920, Ray Chapman died, and so did the way baseball was played up until that point.

Chapman’s death signaled the end of the “Dead Ball” era and, in theory, the end of many of the “tricks” pitchers used to fool hitters, including the spit-ball, the scuff-ball, the grease-ball, the carved-up-on-my-belt-buckle-ball, and so on.

Chapman was a 29-year-old infielder for the Indians, their best, and was noted for hanging in tough against any pitcher and his willingness to “take one for the team”, i.e. getting hit by a pitch to get to first base. In his nine-year career, he had led the league in runs scored once, walks once, and plate appearances once. A solid guy.

On August 16, 1920, in the fifth inning of a game against the Yankees at the Polo Grounds, he stepped in to hit against Carl Mays, a submarine style pitcher who liked to throw inside. Mays hit Chapman on the left temple and the sound made by the impact reverberated through the Polo Grounds giving the fans the impression the pitch had been hit by Chapman. The ball hit him so hard that although he had been hit on the left temple, he bled from his right ear.

Chapman went down, was helped up and back to the dugout by team-mates, and died twelve hours later. The last words he uttered on a baseball field were, “I’m all right. Tell Mays not to worry”.

It was the only case of a player being killed by a pitch at the major league level, although there have been several serious and career-ending incidents since then.

Statistically, Mays had been a very good pitcher indeed, and went on to win over 200 games before he was done, including five seasons of 20 or more. He was a potential Hall-of-Famer and was last on the Veteran’s Committee ballot in 2007, when he was turned down for the final time. Most people say it was his complete lack of remorse for the Chapman incident that kept him out.  “It’s not on my conscience,” Mays said 50 years later, just before his death in 1971. “It wasn’t my fault.”

At the time of the incident, umpires Billy Evans and William Dineen issued a statement that blamed Mays:

“No pitcher in the American League resorted to a trickery more than Carl Mays in attempting to rough a ball, in order to get a break on it which would make it difficult to hit.” 

The next year, the rules about what kind of baseballs were allowed in play were changed. Until then, the same few balls were used throughout the game, and became very difficult for hitters to see after a few innings of abuse. After that, new, more tightly wound balls were used, and new ones were brought in whenever a ball was no longer white enough for a hitter to see clearly. The balls could be seen better and traveled farther when hit.

The “lively ball” era was born, and the home run would be king from then on. In 1919, the greatest slugger in baseball history and always a statistical outlier, Babe Ruth, led the league with 29 home runs, a total that exceeded the entire output for ten of the other MLB teams that year. In 1920, he hit 54 which exceeded the total for every other major league team except the Phillies, who had 64 in aggregate. Apart from Ruth’s 54, the 1920 Yankees had only 61 home runs hit by all other players combined.

But after the Chapman incident, the trend started changing radically, and, by 1930 the long ball was firmly established everywhere. The pitchers, or at least those that didn’t cheat, had lost their biggest advantages.

mays1

chapman

President violates Twitter T.O.S.

The In-House Corporate Counsel here at GOML has issued a strongly worded memo which will shortly be sent to Omid Kordestanti, the Executive Chairman of Twitter, and Jack Dorsey, its C.E.O.

The memo points out that the President of the United States is in clear violation of the Twitter Terms Of Services (T.O.S.) agreement that all users must abide by, and should have his account de-activated immediately, not only for the protection of the innocent people he routinely harasses using the social media site, but also to prevent further de-stabilization of the U.S. political and social landscape, and to improve the diplomatic climate on which world peace depends.

The memo sites the T.O.S agreement, noting particularly the “Abusive Behavior” element of the “Twitter Rules”:

We believe in freedom of expression and in speaking truth to power, but that means little as an underlying philosophy if voices are silenced because people are afraid to speak up. In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs, we do not tolerate behavior that crosses the line into abuse, including behavior that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.

It is a regular and predictable event that when someone is mildly or even inadvertently critical, or is simply perceived to be critical of the President, that person will certainly be attacked and insulted via Twitter. Those attacks are exactly “behavior that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.”

Before yesterday, the most recent example had been Mitch McConnell, who made the mistake of mentioning that the President was new to the job and may not yet fully appreciate what’s involved in getting laws passed. This is something the Trump camp itself has repeated often as a way to emphasize Trump’s “outsider” bona fides, so McConnell certainly wouldn’t have thought himself to be attacking Trump. But Trump turned on him using Twitter.

But there’s no need to dissect that particular instance. The New York Times has kept a running account of Trump’s Twitter attacks on others.  There are hundreds and hundreds.

There is no question that these attacks are meant to silence criticism, and no question that they do so effectively. After the Alt-Right violence in Virginia a few days ago, Trump’s tepid and inappropriate response resulted in several CEO’s leaving his Management Advisory Counsel, starting with Merck CEO, Kenneth Frazier, followed immediately by the predictable Twitter attack-tirade from Trump.

Frazier was soon followed out by the Intel and Under Armor CEOs, but others stayed with Trump, not wanting to jeopardize their relations with a business-favoring White House, and, more importantly, not wanting to incur the Twitter-wrath of the POTUS. Who would want to be the subject of an attack-tweet from the leader of the free world?

Even Mrs. Stewie Generis, sipping coffee across the table from me as I write these words, is warning me to be careful what I write as there is a possibility that Trump could single us out and we wouldn’t want that!

In explaining why other CEOs and business leaders, e.g. Michael Dell, Jeff Immelt, and Richard Trumka, have issued statements abhorring racism but stayed with Trump and not endorsed Frazier’s actions, Michael Strain, an economist at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said,

“I’m sure that corporate leaders feel some reticence to speak out because they’re afraid of being attacked by the president by name.”

Exactly! And exactly what violates the Twitter T.O.S.

So what should you do to support the effort to ban the President from Twitter? Spread the word. Write a letter to the Twitter management team. Carry signs. Get a bumper sticker made. Start an online petition at Change.org. Get involved!

You are hereby granted permission to cite the GOML legal team in your efforts and you should know we’ll be right behind you every step of the way.

Right up until that first attack-tweet hits us – then we’re out. I’m sure you understand.

attack

Hi, I’m Glen Campbell

One of the biggest problems with the Tweety Administration is that it sucks the life out of the news cycle – there’s simply no oxygen left for anything that doesn’t have the word “Trump” in it. It sucks the life out of the news, and out of culture, and out of the internet. This week it even seemed like it might suck the life out of life itself.

So I forgive you if you didn’t note the passing last week of Glen Campbell at age 81. Maybe you never saw a link to click on to read about it, or maybe you ignored the link and thought, “Yeah, I get it. Wichita Lineman, Galveston, country music dude. So what? Struggled with alcoholism, addiction, and ultimately Alzheimer’s? Yeah, like a lot of people. Boo Hoo.”

I admit that my own first thought was that I didn’t need to think too much about the guy who had that All American, red white and blue, clean-as-a-whistle TV show, “The Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour”, from 1969-1972, at the height of the Viet Nam War, when what we needed was the exact opposite.

But then I remembered Glen Campbell the musician. That boy could play.

His solo career took off with the release of “Gentle On My Mind” in 1967. That changed everything for him, and was the start of whatever most people know about him.

But before that, Glen Campbell was a charter member of The Wrecking Crew, the group of studio musicians that played on virtually every record produced in Los Angeles in the 1960’s and early 1970’s. And I mean everything. From Sinatra and Dean Martin, to Elvis, Nat King Cole, Bobby Darin, Ricky Nelson, Jan and Dean, The Monkees, the Ronettes, The Mamas and the Papas, Bob Dylan. If it was produced in L.A., Glen Campbell probably played on it. All genres, all styles, all tempos, all arrangements.

If you want to find out who was really playing on all those Beach Boys or Byrds records or who really was Phil Spector’s “Wall of Sound”, there’s a Netflix documentary for you to stream called “The Wrecking Crew”. As a bonus, you’ll also find out something about the greatest female musician you never heard of, Carole Kaye.

Check out the T.A.M.I. Show sometime for a trip down Memory Lane, and to get a tiny feel for their versatility. They played every tune for that show.

Even after Glen Campbell became a household name and a huge star, he returned often to the studio to continue playing with them on other people’s records. That’s how good they were and how much they enjoyed playing together.

Playing with The Wrecking Crew meant you were one of the best studio players in the profession, meaning you were one of the best professional musicians in the country. You couldn’t make a mistake – it was expensive to make a record, and there was no budget for overtime for the band or to keep the studio an extra hour. Campbell mainly played rhythm guitar, as he never learned to read music beyond chord charts, but his musicianship was as good as there was.

Glen was a modest and self-effacing guy, the seventh of twelve children born to a poor family in Arkansas. They had no electricity. He picked cotton for $1.25 per hundred pounds, and said, “A dollar in those days looked as big as a saddle blanket.”

He got a five-dollar guitar when he was four and his dad made a capo for it out of a corncob and a nail. He was playing on local radio by the time he was six. He never had any formal musical training, practiced after working in the fields, and admired Django Reinhardt more than any other player he’d heard.

He dropped out of school at 14, worked menial jobs and moved to New Mexico at 17 to start his career as a musician with his uncle’s band. He moved to L.A. at 23 and began work as a session musician, and you know the rest.

He died last week in Nashville, six years after first being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. He was great at what he did and made a lot of people happy.

glen2

Youthful Success

glen 3

D.U.I.

glen1

Alzheimer’s

Happy birthday, Social Security

On August 14, 1935, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law, thereby creating a “safety net” for retirees who may not have saved enough to get by on their own after they stopped working. Unemployment was close to the all-time 1933 high of 24% in 1935, still at about 20%, with over 10 million unemployed.

At the time of the enactment, there were 37 workers paying in to the system for every retiree drawing out of it. Life expectancy was 61 years in 1935, so fewer people ever got to the point of collecting, and those that did collected for a much shorter time than they would today.

Today, there are only three workers paying in to the system for every retiree receiving benefits, and this number is expected to shrink even further going forward. The average life expectancy is now about 85, so many more people will collect Social Security and for much much longer.

Something’s got to give. The main problem, as we have seen most recently in the A.C.A. Repeal/Replace effort, is that once an entitlement is put in place, it is very, very hard indeed to take it away.

The apparent solutions to the new SSA math would be to extend the age of retirement so that there would be fewer retirees collecting for shorter periods, and also to institute further means tests for benefits. But it isn’t that simple.

The problem is  compounded by pressures on corporate leadership to reduce all benefits to employees, which are the biggest drag on their profits, the poor job prospects for older workers in the digital age, the freedom of a poorly-regulated financial industry to siphon off large chunks of “retirement” savings in the form of fees,  and the inevitable migration of jobs to cheaper labor markets.

dil1

I suppose all this is one of the main causes of younger people’s resentment against the Baby Boomer generation. Their view of it is the Boomers are selfish, entitled, and want to get paid now, while flipping off their kids and grand-kids who will have to fend for themselves. Again, it’s not that simple.

boomer1

Speaking as a Boomer who paid in to this pyramid scheme for decades, I certainly do want to get paid now, and, yes, I feel entitled to it. If that makes me selfish in the bargain, then so be it.

I fully understand that when the revolution begins, they will be coming for me first. Keep your eye out for me on the bread line – I’ll be the one carrying the sign that says, “Will work for C.O.P.D. meds”.

 

Jews go home!

Amos Oz, the Israeli author, is famously quoted as saying,

‘When my father was a little boy in Poland, the streets of Europe were covered with graffiti, “Jews, go back to Palestine,” or sometimes worse: “Dirty Yids, piss off to Palestine.” When my father revisited Europe fifty years later, the walls were covered with new graffiti, “Jews, get out of Palestine.”’

The idea that there was a need to found a Jewish national homeland gained momentum in the late 1800’s, as Jews all over Europe and the Russian Empire came to understand that assimilation would never be truly possible, that they would always be the “other”and that this almost always meant persecution and often murder. They were beginning to understand that they could never rely on the protection of their “hosts” to live and worship freely. The second World War and its aftermath finally proved to everyone the truth and importance of this idea, the name of which is “Zionism”.

The problem has always been where “home” would be. Even though Jews have lived in the “holy land” continuously for thousands of years, many centuries before the birth of Mohammed, they are regarded as intruders as much there as everywhere else. There are virtually no Arabs or Muslims, or Americans of Arab or Muslim descent for that matter, who believe that the State of Israel has a right to exist as anything other than a temporary expedient. The “two-state solution” is an invention of the western liberal imagination. It has never been a real possibility.

Helen Thomas, the daughter of Lebanese immigrants,  was the first female officer of the National Press Club. She was best known as a member of the White House press corps for many years, and covered ten presidents. She always spoke her mind, as this episode from Wikipedia recounts:

Rabbi David Nesenoff of RabbiLive.com, on the White House grounds with his son and a teenage friend for a May 27, 2010, American Jewish Heritage Celebration Day, questioned Thomas as she was leaving the White House via the North Lawn driveway. When asked for comments on Israel, she replied: “Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.” and “Remember, these people are occupied and it’s their land. It’s not German, it’s not Poland…” When asked where Israeli Jews should go, she replied they could “go home” to Poland or Germany or “America and everywhere else. Why push people out of there who have lived there for centuries?” When accused of being an anti-Semite, she responded that she is a Semite, having an Arab background. 

As was often the case, Thomas was merely giving voice to what many were thinking.

Last night at the University of Virginia, there was a torchlight parade of hundreds of White Nationalists chanting “Jews will not replace us”. Of course University administrators were “deeply saddened” by this, but declared that,

 “We believe that diversity is an essential element of excellence, and that intolerance and exclusion inhibit progress. We also support the First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. These rights belong to the ‘Unite the Right’ activists who will express their beliefs, and to the many others who disagree with them.”

Anti-semitic speech is protected, as has been affirmed often in the past. The “Right” has permission to say what they want against the Jews, and in recent years, the “Left” has joined the chorus with gusto.

To the left, the very idea that the Jewish people can and should have a national homeland, i.e. Zionism, is “racist”.  And the Star of David has come to represent not just the State of Israel (and therefore “racism”), but all Jews everywhere. The distinction between an individual Jew living in San Francisco versus the State of Israel itself has been wiped out now on the left as it had always been on the right.

In Chicago recently, there was an LGBT “Dyke March” in which some Jewish members of the community displayed their solidarity with a Star of David on the rainbow flag. They were expelled from the parade as the flag “made people feel unsafe.”

pride

Their conclusion was they they were allowed to be gay or Jewish, but not both at the same time. That would be Pinkwashing, the Israeli (i.e. “Jewish”) crime of pretending to support gay rights as a way to discredit the Arab/Muslim culture and somehow justify “occupation”. And, if you follow the history of the way “occupation” has been used, you will understand that it now means the very existence of Israel.

The Dyke March tweeted  on July 13, “Zio tears replenish my electrolytes.”

Okay. We get it. The Jews in Israel have to go home. The Jews in Europe and Russia have to go home. The Jews at the University of Virginia have to go home. The Jews in the LGBT community have to go home. We’re all agreed. Right, Left, and Center.

And all over the world. The U.N. hasn’t proven itself very useful over the years in solving world problems, but the one thing it has always done well is condemn Israel loudly, unanimously (except, usually, for the pariah U.S.A.), and continuously in resolution after resolution, twenty of them in 2016 alone.

Perhaps now would be the time for the U.N. to propose a final solution to the Jewish question.

Tweeting towards Armageddon

Only 200 days into the current administration and we are apparently on the brink.  Another brilliant accomplishment for the man-baby!

The last time talk of nuclear strikes was so public and scary was in October, 1962.  The Soviet Union had installed missiles in Cuba, and President Kennedy had to figure out what to do about it.  He understood that the greatest threat he faced during the crisis was the accidental triggering of an action because of a misunderstanding, a misperception, or a miscommunication.  He was very careful with the words he used and strictly controlled the messages coming from others in his administration.

He had read Barbara Tuchman’s “The Guns of August” not long before, a book which focuses on how WWI got started, and the thought of just how easy it was to blunder into war was very much on his mind.  He asked his generals how many Americans would die  if a single missile struck the U.S., and was told 600,000.  He immediately pointed out that this was more than all the casualties of the Civil War, and that we hadn’t come close in 100 years.

J.F.K. had served with distinction in the Navy in WWII, and was a serious student of war, history, and the presidency.  He had a lot to draw on to make the important decisions needed, and he succeeded in averting war and getting the missiles out of Cuba.

Donald J. Trump, on the other hand, brags of never having read a book, successfully dodged military service, and demonstrates over and over that he knows little of war, history or the presidency.

The bluster that’s been coming out of North Korea has rarely been taken seriously in recent years, and Kim Jong Un has been regarded as an eccentric, somewhat comical pariah.  But with Tweety carrying the nuclear football, things have changed.  His “leadership style” is the same as that of Kim Jong Un. They both “value” unpredictability and will say anything.  In the case of Donald J. Trump, his “thoughts” almost always take the form of 140-character tweets, and they are never validated or vetted by anyone else beforehand.  Tweet first, ask questions later is the rule he has lived by.

This is an excellent recipe for the accidental triggering of nuclear war.  But unlike incendiary tweeting on other subjects, there will be little opportunity for walking it all back, “explaining” what was really meant, or blaming others as is his wont (there is already some viral disinformation blaming Bill Clinton for North Korea’s nuclear program).

I would imagine there are very few Europeans, for example, who would say there is any difference between Trump and Kim at this point – neither can be trusted and neither seems to be making any more sense than the other.

In 200 days, Trump has managed to reduce the status of President of the United States to the level eccentric, somewhat comical pariah.

But in the mind of the man-baby, “standing up” to Kim in this way is a unique “accomplishment”, and completed faster than anyone else in history!  Best of all, talk of Russian meddling in the election has been knocked off the internet, and everyone knows your approval ratings get a huge bump when you start a war!

Well done.

nuke

Catch-22 still sucks

The most eagerly awaited movie of 1970, and maybe ever, was Catch-22. Joseph Heller’s book was so beloved by so many that the idea it would be made into a movie with a big budget and an all-star cast was thrilling.

Wunderkind Mike Nichols, fresh off the triumphs of “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf” and “The Graduate”, was tapped to direct and Buck Henry, the writer of “The Graduate”, would do the screenplay.  Everyone who was anyone in movies was in the cast – even the great Orson Welles had a memorable part.

We just couldn’t wait to see it on the big screen.  And then the big day came, and there was near-universal disappointment with the result.  What went wrong?

Well first, when expectations run as high as they did in this case, the only possible outcome is negative.  Second, not everybody was completely disappointed.  Vincent Canby, the film critic of the New York Times, said it was “quite simply, the best American film I’ve seen this year”.

One criticism that almost everyone agreed on, even Canby,  was that the movie would be incomprehensible to anyone who hadn’t read the book.  Nichols clouds the issue with lots of flashbacks, hallucinations, and other ambiguities that confuse the audience further.

The book was a huge feast of characters and situations and no one could imagine how it could all be successfully boiled down to a two hour film, and of course, they were right.  The right answer would have been to make a longer movie or just not do it.

Roger Ebert, then only three years on the job at the Chicago Sun-Times, placed all the blame on Nichols:

 The movie recites speeches and passages from the novel, but doesn’t explain them or make them part of its style.

No, Nichols avoids those hard things altogether, and tries to distract us with razzle-dazzle while he sneaks in a couple of easy messages instead. Pushovers. In the first half of the movie, he tells us officers are dumb and war doesn’t make sense. In the second half, he tells us war is evil and causes human suffering. We already knew all that; we knew it from every other war movie ever made.

And that’s the problem: Nichols has gone and made another war movie, the last thing he should have made from ‘Catch-22.’ Nichols has been at pains to put himself on the fashionable side and make a juicy humanist statement against war, not realizing that for Heller World War II was symbolic of a much larger disease: life.

I saw the excellent “Dunkirk” the other day and it got me thinking about some aspects of WWII, particularly the air war.  I got a few books from the library and re-watched a couple of other flicks, including “Twelve O’Clock High” with Gregory Peck, and Catch-22, which I hadn’t seen in 47 years.  I was thinking maybe it would age well, particularly as memory of the book faded and expectations were zero.

Nope.  It still sucks.

Ebert, Canby, and apparently everyone else, are missing the real problem: Buck Henry’s screenplay.  Henry’s idea seems to have been to lift some of the memorable funny and absurd bits of dialog from the book and build his screenplay around these set pieces.  Major Major explaining he’ll only see people when he’s not there, General Dreedle giving the order to “shoot this man”, Doc Daneeka explaining the Catch that keeps him from grounding Yossarian, Nately getting a lecture from an old Italian man about the advantages of losing the war, etc. etc.

Henry roughs in some connective tissue around these comic SNL-like sketches and, Voila!  As Delroy Lindo said in “Get Shorty”, you just put in some commas and shit and you’re done.

Remember the glaring weakness that the beloved TV show M*A*S*H had?  It was the cartoonish portrayal of Frank Burns (Larry Linville).  He was way past being a buffoon – he just wasn’t believable on any level, and it detracted from the whole.  Well, virtually every depiction in Catch-22 has way too much of Frank Burns – so many over-the-top and silly characters, and Henry himself sets the tone as Lt. Colonel Korn.  Watch what he does playing this character to understand the problem with the whole.

Buck Henry may be a good writer, but he really screwed this thing up.  His screenplay is why Catch-22 is not a good movie.

catch

Republicans rising

In recent weeks, Tweety has made something of a point of complaining that a simple majority of 51  senators is not enough to enact his agenda, and that the filibuster rule, which generally works to require 60 votes, needs to go.

fili

Like everything else that flies out of his Twitter, he got these ideas from watching “Fox & Friends”, where people like Sean Duffy, Republican representative from Wisconsin, are putting it forward.

duffy

For the moment, we have seen that even abandoning the filibuster rule wouldn’t be enough, as only 48 Republicans voted for repeal of the A.C.A., but you can be assured that the Republicans will do whatever they feel they need to, rules and tradition and bi-partisanship be damned, as was shown in the case of the Gorsuch vote (Tweety’s only “accomplishment” to date).

But they may not have to change the rules. Republican voters may give them what they need to get over 60 senators. Duffy pointed out that, since the passage of the A.C.A seven years ago, Republicans have gained “1000 seats” nationwide.  Politifact confirms the truth of this scary fact.

The big gains are mainly in state legislatures. Ballotpedia notes that the Republican Party held more seats in 82 of 99 state legislative chambers (82.3 percent) in January 2017 than it did in January 2009.

“During President Barack Obama’s two terms in office, Democrats experienced a net loss of 968 state legislative seats, the largest net loss of state legislative seats in this category since World War II. The second-largest loss occurred following Dwight D. Eisenhower’s two terms in office, when Republicans were handed a net loss of 843 state legislative seats.

In addition, Democrats have lost  their majority of seats in the Senate, as well as over 60 seats in the House. And 12 governorships, too.

I don’t know whether six months of Trump has done anything to stem this rising tide, but I doubt it. The “Lock Her Up – No Regerts” crowd is still firmly behind their man as far as I can tell, even while the reality-based voters are more and more sickened by the incompetence, recklessness, greed, vulgarity, mendacity, and willful ignorance of the current administration.

This article sums up our feelings well, but until it appears somewhere other than the eastern elite lying fake media, it just doesn’t matter.

fear

 

Do not become deceased

When dealing with the police, that should always be Rule #1: Do Not Become Deceased.

The woman in Minnesota who became deceased last week after calling police about what she thought might be an attack behind her home can be forgiven for not keeping this rule in mind. She was from Australia and perhaps was not aware of her duty in this instance.

deceased

Since she failed to follow this common sense rule, she was unable to resolve the issue that she originally called about. Maybe there had been a rape behind her home as she suspected, or perhaps something else. We’ll never know now. What happened when the police responded to her call was explained by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension this way:

“Upon police arrival, a female ‘slaps’ the back of the patrol squad. After that, it is unknown to BCA agents what exactly happened, but the female became deceased in the alley.”

Clearly, the woman should not have become deceased at this time, and perhaps the incident that she called about could have been resolved had she been more careful about meeting this obligation.

This unfortunate lapse has led to the resignation of the Minneapolis Police Chief, and the placing on “administrative leave” of two Minneapolis police officers, which is clearly a tragedy that could have been avoided.

So remember, kids, if you think you might need to call the police for some reason, be sure you are prepared to meet your obligation to not become deceased. If you can’t do that one simple thing, well, there’s just no point in calling them at all.

 

 

Please be advised…

We are apparently now living under a new form of government, the name for which is yet to be coined. It has major elements in common with “kakistocracy”, “kleptocracy”, and “plutocracy”, but none of those terms describe it precisely. “Idiocracy” doesn’t quite get the essence of it either. Neither does “dictatorship”, at least not yet.

But the ground is shifting beneath us daily, and could tilt more completely to any of these designations at any time. And then shift and veer more towards another, or something totally different the following day. I’m leaning towards “Twitterocracy” as the most accurate for now, given recent events.

Two quick examples from just yesterday make good indicators of this new paradigm.

The first is the President of the United States, using his own internet account, and with no consultation with anyone else, impulsively “Tweeting” an attack on a U.S. Senator in his own party, for casting a vote that he disapproves of.

lisa

This is an insidious change in our national discourse. Murkowski, and every other congressperson, is not an employee of the president, and not appointed by him. Each member of the legislature is part of an institution meant to exercise power equal to that of the presidency. Like all representatives, Murkowski was chosen by the people at home, and directed to vote their conscience and her own, which she has done. In choosing to attack someone this way, Tweety is talking directly to those who elected Murkowski, using the bully pulpit to undermine her.

He is also playing with fire, as there will certainly be someone back home who will now regard Murkowski as “the enemy” who lets the country down. And, since the normal way of doing things is clearly obsolete, that person may not bother waiting for the next election to express his displeasure. What I am saying is that Tweety is recklessly inciting the mob here, and there may be tragic consequences, which of course Tweety will deny responsibility for.

And he’s choosing to attack an ally, a member of his own party, and someone whose support he will certainly need going forward! His idea is to bypass the usual methods of persuasion, like calling her on the phone, or inviting her to lunch, or asking the Majority Leader to give her a message from him, or a million other more civilized options that historical protocol offers. Or simply accepting that she voted her conscience and that this is how our system works. Instead, he has decided that bullying works best. For him.

If Mitch McConnell were actually a leader in any sense of the word, this is where he would draw the line. He would tell Tweety, publicly and sternly, to lay off members of his caucus and to do his own job and let the Senators do theirs. But he is not a leader.

All this comes after days of Tweety similarly attacking his own Attorney General, someone he hand picked for his loyalty and seemingly blind support just months ago. Attacking Jeff Sessions as “weak”, etc., is also unprecedented, not to say nutty, just like so many things Tweety has done. I’m tempted to say “everything” he has done, actually, as I’m having trouble thinking of a single example of Tweety observing presidential protocol or tradition. At least, in this case, the A.G. is someone he appointed, not someone elected by others. But that in no way justifies this method of showing displeasure.

Tweety has had many, many opportunities to talk to Sessions face-to-face about his complaints, as they were both in the same building at the same time on several occasions. But Tweety was holed up in “his private residence”, apparently in a FoxNews-induced trance. He chose to shame and humiliate and antagonize Sessions publicly instead. Sessions, it turns out, isn’t even on Twitter, so not only wasn’t the barrage meant for his ears only, it wasn’t meant for his ears at all. At least not directly.  WTF?

The second example is Tweety “deciding” that transgender people are no longer welcome in the military. He woke up in the morning, “consulted with his generals”, picked up his Twitter, and blasted away.

trans

“Please be advised…? Thank you.” That’s it? That’s all it takes now to disrupt the lives of thousands? That’s all it takes to change policy? No bills passed in congress after a spirited debate? Not even an Executive Order? Just 140 characters randomly blasted out to the world?

“Please be advised…”?

What’s next?

“Please be advised that from today forward, you will drive on the left hand side of the road. Thank you.”

“Please be advised that vegetables will no longer be allowed in grocery stores. Thank you.”

“Please be advised that your existing plumbing systems may no longer be used. If you choose to use water, you may purchase approved brands only. Thank you.”

water

Folks, we’re in uncharted territory here. I don’t know if this form of government has a name yet. Any suggestions?

McCain’s parrot

There have really been only two Republicans in the U.S. Senate that have been openly critical of Tweety to any real extent: Lindsey Graham and John McCain, and their criticism has been generally dismissed as mainly sour grapes from presidential wannabes.

Yesterday, McCain got out of bed, where he had been recovering from recent brain surgery, to come to Washington to cast his crucial vote to open discussion on repealing the A.C.A. He gave a good speech in which he said that Senators should ignore the internet, talk radio, etc., because those people really aren’t concerned with getting anything done for the American people, and that the Senate needs to finally get to work and accomplish some things, because they haven’t been doing their job.

It would have been great if McCain had seized that moment to vote against further discussion of repeal, and made his speech about how it was time to work together with Democrats to fix the problems in the current law.

He didn’t do that for the same reason that no Republican will get off this crazy hobby horse and stop trying to pass something that only 12% of the American people approve of: he would immediately get “Koch”ed in the next primary, i.e. face a hand-picked, well-financed challenger who will rigidly toe the Koch line.

It’s not clear why that would matter to McCain at this juncture, given his health and age, but it’s probably that no one wants their legacy tarnished at the end of their career by a campaign of vitriol, bitterness and accusations against him, which is actually already well under way in McCain’s case. Its spearhead is Kelli Ward.

Kelli Ward was beaten soundly by McCain in the 2016 Republican senate primary in Arizona, and is now running against incumbent Jeff Flake for the other senate seat.

She’s a real piece of work. After McCain was diagnosed with brain cancer and before his surgery, she said that “the medical reality of his diagnosis is grim,” and he should step down and have her take his place. She sounds a lot like Trump when she speaks – lots of bragging, hyperbole, and distortion, as well as liberally quoting “some people”:

“You know, he outspent me nearly 10 to 1. He has a super PAC called Grassroots Action PAC spent over 10 million dollars seeking to destroy my character, my reputation, and my political future.

“However, I have emerged from those ashes much stronger and really I am beating the pants off of Jeff Flake already. You know, some people told me that Jeff Flake would do well to encourage the governor to appoint me because that would take the pressure off of him.”

ward

Note the flag pin. See, that means she loves America. Unlike McCain, who never wore one and therefore does not love America. Earlier this year, she said McCain is too old and will likely die on the job. When McCain got his diagnosis, she ramped it up:

“Senator McCain has an aggressive brain cancer that is both devastating and debilitating. When the time comes that Senator McCain can no longer perform his duties in the Senate at full capacity, he owes it to the people of Arizona to step aside” 

Ward continued, saying that if McCain does leave office, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey would be required to appoint a replacement senator to serve until the 2018 midterm election. When asked if her name was being considered as a replacement, Ward responded: “I certainly hope so.”

“Because, you know, I have a proven track record from years in the state Senate of being extremely effective and of listening to the voice of the people that I represent,” she said.

I don’t really know why, but this ugliness, self-regard, entitlement, and greed reminds me of that scene in “Zorba the Greek” where the bouboulina is sick and being tended to by Zorba. The envious old women of the village get wind that the “foreigner is dying”. They swoop in to her apartment like starving ravens and start grabbing at everything they see – clothes, drapes, jewelry, plates. Everything. And she’s not dead! She’s right there on the bed looking at them.

By the time she does die, there is nothing left of her things. Her lifetime of accumulated mementos and treasures – her legacy – has vanished before her body is cold. Only the parrot survives to give voice to what she was.

zorba

“I cannot tell a lie.”

When I was a little kid, presidents were expected to be role models for our behavior. It seems quaint now, doesn’t it? And we were taught that there were two presidents above all that represented the ideal: George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. They were so far above everyone else, that we actually celebrated the birthday of each, and some states actually had a state holiday for each.

That practice later morphed into one day, President’s Day, and the things that made Abe and George so important started to get lost in the mists. But I still remember clearly what exactly made those two special.

It was honesty.

The first and most important thing we learned about Lincoln was that he was “Honest Abe”. For Washington, it was that he “could not tell a lie”. When he was six he had to confess to the crime of using an ax that he had received as a gift to damage his father’s favorite cherry tree. This inability to tell a lie was what qualified him first and foremost to be president and to set the example that we kids must try to follow.

I’m not sure when we stopped requiring the president to set an example. Maybe J.F.K. was the last – the war hero and dashing young king of Camelot. We now know that Kennedy engaged in a lot of the same behavior that only a few years later led to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

But that’s my point. The people who knew about J.F.K.’s private life bent over backwards to keep it private, and the press went along with it, even though many knew the truth. It was important to preserve the president’s good-guy image, because the youth of the country required it. You couldn’t expect tens of thousands of them to sign up for the Peace Corps, say, on the suggestion of a philanderer on pain meds, but they would go if a dashing young  patriot asked them to.

It goes without saying that no president ever has used a speech at the Boy Scout Jamboree to bad-mouth other presidents or whine about the lack of personal loyalty of those around him, but that is yet another shard that Tweety has managed to slice off the social contract that used to bind all of us together despite our differences. They’re just kids, for God’s sake. I get that we’re past requiring the president to be a role model, but are there really no conventions left that this president should be expected to honor?

But it’s the lying thing I can’t stop thinking about. The new acceptance of the ideas that lying doesn’t really matter, or that everyone does it, or that it’s not actually lying if you believe it, or that we all know what was really meant, etc. etc. is profoundly disturbing.

Words used to matter, but no more. When Tweety said, “On 9/11, I saw thousands of Muslims dancing in the streets of New Jersey”, it was a lie. Or at least it was a “lie” using our previously accepted definition of the word, which was “not true”.

But it was true enough for Tweety and therefore true enough. What you have to understand to appreciate the new standard is to know that in this example, “I” meant “Someone”, that “saw” meant “thought”, that “thousands” meant “some”, that  “dancing in the streets” meant “were not unhappy”, and that “New Jersey” meant “somewhere”.

In other words, if Tweety or one of his family members were to say, “I did not chop that cherry tree down”, we all can understand that he probably did, and should be commended for his honesty in getting out in front of the whole controversy.

In any case, it no longer matters.

lie

 

Collusion is not a crime

Unfortunately. Because if collusion was a crime, the “Russia investigation” would be over. Obviously the Trump campaign “colluded”. They did it proudly and in broad daylight all through the summer of 2016. Remember?

wikileaks.JPG

Maybe you’re thinking, “No, that was just the appearance of collusion. Using ‘oppo’ that originated from Russian hacking is different from seeking it out.” Maybe so, or maybe that’s a distinction without a difference. There was a time, Before Tweety, when just the appearance of misconduct was enough to sink a candidate, but there’s no use pining for an irrelevant past, especially one in which we were only pretending that principles and integrity were real things.

The “smoking gun” of collusion is the meeting that Little Tweety (or as my grandfather might have called him, “Tweetski”, or, perhaps, “Tweeteleh”) took with the Russians. They told him they had some dirt on Hillary, and Tweetski rushed right over to see what goodies they had for him.

His defense of this behavior was that they didn’t have anything too exciting, so nothing came of it, so no big deal, so the Failing New York Times can just shut up about it already. But that misses the point: the meeting itself was the collusion, not what might have been said in it.

But, alas, collusion is not a crime. So what are we actually investigating? It’s all a bit confusing, which in itself is another huge victory for the forces of chaos, and for those who thrive on chaos and benefit from it. But the bottom line is we’re still looking for the fire amidst all the smoke.

The fire might be conspiracy to violate election laws, for example, if the Russians directly provided anything “of value” to Trump. Or it might be a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act if the campaign told the Russians what exactly they needed them to hack. And of course the biggest issue would be lying under oath, for example in registration forms or security documents.

I highly doubt any form of “lying”, under oath or otherwise, could sink Tweety at this point, as everyone knows he lies all the time and no one really cares. The other day I wrote about Scott Adams’ explanations and apologies for Trump’s behavior, and, on the subject of Trump’s constant and outrageous lying, he said that everyone knows what he means and he lies in the “right direction”. The example he gave was Trump’s assertion that on 9/11 he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey dancing in happiness. This never happened, of course, but Adams explained that everyone understood him to mean that many Muslims worldwide thought that 9/11 was some sort of “victory” and were happy about it, and that everybody should be able to agree that this was certainly true.

Lying has thus been redefined and downgraded, and Trump’s use of language is frustratingly imprecise and ambiguous in all cases anyway. So if the Russian investigation “proves” some lies were told along the way, the response from those who matter (Republicans in Congress) will almost certainly be, “So what?” Same as Adams, actually.

But none of that is what I really want to stress today. I’m thinking about the Russian motivation for interfering in the election in the first place. You may not remember that they didn’t actually think Trump was going to win at any point. So what were they doing it for?

Their goal was to undermine confidence in the whole voting process and create controversy that would persist after the election and would diminish the effectiveness of the new president (presumably Hillary Clinton).  They would thereby diminish American standing in the world by showing that the election process was flawed, that at least one of the candidates was indeed “crooked”, and that other models of selecting leaders were no better or worse. In short, there would be much less reason to regard America as a shining example of “Democracy”, and much less reason to regard democracy as a system preferable to any other.

My point for today is that they really needn’t have bothered. For months leading up to the election, Tweety was already loudly proclaiming that the whole thing was rigged and “unfair” and suggesting that it wouldn’t be over after the vote. He was threatening to contest “the peaceful transfer of power” that distinguishes our country from dictatorships, theocracies,  and sometimes even monarchies.

During the final presidential debate, Trump refused to say whether he would accept the election results, and at one point said he would accept them only if he won. Speaking about Trump’s view of the integrity of the elections, President Obama pointed out that “That is dangerous…this is not a joking matter”.

obama-trump.JPG

Trump had his troops so riled up that there was a genuine fear of violence in the streets if Hillary won, and many Hillary supporters actually took a small measure of consolation in Trump’s victory, as this violence was thus averted in the only way it could have been.

Donald J. Trump undermined our electoral process and diminished our standing in the world far more effectively on his own than any army of Russian operatives could have.

Collusion may not be a crime, but for me and millions of others, Trump is certainly a criminal.

Pardon me

It’s official. Everything you thought you knew about how our government works is wrong. Also, politics, international relations, the press, law enforcement, and every other aspect of public life.

There was a time Before Tweety (B.T.) when Republicans took Reagan’s dictum that you never spoke ill of another Republican to be an immutable law. Trump proved that that was not true.

There was a time B.T. when you knew a presidential candidate would have to produce his medical records to prove he was fit and that he wasn’t insane. Trump proved that that was not true.

B.T., it was thought a candidate was required to produce his tax returns to assure the electorate that he was honest, to gauge his charitable giving, and to show if there were any conflicts of interest. Trump proved that that was not true.

B.T., it was thought that, if elected, you had to divest your business interests and put assets in a blind trust to avoid conflicts and to free you to concentrate on the work of the people. Trump proved that that was not true.

B.T., Russia was understood to be a power hostile to our ideals and way of life, and impeding our ability to make it available to others around the world. Trump proved that that was not true.

B.T., the F.B.I., C.I.A., and other intelligence-gathering agencies were thought to be working to help us defend ourselves against all manner of attack and subversion. Trump proved that that was not true.

B.T., it was thought that the role of the press was crucial in shedding light on ambiguous policies and ethical lapses, and that at regular intervals they would be able to ask the questions of those in power that citizens were owed the answers to. Trump proved that that was not true.

B.T., it was thought that the President was not above the law, and that ultimately he must answer to congress and the courts. We thought the resignation of Richard Nixon proved this. Congress had the power to try him for high crimes and misdemeanors, and, when he saw they were going to do just that, he cut his losses as best he could and resigned in disgrace.

Nixon’s successor, Gerald Ford issued a presidential pardon (Proclamation 4311) that granted Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed against the United States while president. It was controversial because many people thought it was a subversion of our system of checks and balances, and because they wanted to see Nixon tried and punished like any other citizen, which they thought they knew to be the way things should be.

But Ford thought it would serve the country better to just move past the ugliness that Nixon had created in the Executive branch, and that civility and public trust would be restored faster by just ending the agony. Maybe he was right.

Even Nixon never thought that he could escape his persecutors by simply pardoning himself. Why resign and wait for his successor to do it? Why not just do it yourself and retain the presidency and skip all the shame? Why not?

Even Nixon could see that it would be an insane abrogation of the power of the presidency and the public trust to attempt such an audacious and dystopian gambit. Even Nixon saw that it made no sense in the context of the American system.

Everyone could see this was obviously true, and for Nixon to pretend it wasn’t would be to affirm the accusations of his most vicious detractors: it would prove he was an insane megalomaniac, a narcissist with no understanding of the principles American government and justice, and no respect for the citizenry.

But Trump has now proved that even this is untrue. He has pronounced that he has the absolute right to pardon aides, family members, and, yes, even himself. And like everything Trump, he may able to justify it all with some sloppy wording in some statute, some missing comma, some failure to include language that no one ever conceived would be needed, some atom of ambiguity that turns everything his way. In this piece, the Failing New York Times asks the question, “Could Trump pardon himself?”, and answers:

This is not clear. The only limitation explicitly stated in the Constitution is a ban on using a pardon to stop an impeachment proceeding in Congress, and the only obvious implicit limitation is that he cannot pardon offenses under state law.

And like everything Trump, having asserted it or tweeted it or even thought it makes it true enough for his followers and for those who feel they benefit somehow by letting this slow-motion dismantling of our social and political institutions continue.

We thought we knew that a president was “only” a president, and not a dictator, a king, an emperor, a pharaoh, or a God. Trump is proving that even that is not true.

trumpgod

 

Healthcare in the good old days

Ron Johnson, Republican Senator from Wisconsin, pointed out the other day that,

“In the ‘40s, 68 cents of every health care dollar was actually paid for by the patient. Today it’s only 11 cents. So nobody cares really what they pay for anything, which is why costs run out of control.”

He was saying that we’ve become a nation of self-entitled sissies that needs to straighten up and take some personal responsibility, because Obamacare is ruining everything. (I’m paraphrasing here. Liberally, if you’ll pardon the pun).

But hearing his argument took me aback a little, until I started to reflect on what a specious, dishonest load of bull it really is. He’s getting his facts from this 46-year-old report, and, yes, they’re basically correct. But it’s not the whole story.

First, let me say that the 1940’s were not the good old days, especially if you weren’t a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant, and no one should be pining for them. But I’ll just confine today’s discussion to health-related things.

We didn’t know much about a lot of things back then, e.g. that if you worked in a watch factory making radium dials, you shouldn’t be painting your nails with the stuff for smiles. This picture is from a book review of, The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America’s Shining Women. The tagline is, “they literally glowed from their work- and then it started killing them.”

radium

Want to lose weight and have more energy? Smoke, smoke, smoke that cigarette!

Little kids played with the liquid mercury they took from old thermometers – so much fun! DDT was sprayed on everything until Rachel Carson started pointing out a few problems with it in the 1950’s.

Kids routinely suffered through all the childhood diseases back then, before immunologists figured out how to prevent them.

“Female troubles”? You’re in luck.

ultrasound

And you just might get polio and live the rest of your life with a serious disability, like President Franklin D. Roosevelt did. Or like Mitch McConnell.

In the 1940’s the life expectancy at birth for a man was 60 years. Now it’s 79.

Health care costs more today because we’ve made a lot of advances, and technology isn’t cheap. Think about all the stuff they can do for you today that didn’t exist back then: C/T scans, laser surgery, organ transplants. The list goes on and on. In those good old days, your GP came to your house if you were sick, and you didn’t have a lot of access to specialists.

The question boils down to whether we care about the health of our citizens as much as every other industrialized and “civilized” country on the planet. Or do we want a country where your health, good or bad, is an opportunity for an insurance or pharmaceutical CEO to pay himself even more obscenely.

To Ron Johnson, I would say: Why stop at the 1940’s if we’re looking for the ideal period in health care history?  Let’s go back to those glorious days of our nation’s beginnings, in the 1790’s. What did the founding fathers think? Back then, you were expected to pay 100% of your own “health care”.  None of this namby-pamby 11% nonsense. Freedom! You were a real American – self-sufficient, proud and strong.

And sick. If you had appendicitis, you were a goner. Toothache? Let me get my pliers out. Off your feed? Got some fresh leeches right here to give you a nice, healthy bleed.

But if we know one thing about Republican Senators, it’s that they practice what they preach. To prove it, the GOML Investigative Reporting Team has been able to acquire an actual photo of the contents of Ron Johnson’s medicine chest, and we now have evidence that he is NOT a hypocrite and he loves the Good Old Days.

snake

One giant leap for mankind

It was 48 years ago today that Neil Armstrong became the first person to set foot on the moon.

moon1

In the following three years, five more successful missions to the moon’s surface were completed (and one, Apollo 13, that didn’t quite get there). By December, 1972, 12 people had walked on the moon. No one has been there in the 45 years since then. No one has even left low earth-orbit.

moon2

The primary reason we undertook the moon-landing adventure was to beat the Soviet Union and assert our dominance in the “space race”. To the lay person all these years later, it doesn’t seem like we got much out of it, though physicists, materials scientists, cosmologists, and others would disagree.

It all seems like it happened a million years ago. In fact, to a lot of people, it seems like it never happened.

This morning, when I googled “Moon landing 1969”, I got 1,620,000 hits. Pretty good. Then I googled “Moon landing hoax” and got 3,730,000 hits. Turns out, the whole thing was probably a big phony government cover-up. Thank God for the internet – I’d be walking around with all the wrong info without it.

Your president is keeping an open mind about it so far. One of his most trusted advisers, Roger Stone, knows that the moon landings were faked.

stone

But Tweety hasn’t taken a firm position, on the record at least. Campaigning in Sacramento a year ago, he seemed on the fence about it:

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said today he believes the moon landing in 1969 was real but “many people” believe the whole thing was orchestrated by the federal government to impress the world and scare the Soviets. “I’m not saying I believe that, but many people have questions about it,” Trump said at a campaign appearance here. “There are people who know about these things who say they saw the interior of a warehouse in Los Angeles converted to look like the surface of the moon, complete with fine dust and craters and the whole thing. Lot of tinfoil lying around. Did NASA hire a Hollywood crew to distract us from Vietnam? I don’t know.”’

To paraphrase Armstrong: One step for a small man.

Tweety vows revenge

tweety
OK, it’s getting a little scarier now.

Your president is bigly honked off about his most recent abject failure, i.e. to deliver on the inane, empty, foolish promise (i.e. “lie”) he blathered on the campaign trail.  “You’re going to have such great healthcare at a tiny fraction of the cost, and it’s going to be so easy”, he confidently told adoring acolytes at an October rally in Florida.  “It begins with immediately repealing and replacing the disaster known as Obamacare”.

Wow.  “Tiny fraction”?   Count me in.  The Dealmaker in Chief will probably pull this off before breakfast on January 21.

By now, I’m sure you’ve all seen Tweety saying that Republicans aren’t going to own this and he’s not going to own it, and we’ll let Obamacare fail and then the Democrats will come to “us” asking how to fix it.

Is there any point in reminding him that he’s president of all of us now?  That the “us” vs. “them” dynamic of the campaign is no longer in effect?  That actively wishing for tens of millions of Americans to lose their health insurance doesn’t make him look “presidential”?  It actually makes him look like a jackass.

According to this FNYT piece, entitled “Trump vows Revenge”, Tweety has the power to do more than just wish for the failure of the A.C.A.  He can actively work towards it by refusing payments to insurers, failing to enforce the individual mandate, and continuing to speak publicly about how he wants the A.C.A. to fail.

Maybe he should take a second to read the fake news.  No, wait.  He’s not going to actually read anything.  Let me try that again: maybe he should take a second to have someone read to him a thought from today’s Washington Post: Why can’t the Senate repeal Obamacare?  Because its policies are actually popular.

But, Tweety prefers the Russian approach, enunciated so well at Stalingrad in the infamous Order 227: Ni shagu nazad.  Not one step back.  It cost them hundreds of thousands of lives there – as any commander who dared make a strategic retreat in order to fight more effectively another day was subjected to a military tribunal (or simply shot).  But, in the end, they prevailed.

Mitch McConnell will now go to Plan C, which we might as well refer to as “Ni shagu nazad”:  to force a vote in the Senate to simply repeal the A.C.A. with no replacement.  It is understood in advance that such a vote will fail, but McConnell wants his troops to be on the record as having voted to repeal or not, so that they will have to explain themselves to a tribunal of their constituents back home, which will be held at the polling place in 2018.

It really wouldn’t be that hard to do for an honest person.  All they’d have to do is say something like, “We Republicans promised you something that we shouldn’t have.  We told you the A.C.A. was a job-killer.  It wasn’t.  We told you there would be “death panels”.  There weren’t.  We told you we had a better idea.  We didn’t.”

We’ll now see how many of them are actually honest.

Or, they could just go home and simply say: “We repealed Obama, but we’re going to keep the care. Win Win”.  That should satisfy the “Lock her up” crowd.

Tweety wants an “accomplishment”

Your president has changed his message so many times on Obamacare, it’s hard to keep it all straight.  He’s veered wildly from asserting he had a “beautiful” health plan ready to go, saying that Obamacare should be replaced with a Republican alternative, saying it should be repealed first and replaced within hours or days, and so on.  But, really, what difference does it  make?  Don’t burn any calories trying to decipher today’s “message”, because it will certainly change by the time you’ve done it.

But, for the record, here’s Tweety’s current wisdom:

repeal

Tweety wants to accomplish something, anything at all, really,  to add to his non-existent list of already-accomplished accomplishments.

The phrasing is kind of odd, though, suggesting “Republicans should…”. Shouldn’t that be “We should…” or “We Republicans”?  I suppose this is what happens when you only give yourself 140 characters to enunciate policy and couldn’t be bothered about working with legislators to understand the details of what you’re offering.

Or maybe it’s just another way to distance yourself from those losing losers who will be blamed for not delivering on the “promise” that swept them all into office.

Remember?  They all promised to take away health insurance from the tens of millions who were able to acquire it after the A.C.A. was passed seven years ago (oh, and cut taxes for rich people who don’t have to worry about coverage).  And all their ecstatic constituents waved their flags and chanted “lock her up” at the prospect.  So much winning.

sick

Problem is, many of those same constituents have started to rub the pixie-dust from their eyes and have woken up to the reality of what’s about to happen, even though Mitch McConnell did his best to ram the whole scam into law without anyone knowing what they were voting for, even his fellow senators.

According to this Failing New York Times piece, entitled Old Truth Trips Up G.O.P. on Health Law: A Benefit Is Hard to Retract , Susan Collins, Republican (in name only) from Maine,

“said she was besieged by constituents who urged her to oppose the Republican plan: a conservative Republican who was worried about the impact on her grandson, who has cystic fibrosis; a small-business owner in a town where the hospital depends on Medicaid for more than 60 percent of its revenues and is the second-largest employer; a working single mother and her 9-year-old daughter who, for the first time in the girl’s life, were both able to get affordable insurance.”

Interestingly, most of the Republican opposition in the Senate is not of the Collins variety, though. Mike Lee of Utah and Jerry Moran of Kansas, are opposing the bill because it’s still too “generous”.  They want not only to repeal Obamacare, but completely gut Medicaid as well.

For the moment, the repeal effort is dead and Tweety will have to accomplish something else instead.  On the plus side, he’s doing very well in the polls. His approval rating dropped to a record low 36%, but he noted that that’s almost 40%!  Not bad!

polls.JPG

Tweety, you’re the best and no one can deny it. Everyone loves you.

Umpires totally get it wrong

I’m having trouble thinking about anything important lately. There’s nothing left to say about Trump and his enablers in Congress that could make any difference or even shed any new light on things.

America is poisonously split in two because of the alternate realities we are experiencing. If you watch FoxNews, you are simply unaware of what a disaster the Trump presidency has been and what a terrible course he’s put us on, and a LOT of people watch FoxNews.

It will only change when Sean Hannity decides it’s time.

If you don’t care about baseball and its anomalies, you can stop reading right here, because that’s all I have for you today.

Last night’s Yankees/Red Sox game at Fenway was a good one. Red Sox ace Chris Sale was brilliant, striking out 13 and allowing only three hits through 7 and 2/3 innings, leaving a 1-0 lead in the usually capable hands of All-Star closer Craig Kimbrel. Kimbrel, who is typically only required to get three people out in the 9th to do his job, was asked here to get the last out of the 8th as well, which he did.

Kimbrel has not blown a single save in Fenway Park since he got there last year, but last night was the night. Matt Holliday, just off the Disabled List, led off the 9th with a game-tying home-run, sending the affair into extras. It was ultimately decided in the 16th, when the Yankees took advantage of the exhausted Sox bullpen, getting a bunch of hits off Doug Fister, a recent acquisition not usually used in relief. The final score was 4-1, Yankees.

But the game is under protest because of a really weird play in the top of the 11th. Matt Holliday (again) was on first when Jacoby Ellsbury hit a sharp grounder to first baseman Mitch Moreland, a clear double-play opportunity. Moreland fielded it cleanly and threw to Bogaerts covering second for the out there, and Bogaerts threw back to first in plenty of time to double up the speedy Ellsbury. But it didn’t work that way.

When the ball was hit, Holliday started toward second, of course, as it was a force play. But when he saw the throw had already been received at second and the out recorded, he headed back to first!  Apart from the silliness of the decision and the ribbing he was sure to take when he got back to the bench, there were bigger consequences. The relay from Bogaerts hit the retreating Holliday in the back and the easy double play was “broken up”

It was a senior moment for Holliday, who has been around a long time and has no excuse for this kind of mental lapse.

But it’s the umpires who are at fault here. They gave Ellsbury first base, despite Holliday’s interference which prevented Moreland from catching the relay that would have completed the double play. Ellsbury should have been called out. They said Holliday didn’t “intend” to interfere, and therefore it wasn’t interference. Huh?

Holliday is out at second. His crazy move of sliding back into first after being called out broke up the double play. Under the Official M.L.B. rule 6.01(a)(5):

(5)  Any batter or runner who has just been put out, or any runner who has just scored, hinders or impedes any following play being made on a runner. Such runner shall be declared out for the interference of his teammate (see Rule 6.01(j)).

It’s petty simple.

So they review the play, causing a five minute delay, and they decide that the ruling would stand! The Red Sox played the rest of the game under protest, probably thinking the Yankees would get a run out of this situation and that would be the game. They didn’t and the game continued.

You’re probably thinking, “if that play didn’t affect the outcome, the protest is silly”. Not so fast. The game was ultimately decided by attrition – the Red Sox ran out of relievers – and, had that double-play stood, there’s a good chance they wouldn’t have had to resort to Fister, at least not as soon as they did. Fewer pitches would have been thrown by the real relievers, thereby allowing them to go deeper into the game.

It’s shaping up to be a tight pennant race, and this game may be well affect the outcome, so there’s potentially something bigger at stake here. Your view of all this probably depends on which team you support, not unlike your view of politics, I suppose. The pro-Yankee media may see it one way while the pro-Red Sox media disagrees.

One thing I’m sure of, though, is that the divide between the Red Sox and Yankees world views, as great as it always has been, is nowhere near as great or as dangerous as the divide caused by the pro-Trump vs. pro-reality media divide.

Marat and The Third Estate

Yesterday was the anniversary of the death in 1793 of Jean-Paul Marat. He was in his bath tub when he died, where he typically worked and sometimes received guests, as he had a bad skin condition and sought relief for it there. He had agreed to an interview with Charlotte Corday, who produced a dagger and stabbed the defenseless Marat to death.

Jacques-Louis David’s depiction of the scene:

marat

Marat had been a doctor and a favorite of French aristocrats, based in part on his success in curing cases of gonorrhea. He published works on eye diseases. In 1777, he was appointed physician to the bodyguard of the comte d’Artois, Louis XVI’s youngest brother, who was to become king Charles X in 1824.

This position gave him the money needed to pursue various scientific studies, and he published works detailing experiments on “The Physics of Fire”, his responses to Newton’s ideas about the nature of light, and research on the nature of electrical force. He reached various conclusions that were accepted by official censors and the Academy of Science,  but  that were disputed by the likes of Lavoisier, e.g. that fire was an “igneous fluid”. Lavoisier demanded that the Academy repudiate the findings, and they ultimately did so, creating a rift between Marat and several important scientists of the day. It also soured Marat on the aristocracy.

Marat gave up science and medicine for politics in 1788, as the French Revolution was at hand. In 1789, he published his “Offering to a Nation”, detailing his thoughts on the Third Estate, i.e. the common people (the First Estate was the clergy, and the Second Estate was the aristocracy).

He had “radical” ideas, arguing that society should provide all its citizens the fundamental needs like food and shelter if they were expected to follow its laws, that the king was simply the “first magistrate” of his people, that the death penalty should be applied the same way for anyone regardless of class, and that every town should establish an advocate for the poor to ensure fair trials.

He started a newspaper called “The People’s Friend”, in which he railed against the various centers of influence in Paris and conservative revolutionary leaders. He was forced into hiding several times during this period and took refuge in the sewers of Paris.

Marat was elected to the National Convention in 1792. He thought that Louis XVI should be executed, but not actually accused of anything until he accepted the constitution of 1791. Marat was arrested and imprisoned in April 1793, on charges that he had called for widespread violence, but was acquitted at trial.

Charlotte Corday, a young woman from Caen, came to his apartment claiming to have information about the whereabouts of Marat’s opponents in Caen, the Girondists. Marat’s wife, Simone, objected to granting her an audience, but he saw her anyway. He talked to her for about fifteen minutes, at which point she pulled a 5″ knife from her clothing and stabbed him. His last words were to Simone,  “Aidez-moi, ma chère amie!”.

Corday was from an aristocratic family who had been impoverished by the Revolution, and was a sympathizer of Marat’s antagonists. She was tried for her crime, and testified that, “I killed one man to save 100,000.”

She was guillotined on July 17th 1793.

corday

Marat was gone, but the ideals he articulated for the Third Estate are as relevant now as they were then.

Yesterday, our president was in Paris on the occasion of Bastille Day. He read a speech which he was apparently seeing for the first time.

In it, he noted that our two nations are forever joined in the spirit of revolution. I would like to think that Tweety understands what the French Revolution was about, and the changes it brought to the dynamic between the Second and Third Estates. However, I’m certain he doesn’t have a clue, and that his ideas more closely resemble Corday’s than Marat’s.

He said that France is America’s first and oldest ally and that “a lot of people don’t know that”. Well, at least one person.

The 7% Solution

Of the 16,000 or so people that have played baseball at the major league level, there have been only 26 players that have managed a career batting average of .333 or better, and four of those ended their playing days before 1900. The others are all in the Hall of Fame, with the exception of Shoeless Joe Jackson and Lefty O’Doul (a pitcher/outfielder who really only had five full seasons).

In other words, if you get a hit once out of every three tries, you are in the elite company of the greatest to ever play the game, better than 99.85% of the rest.

The really weird thing is that to attain this level of greatness, you have to be only 7% better than average, as the aggregate batting average of all the players who ever played is .262.  That’s how hard it is to be “great” hitting a baseball.

But, over the years, the statisticians here at GOML have noticed that there is a shortcut to greatness if you are above average, but not the whole 7% above. What you have to do is get traded to the New York Yankees, where good players are regarded as great, and great players are regarded as Gods, or at least Saints. Expectations are high in New York and so is the pay.

Dave Winfield is a pretty good example of this. He was a very good player in San Diego for eight years, a .284 hitter there with decent power. George Steinbrenner brought him to the Yankees in 1980 and made him the highest paid player in the game. Once in New York, the expectations for him were sky high, but paying a .284 hitter all the money in the world doesn’t make him a .333 hitter. Steinbrenner was disappointed with his new toy right away (even though Winfield actually did hit .290 over nine seasons in New York) and tried all manner of trickery to discredit him to escape the contract. It led to Steinbrenner being  banned from baseball.

The New York effect can work against you as well, particularly if you’re already “great” and perform only at the “great” level but no more. Then you can go from God to goat pretty quickly. Just ask Randy Johnson. The Yankees paid him more than he’d ever made, but he managed only two close-to-great years there. The spotlight was too bright, and the privacy-loving Johnson was at war with the media for two years. Getting the extra attention didn’t really matter to someone who already was headed for the Hall of Fame.

Very good players like, say,  Don Mattingly or Thurman Munson, were accorded super-star treatment in New York, though they were “just” very good.

Which brings me to the subject of Robinson Cano, a very, very good player with New York (hitting .309 over nine years there). Cano never led the league in any category whatsoever, though he made the All- Star team five times and won the Silver Slugger award (best offensive player at his position) four times. But, of course, this was enough for the “God” treatment in New York, and his market value was raised considerably.

Cano became a free agent in 2014 and signed a huge contract with the Seattle Mariners, $24 million a year for 10 years! The most he made in New York was $15 million. Of course, no one is worth this much money, no matter how they were viewed in New York, and Cano has been not quite the player for Seattle that he had been in NY (hitting .296 in his four years there). It’s good but not great, and it’s Seattle not New York, so you have not heard the name Robinson Cano in four years.

cano

I had forgotten completely about him and wasn’t even sure he was still in the game. Until Tuesday night, that is.

Cano was the hero of the All-Star game, hitting a home run in the 10th inning to give the Americans the win. Even though Cano has not been in New York for four years, the Yankees still own the Hyperbole Rights on him, so the headline of the story was:

Ex-Yankee Robinson Cano provides closing act at Aaron Judge’s All-Star party.

For those of you who don’t pay attention to such things, Aaron Judge is the Yankee rookie phenom who won the All-Star Home Run contest, so this was going to be about New York with or without Cano.

Cano’s been a Mariner for four years, but if he does something “great”, he is an “ex-Yankee” first, and a whatever-else second.

I ♥ NY

 

A New Movie Quiz: Nazis

Here are some film images showing Nazis, Nazi mockers, Nazi sympathizers, and Nazi wannabes.

All of these portrayals have stuck with me for one reason or another, although most of the movies they’re in are just so-so or good but not great.  A handful of the twenty movies in the quiz do rise above the rest IMHO, specifically #6, #11, #13, and #19, but that’s the only clue you’re getting.  You’re all too smart and the whole thing’s too easy as it is.

You get one point each for knowing the name of the movie, the name of the actor, and the name of the character in the movie. In one or two cases the character name is not given in the movie credits, or the actor not really “known”, so there’s really no way you can get a perfect score of 60.

If you can get 45 points, you win a one-year membership to “GOML Prime”, which entitles you to unrestricted access to all our great GOML content for one year at absolutely no cost to you, plus free two-day shipping! That’s the best deal on the internet!

Watch the “Comments” section for the answers in a day or two.

1.

n1

2.

n2

3.n3

4.

n4

5.

n5

6.

n6

7.

n7

8.

n8

9.

n9

10.

n10

11.

n11

12.

n12

13.

n13

14.

n14

15.

n15

16.

n16

17.

n17

18.

n18

19.

n19

20.

n20

Baseball’s All-Star Game: a Useless Relic

It’s been a very long time since baseball’s All-Star game was worth watching and looking forward to. In those long-ago days, there was nothing at stake more than bragging rights, but both leagues were serious about winning.

Unless you lived in Chicago or New York in those days, you followed the league your favorite team was in, and never saw the players from the other league in action. You would read about them in the box scores, but that was it.

The All-Star game was your only chance to see the guys from the other league. If you lived in an American League city, the National League was never on TV and you almost never even got a guy in trade from the N.L.  You just never saw them at all. Maybe their league and their players really were better than yours. The only way to find out was at the All-Star game.

Imagine a team like the one the National League fielded in 1960. A few of the guys they ran out for that one: Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Roberto Clemente, Stan Musial, Ernie Banks, and Eddie Mathews.  All on the same team! Almost all in their prime (Musial was 39 at that point). There wasn’t even enough room on their roster that year for the likes of Frank Robinson!

It was a team of supermen. How could anyone beat them? The Americans that year were mostly Yankees: Mantle, Maris, Berra, Elston Howard, Whitey Ford, and Bill Skowron, plus the 41-year old Ted Williams, then in his final year (he still managed a .316/.451/.645 season, though!). They actually played two All-Star games that year, one in Kansas City and one on New York, and the Nationals did win them both. But it was a show well worth watching.

That was a long, long time ago. These days, no one really cares about who wins the All-Star game – it’s just an exhibition and nothing more. There are a lot of reasons why, not the least of which is that baseball itself is so boring now. But there are structural and other changes that make the whole thing too silly to bother with now. Here are a bunch of reasons, but I think they’re all symptoms of the same disease, namely too much money sloshing around the sport and too much greed for even more.

Inter-league play is the main reason the game is no longer interesting. I see the guys from the other league all the time, now. I’d actually like to see them less.  The whole idea that it’s a chance to see something I couldn’t otherwise see is lost.

Free Agency has a similar effect.  These days, players move from league to league all the time. No one thinks of himself as a “National Leaguer” any more. The whole concept of “Us” vs. “Them” is lost.

Cable TV – I can see every game of every team all year long if I want. I don’t have to wait for the All-Star game to have a look at some new phenom in the other league. There’s no mystery about what’s happening out of your view, as everything is always in your view.

Fan voting is stupid. The way the teams are selected is meant to promote interest in the game, not produce a side with the best chance to win.

Every franchise has to be represented on the team, even if it means denying a better player a spot. Again, this is supposed to raise fan interest, as you eagerly await the turn of “Your” guy to see what he’ll do.

And this means everyone has to play, whether the situation calls for it or not. Pitchers pitch one inning at most now, and the starting position players are all on the bench by the fourth inning.

Your best squad is not out there when it matters (and even when it doesn’t)  – especially if the game goes into extra innings. The 2002 All-Star game was controversially called a 7-7 draw, when both teams were out of pitchers to use. No player was awarded the game’s MVP. That should tell you all you need to know.

At that point, everyone realized how stupid the whole thing had become, and tried to revive the “meaningfulness” of it all by giving home field advantage in the World Series to the winning side. That idea was dropped this year because everyone understood that, unless you went back to a more serious team-selection and managing format, it was unacceptably random.

The players don’t care about the All Star game any more. The best players, particularly those who have already gone to an All-Star game before, would prefer just to have a three-day break with their family than participate in this charade, possibly risking injury and reducing their future earning power for no real reason. Derek Jeter famously skipped in in 2011 and Mike Trout this year just to name a couple of many examples.

They’ve tried to spice up the whole spectacle with bogus competitions like “Home-run Derby”. Yawn

If you think it hasn’t changed over the years, have a look at this play that ended the 1970 All-Star game in the 12th inning, featuring a guy who wanted to win more than anything – even an All-Star game. Could this ever happen today?

 

Strats and Strads

Remember this scene in Antonioni’s “Blow Up”? It’s one of my favorites of all time. David Hemmings wanders into a performance space where a band is playing to a somewhat dazed looking small audience. One of the players is having trouble with an amp, and, well, see what happens next…

It’s such a great scene for a lot of reasons, one being that the band is actually the  Jimmy Page/Jeff Beck Yardbirds, one of the most iconic and influential in the history of Rock and Roll, with Beck smashing his axe in the scene.

But it’s the “treasure to trash” ending of the scene I really like. In the context of the show, the busted up guitar is treasure worth fighting for, but a minute later, out on the street, it’s just junk. It has no intrinsic value, just the perceived value of the people watching the show.

When you think of the value that certain violins have to collectors, e.g. those made by Amati or Stradivari, you can see something different. They are valued for their craftsmanship (the techniques and skill of the maker can’t be replicated), their rarity (no more will be produced), their provenance (who has owned and played them), and, most of all, their sound. Those violins are meant to be played. Of course, most of the great players can’t afford the instruments, but the people who can afford them will often purchase them with the objective of having them played by an expert. Yes, they have great value as museum pieces, but they also have intrinsic value to the musician.

Of course, there are some violins that are valued entirely for their provenance, irrespective of their quality. For, example, the violin on which “Nearer My God To Thee” was played as the Titanic went down. According to this site, it was discovered in an attic in England, had its history verified, and was last sold for $1.7 Million.

titanic

But the most expensive violins are valued for their sound as much as their history. Here are a couple of examples from the same site (click to enlarge):

To be sure, there are famous luthiers and manufacturers whose products are also valued for their sound and playing characteristics, and some of their guitars are quite expensive.

But the most expensive guitars are simply the most famous ones, i.e. owned and played by the most famous musicians. They are typically made by companies still in business today: Martin, Gibson, and Fender, and, although often customized for the particular player, could easily be reproduced to the original standard. They are not meant to be played or even touched, but rather admired and either re-sold for a profit or given to a museum.

The Fender Stratocaster on which Jimi Hendrix played The Star Spangled Banner at Woodstock was purchased by Microsoft founder Paul Allen for $2 Million. If he plays it, he doesn’t do it in public, at least to my knowledge.

jimi

Will this particular instrument increase in value over the centuries? Only if Jimi’s fame and the Woodstock moment endure. I’m not saying they won’t, but anyone who wants a guitar of identical sound and build quality, could have one made today for a lot less than $2M.

The highest price ever paid for a guitar does not yet match the highest price ever paid for a violin, but the gap is closing. The Reach Out To Asia strat sold for $2.7 Million, not because it’s a great instrument, but because a lot of legendary players signed it for a charity auction, held for relief for the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami victims. (Click on the link to find out who).

tsunami

An electric Washburn owned but rarely played by Bob Marley, was given away to his tech, Gary Carlsen, and ultimately sold for $1.2 Million. It is now enshrined in Jamaica as a “National Treasure”.

marley

Bringing it all back around to the Yardbirds, this 1964 Gibson ES-335 was used by Eric Clapton in his time with the band (before Page and Beck), as well as with Cream, Blind Faith, and John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers.

clapton

It sold at auction at Christie’s in 2004 for $847,500, at the time the third highest price ever paid for a guitar. A nice axe, to be sure, but who knows what David Hemmings and Michelangelo Antonioni would do with it.

“Do you know who I am?”

The Judiciary Committee here at GOML headquarters has proposed new sentencing guidelines for anyone who uses the phrase, “Do you know who I am?” in the commission of a crime. All prison time should be doubled with no possibility of consideration for good behavior. Clearly, the “good behavior” ship has sailed and it isn’t coming back.

The answer to the question, “Do you know who I am?” is virtually always, “No ones gives a rat’s ass who you are, and be careful  suggesting you deserve special treatment, because you just might get it.”

A couple of days ago, a 23-year-old punk named Joseph Daniel Hudek IV assaulted a flight attendant and a couple of passengers while trying to open the emergency door of a plane an hour out of  Seattle heading to Beijing. Maybe he was trying to kill himself (and others). Maybe he was having a psychotic break. Maybe he’s a tweaker who had too much. Don’t know, don’t care. During the mêlée, he shouted “Do you know who I am?”, thus automatically disqualifying him from any sympathetic consideration of his actions.

hudek

Saying these words immediately establishes his guilt, irrespective of mitigating circumstances, such as mental illness. Saying these words is worse than fat-shaming, which, as the internet tells us,  is worse than just about anything else.

First of all, he’s nobody. But that really isn’t the point. He thinks he’s somebody, possibly Napoleon, or perhaps a super-hero who can fly without the assistance of an airplane. Or he thinks his mother is somebody, and therefore he is somebody. He was flying in First Class as a non-rev on a “dependent pass”, and apparently the mother works for Delta in some capacity. Also irrelevant.

After smashing a wine bottle over his head to no effect, the crew enlisted the help of some passengers who finally were able to get Joey into some comfy zip-ties. Here’s what the galley looked like at that point:

galley

In this country, even if you are “somebody”, you’re nobody. If the people you’re beefing with haven’t already taken your identity into consideration, trying to convince them of your “status” in the middle of a set-to only makes things worse.

Remember the “Nut Rage” incident a couple of years ago?  It was another “Do you know who I am?” incident. Cho Hyun-ah, at the time an executive of Korean Air and the daughter of its CEO, had a big jet turned around on the runway in New York and returned to the gate, inconveniencing hundreds of other passengers. The problem? Her macadamia nuts had been served in a bag, not on a plate.

From the link:

She has denied physically assaulting the chief steward, Park Chang-jin, who says she made him kneel and beg for forgiveness before jabbing him with a document folder.

She then ordered the plane to go back to the terminal at New York’s JFK airport to offload the attendant, who was fired on the spot before the plane proceeded on its journey. He has since been reinstated.

Her father, Korean Air chairman Cho Yang-Ho, has apologised for his daughter’s “foolish act”. Mr Cho also said his daughter would step down from all her posts in companies under the Cho family-owned Hanjin Group, which also owns Korean Air.

This is just the beginning of what should happen to this special snowflake, but it didn’t work out that way. She was sentenced to 10 months in prison, as the international outrage she sparked demanded, but the court suspended the sentence, so if she doesn’t turn any other jets around for two years, she won’t have to go to prison at all.

From this piece about the incident:

The episode cannot be explained “except by the fact that Vice President Cho Hyun-ah was a member of the chairman’s family,” said the civic group People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy. It said the case exemplified how the personal wishes of a member of the family that owns a leading South Korean conglomerate often override official regulations and common sense.

“No pilot is going to oppose an order from the daughter of the company owner,” said Lee Gae-ho, a lawmaker affiliated with the New Politics Alliance for Democracy, the main opposition party.

Fortunately, in the United States, being the daughter of the boss doesn’t give you the right to make policy that affects people’s lives.  Everyone knows we have nepotism laws that ensure we operate as a meritocracy.

I haven’t yet read this article,  which is entitled “Ivanka Trump takes father’s seat at G-20 leaders’ table in break from diplomatic protocol”, but I’m sure we have nothing to worry about.

Ivanka in charge

Fox and Chicken conclude secret talks

A meeting of the Fox and the Chicken took place yesterday in Hamburg, resulting in a historic agreement being reached on the future protection of the Henhouse.

fox

The meeting was unprecedented in that there were only four attendees, no notes were kept, and no media was present to record what was said. Only the Chicken has reported on the outcome so far, characterizing the meeting as “tremendous”, saying it had been an honor to meet with the Fox, and boasting that he made the Fox swear that he had never and would never enter the Henhouse for any reason.

coop

Talk radio stations and other “conservative” media heralded the event, noting that the Chicken was an extremely experienced negotiator who had a long history of always getting better “deals” than anyone else, and pointing out that the Fox had been a much more dependable ally of Chickens in general, and of the Henhouse in particular, than any “liberal” had ever been.

In return for assurances of the future security of the Henhouse, the Chicken agreed that all eggs produced therein would be licensed in perpetuity to the Fox.

The Fox has been an admirer of the Chicken for years, affectionately referring to him as “Tweety”, and has been quoted as saying the Chicken was the most handsome, talented, intelligent, and skilled partner he has ever had.

pootie

 

 

 

Fred Noonan

It was 80 years ago yesterday that Fred Noonan went missing at age 44. He was declared dead a year later, though his body was never found.

Noonan

His mother had died when he was four and relatives in the Chicago area took him in. He took off for Seattle at age twelve where he became a seaman. He worked on many ships and rose to the rank of bosun’s mate. In the Merchant Marine during World War I, he was on ships that were sunk by German U-boats three different times.

As a sailor, he traveled around Cape Horn seven times, three times under sail. After 22 years at sea, he learned to fly airplanes and ultimately went to work for Pan Am as a navigator. He was the navigator on the first Sikorsky S-42 Flying Boat out of San Francisco in 1935.

sikorsky

And also on the historic mail flight across the Pacific of the China Clipper a month later.

clipper

Noonan mapped Pan Am’s pioneering routes across the Pacific, always carrying a ship’s sextant with him to navigate by the stars.

In 1937, he resigned from Pan Am, having gone as far as he could in the company as a navigator. He hoped to open a navigation school, and he signed on for a “record-breaking” around-the-world flight that he thought would bring him the needed fame to get a good start. The plane to be used was a very highly advanced one for the day,  the Lockheed Model 10 Electra.

electra

When he disappeared, he had navigated 22,000 of the planned 35,000 kilometers of the flight. On July 2 1937, he took off from Lae, New Guinea and headed for Howland Island, a tiny speck less than half a mile long in the middle of the Pacific.

howland

There was a second person on the plane, but it was up to Noonan to find the way. They reached the vicinity of Howland and established radio contact, but they never saw the island itself, and were never heard from or seen again. Some research later showed that the island was wrongly located on their charts – off by about five miles.

Many books have been written about the disappearance. Movies have been made, songs written, conspiracy theories advanced. Tons of websites, literally millions, speculate on exactly what happened. Many people have latched on to an apparently bogus claim that Noonan may have been drunk, though the most accepted theory is that they simply ran out of gas and ditched. In recent years, there have been claims that their remains had been found on a nearby island.

By now, you’re probably wondering why, if so much attention has been given to this, do you not know who Fred Noonan is and have never heard his name before. Well, I guess I buried the lede – the other person on board was Amelia Earhart.

Noonan hoped to capitalize on the attention that Amelia Earhart’s “exploits” garnered. Her husband and business partner, publisher George Putnam, promoted the flight as if she was flying solo, careful to keep Noonan out of the publicity as much as he could. He micro-managed the whole stunt, actually, causing Earhart’s original choice for navigator, Harry Manning, to quit after a bungled first attempt when Earhart crashed on takeoff in Hawaii. 

For those who study these things, Noonan has received virtually all of the blame for the screw-up, though it’s clear he would have received very little acclaim had he succeeded.

A beautiful song called “Amelia Earhart’s Last Flight” was written by Red River Dave McEnery, and it became the first song ever performed on commercial television at the 1939 World’s Fair.  The song got Noonan’s name wrong  in the original version, published in “Sing Out” magazine, giving it as “Captain Newman”, though I believe they got the “Captain” right.

newman

Even today some web sites are confused about his name,  though in most versions you’ll find on the web today, this mistake has been corrected.

I like this version by Kinky Friedman and the Texas Jewboys, though, as always, Kinky plays it for smiles.

As the song says, Happy landings, Captain Noonan.

Fraudulent voter fraud fraud

Tweetin’ Donny has a big investigation going to finally “prove” that he won the popular vote, which he lost by about 3 million. See, 3-5 million votes were cast by illegals, all for Hillary Clinton, and that’s a scandal.

We’ve got something called “The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity” looking into it. It’s headed by “a divisive conservative voting rights expert”, Hans von Spakovsky, who no one seems to know much about as no biographical information was included with his appointment announcement. We do know he’s a believer in Trump’s fantasies though. From the link:

For more than a decade, von Spakovsky has been a polarizing figure in voting rights circles, with conservatives championing his efforts to tighten regulations and shore up voter roll inconsistencies. His critics point to a career in which decisions have led to disenfranchisement among poor and minority groups.

“I think there are number of people who have been active in promoting false and exaggerated claims of voter fraud and using that as a pretext to argue for stricter voting and registration rules,” said Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California at Irvine. “And von Spakovsky’s at the top of the list.”

After von Spakovsky’s appointment was announced, Hasen wrote on his blog that it was “a big middle finger” from Trump to people “serious about fixing problems with our elections.”

Spakovsky

This week, the commission kicked off its big show with a letter sent to the 50 Secretaries of State around the country asking for names, addresses, birth dates and party affiliations of registered voters in each state. It also sought felony convictions, military statuses, the last four digits of Social Security numbers and voting records dating back to 2006.

From this Politico piece,

Many states immediately raised concerns and voiced their opposition to providing the information. 

Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes (D) said that she does not intend to release the data. 

“The president created his election commission based on the false notion that ‘voter fraud’ is a widespread issue — it is not,” Lundergan Grimes said. “I do not intend to release Kentuckians’ sensitive personal data to the federal government.” 

Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann, a Republican, similarly said he won’t turn over any information to the panel, telling members of the voter fraud commission to, “go jump in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, took a similar line.

All three of these states went to Trump in the election, but, at least so far, their leadership recognizes a preposterous breach of ethics and precedent when they see one.

Nonetheless, the prognosticators here at GOML are now going on record as predicting that this investigation will absolutely yield “evidence” that will 100% vindicate Tweetin’ Donny, and that will make an important contribution to his project of totally devaluing facts and creating “truth” as needed.

And the long-term fallout of this effort will be more restrictive voting laws that favor one particular party and I think we all know which one.

HAPPY

 

 

The Judensau, 500 years after Luther

On October 31st, we will mark the 500th anniversary of the posting of Martin Luther’s “95 Theses”,  a list of questions and propositions for debate which he nailed to the door of the Wittenberg Castle church. It sparked the Protestant Reformation by arguing against the corrupt practice of selling “indulgences” to absolve sin. He argued that salvation could only be achieved through faith, not deeds.

At first, Luther was willing to welcome Jews into his congregation, reasoning that with the corrupt practices of Catholicism removed, they would have little reason not to accept Christ. He wrote in 1523 that Catholics had treated Jews “like dogs”, making it difficult for them to convert. He said,

“I would request and advise that one deal gently with them …If we really want to help them, we must be guided in our dealings with them not by papal law but by the law of Christian love. We must receive them cordially, and permit them to trade and work with us, hear our Christian teaching, and witness our Christian life. If some of them should prove stiff-necked, what of it? After all, we ourselves are not all good Christians either.”

But when few Jews proved willing to abandon their view that a man could not be God, Luther gave up on them and had plenty to say against them in his famous book, “On the Jews and Their Lies. “

In the treatise, he argues that Jewish synagogues and schools be set on fire, their prayer books destroyed, rabbis forbidden to preach, homes burned, and property and money confiscated. They should be shown no mercy or kindness, afforded no legal protection, and “these poisonous envenomed worms” should be drafted into forced labor or expelled for all time. He also seems to advocate their murder, writing “[W]e are at fault in not slaying them”.

The Wittenberg Castle church had been a Catholic church before Luther, and has remained a Lutheran church through today. Like many Catholic churches across Germany, it had a Judensau, a Jew-Pig, carved on its facade in 1305.

wittenberg judensau

sau

The Judensau iconography taunts and vilifies Jews. It’s often located on the outside of the building where all can see it, but it can also be present inside on choir chairs, on wall paintings, woodcuts, and so on.

The Wittenberg Judensau includes a nonsense inscription, “Rabini Shem hamphoras,” which seems to be a version of “shem ha-meforasch”, the full-form name of God regarded by Jews as too holy to be spoken.

Luther talks about the sculpture in his 1543 Vom Schem Hamphoras, in which he equates the Jews with the devil, and indicates their Talmud is located in the sow’s bowels:

“Here on our church in Wittenberg a sow is sculpted in stone. Young pigs and Jews lie suckling under her. Behind the sow a rabbi is bent over the sow, lifting up her right leg, holding her tail high and looking intensely under her tail and into her Talmud, as though he were reading something acute or extraordinary, which is certainly where they get their Shemhamphoras.”

Last year, an online petition was started to finally take the Wittenberg Judensau down.  The thinking is that 700 years of this kind of thing is enough, particularly given modern regional history which is very much present in the memories of many still alive.  But the petition has only got about 7500 or so signatures so far.

If the people of South Carolina can finally be persuaded to lower their confederate flags, maybe some of those open-minded, progressive Germans we keep hearing so much about could think about taking a similar baby-step here.

If you ever get the urge to see some other Judensau examples still in place today, here’s where you can find them:

judensau map

And here are some pictures showing some variations on the theme:

The World Hates Us

We’re only five months into Trump’s Make America Great Again project and the damage is enormous. It’s far greater than just what has resulted already from Trump’s attacks on our environment, our educational system, our health care system, our judicial system, our security services, our legislative processes, our independent media, and a wide range of individual citizens who have been reproached, vilified, and ridiculed.

It’s our place in the world that has suffered most.

pariah

Our allies don’t trust us. Our treaty commitments are up for “re-negotiation”. The “soft power” we have exercised worldwide through the example of our institutions, political culture, educational opportunities, and our economic and philanthropic outreach is diminished.

This WaPo piece describes the precipitous decline of our status in Western Europe and our tremendous surge of esteem in Russia. It offers some explanations, including,

What is surprising, said Frank G. Wisner, a former diplomat who served under Democrats and Republicans, is the degree to which Trump has scorned principles the United States has not only long espoused but also helped to define in the previous century. These include democratic governance, free markets, collective security, human rights and the rule of law — commitments that together, Wisner said, delineate the liberal international order.

This Pew Research Center piece describes a poll of 37 nations, summing it up by saying, “Trump and many of his key policies are broadly unpopular around the globe, and ratings for the U.S. have declined steeply in many nations.”

There is a  ton of information and detail in the Pew study – well worth a look. Here are a couple of highlights:

confidence

favorability

ratings

The image, esteem, and power of the U.S. has been enormously diminished in just a few months, but it’s Trump himself that takes the biggest hit:

A median 22 percent are confident that Trump will do the right thing in global affairs, down from 64 percent who had confidence in Obama.

The Failing New York Times rated Trump’s first 100 days as the “Worst On Record”, but that’s the sort of fake news that explains why they’re failing.

Trump’s view of his own success is, of course, entirely different. In that “cabinet meeting” he held recently, where the agenda consisted of each cabinet member in turn describing how unbelievably great Trump is, he said,

“There has never been a president, with few exceptions, who has passed more legislation, done more things.”

Way to go, man-baby. And thanks for nothing.

cabinet

Trump now more popular than Obama!

It’s the weekend and Trump just woke up. You know what that means, kids – right? It’s crazy-tweet time!

So at about 7:00 A.M. today, the man-baby started tweeting about accomplishing all those fantastic accomplishments he’s already accomplished – more than anyone else ever has. It’s historic! And it’s all happened “despite the distraction of the witch hunt.”

And, best of all, his popularity is now higher than Obama’s!

trump tweet

Except, of course, that it isn’t true.   After the same amount of time as President, on June 18th 2009, President Obama had an average approval rating of 59.8. This is 9.8% higher than Trump’s Rasmussen approval, and 19.8% higher than Trump’s overall average approval rating this week.

But the story here isn’t Trump’s crazy-tweets or his tenuous connection to the world of facts, much less “truth”. No one takes seriously anything the President of the United States says or tweets anymore. Everyone has already accepted that and moved on.

The real story here is that our President is obsessed with his poll numbers, and with Barack Obama, to the point where doing the actual work of governing has been pushed aside. There’s just no time for it. Making up stuff to brag about and watching TV to see how you’re doing is a full-time job.

Pete Rose is out

The National Baseball Hall of Fame is an independently operated museum of baseball history, meaning it has no direct connection to Major League Baseball. They can do what they want with their museum, irrespective of what M.L.B. says or thinks.

This week, the H.O.F. announced that Pete Rose would never be enshrined there. They affirmed a rule they’ve had which says anyone banned by M.L.B. could not be in the Hall.

As everyone knows, M.L.B. has banned Pete Rose for life for the sin of betting on baseball when employed as a manager for the Cincinnati Reds. Rose can’t work in professional baseball again. This is appropriate. Ever since the Black Sox scandal of 1919, everyone has known that the one thing you could never do was bet on the sport while you were part of it. Rose did it anyway.

The Hall of Fame is a different story. Keeping Rose out is not appropriate. It’s not the Hall of Ethics. It’s not the Hall of Good Guys.

Pete Rose would otherwise be a first ballot Hall-of-Famer, just based on the one fact that he had 4256 hits in his career, more than anyone else who ever played the game. Only the immortal (and immoral) Ty Cobb ever got to 4000 and no one else ever came close. And Rose, known appropriately as Charlie Hustle, had many many other accomplishments that also qualify him, every one of which confirms what anyone who ever saw him play already knows: Pete Rose always tried as hard as he could to do his best to win. Always.

The Hall of Fame is now committed to having a baseball museum in which, among many other omissions,

the all-time hits leader (Rose) is not enshrined,

the all-time Home Run and Walks leader and seven-time M.V.P. (Barry Bonds) is absent,

a guy who won the Cy Young award as the best pitcher in the league seven times (Roger Clemens) is out,

one of only seven people to have both 3000 hits and 500 home runs (Rafael Palmeiro) is missing,

another (Alex Rodriguez), who had an even better career than Palmeiro, will have to be kept out by the same logic when he reaches eligibility,

the left-handed hitter with the best lifetime average after Cobb (Joe Jackson) is out.

There are a million ways they could enshrine these guys and others while acknowledging their shortcomings. But they’re too high-minded for that.

It’s just stupid.

 

Zeno’s bridge

Remember Zeno’s Paradox? Achilles gives a tortoise a head-start in a foot race, but can never overtake it. By the time Achilles has run to where the tortoise started, the tortoise has moved ahead a bit, and by the time Achilles covers that bit, the tortoise has moved further. And so on, ad infinitum.

Well, if you ever want to get a big infrastructure contract in Boston, like fixing the decaying Longfellow Bridge, you’d do well to keep Zeno in mind when you prepare your sales pitch.

Check out this super-slick animated presentation about the Longfellow Bridge rehabilitation project now underway in Boston. It’s a really cool look at how the engineers will accomplish it and every detail is covered in their plan, which they created at the time the project went out for bid.

After watching this thing, you will be 100% confident they know what they’re doing and have taken all eventualities into account. There can be no doubt they’ll complete the work on time and maybe even under budget.

Wrong again, suckers!

The project was begun in 2013 and was going to be completed in mid-2016. But guess what? When they started the repairs, they found out there were some problems that they hadn’t figured on. “Like what?”, you may ask, “that animation they did had everything covered”. Well, see, it turned out some elements of the steel supports were rusty!

rust

Now, I’m no engineer and I certainly have no experience making animated sales pitches, so naturally my first thought on hearing about the rust was, “No shit! That’s why we needed to fix the bridge in the first place.  Remember?”

Anyway, when the first deadline of three years passed, the engineers said, yeah, well, we’ll be done in a couple or three more years, maybe in late 2018. When they said that, they may have really believed they could do it (or not), and, anyway, it was so  far into the future that no one would remember when the time came.

Well, we’re six months away from 2018, so they better move fast. When I look at the bridge today, it seems about half done. They’ve got the Red Line tracks moved over to one side and the entire roadway on the other side is removed. I took this picture the other day.

update

In my lay opinion, and given the way things always work around here, there’s no way this project can be completed in 2018. Around September of next year, you can expect them to say, “We’re almost there. Only about 12 months left. Sorry for any inconvenience.”

To which Zeno will reply, “No worries, Achilles, you’ll probably pass that tortoise any day now”.

What’s the purpose of hearings?

Have you figured it out yet? I’ll give you a hint: it’s not to get answers to your questions.

Appearing before the Senate Intelligence committee last week, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and NSA Director Adm. Mike Rogers repeatedly said they would not discuss their private conversations with Donald Trump.

They said they didn’t feel that the public setting of the hearings was an appropriate venue. Democrats were stunned by this. They went back and forth about it, with the senators pointing out there was no basis on which they can legitimately refuse to answer, that Executive Privilege was not being invoked, demanding what the legal justification for refusing to answer is, etc. etc. etc. yadda yadda yadda.

But the bottom line is that if you’re called to answer questions before a congressional committee, and you don’t feel like answering, well, then don’t. No consequences for you. No charges of “Contempt of Congress”. Nothing.

Same thing yesterday when Attorney General Jeff Sessions appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee. He just didn’t feel like answering, so he didn’t. No, he didn’t claim “Executive Privilege” or any other real reason,  only that,

 “It’s longstanding policy in the Department of Justice not to comment on conversations that the attorney general has had with the president of the United States for confidential reasons that really are founded in the co-equal branch powers of the Constitution of the United States.”

Chuck Schumer, a member of the committee  from  New York said,

“Unfortunately, the Attorney General repeatedly refused to answer pertinent questions from members of the Senate Intelligence Committee without offering a scintilla of a legal justification for doing so.

This is part of a repeated and troubling pattern from Trump administration officials who clam up and refuse to answer questions about the Russia investigation, even though cabinet officials have had no qualms talking about their conversations with the President.” 

That’s it. That’s all they have for you.  Hope it makes you feel better.

So what’s the purpose of such hearings? Well, it’s grandstanding, of course. It’s a chance for an otherwise powerless and locked-in-partisan Senator or Congressman to show the people back home what a gallant, incorruptible standard-bearer he or she really is, hopefully gaining some support at the ballot box in the process.

gowdy

The other day, I said Trey Gowdy, the U. S. Rep. from South Carolina’s fourth district, seemed more like a demented piranha then a lawmaker to me. To see some support for both that observation as well as today’s point about the purpose of hearings, and also to make yourself sick, check out his “questioning” of M.I.T. Professor of Economics, Jonathan Gruber. You’re welcome.

Rubber-necking the Trump-train

Everyone knows that Trump is a “ratings machine”, and he is very proud of that. Whatever show he appears on gets great ratings, and whatever event he attends becomes the center of news coverage, obscuring any other that might be happening at the same time, even a Presidential Primary debate.

It’s always struck me that he is discounting the “rubber-necking” effect. Have you ever been in a traffic jam on an Interstate, wondering what’s going on and speculating that there must an accident up ahead, only to find out that there was indeed an accident, but on the other side of the road that shouldn’t have impacted you at all? Everyone on your side slowed down to gawk. or rubber-neck, as they drove by, creating an annoying delay.

Well, I often tune in to see Trump as well, just to see what kind of accident he’ll cause, or to get my adrenaline going if I’m feeling lethargic. I’m contributing to his great ratings, but not in the way he thinks.  I’m just rubber-necking.

This Quinnipiac Poll, done on May 10, has a lot of interesting information about the man-baby’s approval ratings, for example:

  • 61 – 33 percent that he is not honest, compared to 58 – 37 percent April 19;
  • 56 – 41 percent that he does not have good leadership skills, little change;
  • 59 – 38 percent that he does not care about average Americans, compared to 57 – 42 percent April 19;
  • 66 – 29 percent that he is not level-headed, compared to 63 – 33 percent last month;
  • 62 – 35 percent that he is a strong person, little change;
  • 56 – 41 percent that he is intelligent, compared to 58 – 38 percent;
  • 64 – 32 percent that he does not share their values, compared to 61 – 35 percent.

From the text:

“There is no way to spin or sugarcoat these sagging numbers,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.

“The erosion of white men, white voters without college degrees and independent voters, the declaration by voters that President Donald Trump’s first 100 days were mainly a failure and deepening concerns about Trump’s honesty, intelligence and level headedness are red flags that the administration simply can’t brush away,” Malloy added.

approval

But of all the information in the poll, my favorite is the answers to the question, “What’s the first word that comes to mind when you think of Donald Trump?”

Before you check the result below, let’s play a quick game of “Family Feud”. Think about how you would respond to this question. How does your guess compare to the most popular ones in the survey?

poll1

What was it about?

In early 1963, most Americans could not find Viet Nam on a map of the world.  I’m pretty certain Donald J. Trump couldn’t do it on his first try even today.

southeast asia

The first time the words “Viet Nam” penetrated the consciousness of the average person here was in May, 1963 when Life Magazine published this picture of a Buddhist Monk named Quang Duc burning himself to death:

monk1

The government of President Ngo Dinh Diem, a Catholic, had been brutally repressing the country’s Buddhist majority, despite protests and pleas from the U.S. to liberalize their policy.  Quang Duc burned himself to protest the bad treatment, and other monks did the same shortly thereafter. Madame Nhu, the president’s sister-in-law, referred to the burnings as “barbecues” and offered to supply matches.

Diem and his brother were assassinated in a military coup in November, 1963. But these events are really secondary to U.S. involvement in the region.

Viet Nam had been part of  colonial “French Indochina” before World War II, after which increased nationalist feelings and a desire to escape colonialist rule led to the First Indochina War.  seen from the Vietnamese point of view as a war of independence

This ultimately resulted in the partition of the country in 1954, with the North being supported by China, which only five years earlier had its own revolution, which had resulted in communist rule of mainland China. It was the Chinese influence that got the interest of the U.S., which at that moment was beginning to base virtually all foreign policy on the need to resist the communist “aggression” worldwide. This policy led us into supporting every nutty military dictator we could find around the globe, as long as he was “anti-communist”, while ignoring the legitimate aspirations and rights of local populations. We are still feeling the blow-back from that policy today.  That, among other things, is why Iran hates us, for example.

President Kennedy was firmly committed to the Cold War policy of pushing back communists, but at first thought the Vietnamese army had to do it. He said,

“to introduce U.S. forces in large numbers there today, while it might have an initially favorable military impact, would almost certainly lead to adverse political and, in the long run, adverse military consequences.”

But after the failure at the Bay of Pigs, the development and success of the Russian space program, and the construction of the Berlin Wall, he figured the credibility of our military might was at stake.  Into the quagmire we went.

Our involvement is sometimes known as the Second Indochina War, or, to the Vietnamese, the Resistance War Against America. There had been only 900 American advisers in Vietnam when Kennedy took office, none serving in a combat role. But by November 1963, when he was assassinated, there were 16,000.

That’s how it began. From our point of view, we were fighting communism and from their point of view, they were fighting for independence from colonial powers. Lyndon Johnson didn’t know how to extricate us and, through steady escalation recommended by the generals, ultimately deployed 536,100 Americans on the ground in Southeast Asia.

By the time we finally understood the folly, and got out once and for all in 1975, the price we had paid was awful.  The war destroyed one presidency and contributed enormously to the destruction of another, and damaged our prestige worldwide. But that was the least of it. Over 58,000 American kids were killed fighting in Viet Nam, and over 304,000 wounded, many of whom are still being cared for in VHA hospitals today.

There were 1.3 million Viet Namese military and civilian deaths all told.

The “culture war” that took root at home during that period could be viewed as the greatest tragedy of all. The Red-Blue divide that poisons our society today is directly descended from the Viet Nam era divisions.

What was it all for? The “communists” won. We lost. So what? Do they threaten us more now? Did they threaten us at all then? Did our involvement there achieve anything positive? Are we better off for it in any way?

It is completely understandable that many families of those who lost their lives want to believe the cause was “just”, and that their loved ones served honorably and even heroically. You often hear it said, even now, that we “could have won” if we had only bombed the north, or deployed more troops, or whatever. But it should be clear now that there was nothing to “win”.  And the the honor and heroism of those who answered the call and paid with their lives or limbs is not diminished by the fact that the “cause” was illusory.

SS Arandora Star

On this day in 1940, Benito Mussolini declared war on Britain and France. The Brits and French had been trying to get the Italian dictator to join their fight against the Germans, and he almost did. But after Paris was occupied by the Germans, he had second thoughts, mainly that he didn’t want to stand by and watch one country conquer the entire European continent.

About the Italians joining their side, Hitler groused that,  “First they were too cowardly to take part. Now they are in a hurry so that they can share in the spoils.” Mussolini explained that he wanted to join the fight before the complete capitulation of France, because fascism “did not believe in hitting a man when he is down.” Right. They were famous for that, as I recall.

Anyway, Britain responded to this by rounding up Italian residents between the ages of 16-70 who had been in the country less than 20 years and putting them in internment camps. Kinda like what the U.S. did with their citizens of Japanese descent, no? Only without all the recriminations and apologies for years thereafter.

When the war began in 1939, the British set up tribunals across the country, 120 of them in all, to evaluate resident aliens and classify them into three categories based on what kind of threat they seemed to represent: Category A meant internment, Category B was no internment but subject to restrictions, and C was no internment or restrictions. By February, 1940, all 73,000 or so cases had been evaluated, with about 66,000 designated as Category C.

In May, the Brits interned another 8000 Germans, and, after Mussolini made his choice, went to work on the Italians. The British internment camps were filled up, so Canada and Australia generously offered to take some of the internees. 7500 of them were shipped oversees, using a fleet of five passenger liners, including the SS Arandora Star.

Arandora Star

On Tuesday, July 2, 1940, the Arandora Star was torpedoed and sunk, while en route to Canada, by a German U-boat, 75 miles west of the Irish coast.

According to this Wiki, the ship carried “734 interned Italian men, 479 interned German men, 86 German prisoners of war and 200 military guards. Her crew numbered 174 officers and men”.  805 people lost their lives before the Canadian destroyer, HMCS St. Laurent, arrived on the scene and rescued 868 survivors, of whom 586 were detainees. About a month later, bodies from the tragedy began washing up on the shores of Ireland and Scotland, and were buried there.

This account of the sinking begins by vilifying the British for their “callous disregard” of people based on their nationality, though it doesn’t mention the callous disregard of the Nazis who torpedoed a ship carrying civilian detainees who were allegedly their sympathizers. It notes that the loss of life, about half that of the Titanic sinking,

…”has no place in our common historical consciousness. It is, however, well known among the British-Italian population, and among the Scottish and Irish communities who tend the graves of the dead to this day.”

“Despite the impoverishment of their communities, over and over again these remote coastal villages paid and organised to bury the victims as if they were their own. In Scotland, these were not only enemy nationals but ones singled out for vilification by the government, but no matter; they were given the same reverence and respect as anyone else.”

This article on the sinking provides interesting background on the British internment policy as well as the sinking.

As the Germans often noted, krieg ist krieg.

 

 

“Have we learned nothing?”

Once again, the volcanic clouds of chaos-ash emanating from Mount Trump at all times have obscured real news that we should care about. But we’re all distracted, panicked, and immobilized by the tiny-handed “ratings machine” that leads the free world, and the unnecessary drama he thrives on.

While we were all glued to our TVs watching the Comey hearings yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 233-186 for a bill that would undo much of Dodd-Frank. The Comey hearings will ultimately have no effect on your life, but the repeal of Dodd-Frank will. If we were hoping to have our outrage validated, we were watching the wrong show.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as we apparently no longer remember, was passed after the 2008 financial crisis to try to rein in the excesses of Wall Street that very nearly caused a worldwide economic collapse.

The bill attempts to prevent predatory mortgage lending, restrict banks from making investments for themselves using your insured deposits, governs consumer lending by requiring clear disclosure of terms, separates the commercial and investment functions of a bank,  regulates derivatives such as the credit default swaps that were widely blamed for contributing to the 2008 financial crisis, and so on.

It was a bit like closing the barn door after the horses had gone, but trying to make it less likely that the barn door will be left open next time.

The House vote was, of course, along strict party lines. Walter Jones of North Carolina was the only Republican to vote against it. Maxine Waters of California said, “They are setting the stage for Wall Street to run amok and cause another financial crisis.”

This WaPo piece says,

Democrats defended the Dodd-Frank law, saying it has meant financial security for millions of people and that undoing it would encourage the kind of risky lending practices that invite future economic shocks.

They also oppose efforts to sharply curtail a consumer protection agency’s power to pursue companies that it determines have participated in unfair or deceptive practices in their financial products and services. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has returned $29 billion to 12 million consumers who were victims of deceptive marketing, discriminatory lending or other financial wrongdoing.

“All we’re doing is spending our time taking away protections for the American people and their futures. Have we learned nothing?” asked Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

Shortly after inauguration, Trump promised to do a “big number on Dodd-Frank”, calling it a “disaster”, the same term he uses to describe just about everything he doesn’t like. He’s attempting to deliver on yet another idiotic promise meant to accelerate the transfer of wealth from the many to the few, and the House of Representatives is proving a willing tool. Hopefully, the Senate will prevent Trump’s “big number” from doing further damage.

A lot of us were hoping Comey would do a “big number” on Trump. If only.

screw

Kansas snapping out of it?

Republicans don’t like taxes. Or government. But they could tolerate government if it had no money to do anything, i..e. if taxes were cut.

Every Republican running at the state or national level in recent memory has repeated basically the same idea: if you cut taxes and reduce regulations, you will unlock the creativity and potential of America’s entrepreneurs and thus unleash the greatest job-creation engine the world has ever known.

And, yes, a few hard-working and visionary people will become incredibly rich, fulfilling the “American dream”, but the rising tide will lift all boats and the benefits of this unrestricted free-enterprise will be better living for all our citizens as the newly-created wealth “trickles down”.

This has been repeated so often that it has become accepted as actually true, at least to the people repeating it.  To them, the tax-and-spend Democrats are crippling the economy, killing jobs, and ruining America. Cut taxes on the rich and all will be well.

The problem is that there is absolutely no evidence that it works that way and plenty of evidence that it doesn’t. The only part that ever actually works as expected is that a few people become incredibly rich. The trickling down part has never happened, but that doesn’t seem to impact the message or the messengers.

Kansas elected Sam Brownback as governor in 2010, and he took office in 2011. He had represented Kansas’ second congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1994 to 1996, part of Newt Gingrich’s Republican Revolution, and then was elected to fill the Senate seat vacated by Bob Dole.

Brownback pursued deep reductions in tax rates early in his administration, calling them a “real live experiment” in conservative governance.

His Wikipedia entry sums him up this way:

He opposes same-sex marriage and describes himself as pro-life. As Governor, Brownback signed into law the largest income tax cut in Kansas’ history, eliminating state income taxes for business profits realized as non-wage income, affecting mainly IRS “S filers.” Brownback turned down a $31.5 million grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to set up an insurance exchange as part of the federal health care reform law, signed a bill that blocked tax breaks for abortion providers, banned sex-selection abortions, and declared that life begins at fertilization.

The income tax cut generated a substantial budget deficit, affecting core government service, particularly in education, and led many former and current Republican officials to criticize his leadership in the run-up to the 2014 gubernatorial election and endorse his Democratic opponent, Paul Davis. Polls taken in September 2016 gave Brownback an approval rating of 23%, the lowest rating of all 50 governors in the United States. Brownback was reelected in a close race with a plurality, a margin of 3.7%.

But life got better, right? Tons of new jobs were created by that entrepreneurial job-creation engine, right? The benefits trickled down as promised, didn’t they? The “real live experiment” showed that Republicans have been right all along, right?

No. Of course not.

From this WaPo article:

kansas economyThe legislature began this year’s session with the government in a deficit of $350 million, leaving lawmakers mulling more budget cuts. They have drained the state’s reserves of cash, diverting money meant for roads, delaying payments to pension funds and, in essence, forcing local agencies to make loans to the state government.

Last year, the governor pushed back the schedule for 25 construction projects planned around the state, the climax of delays intended to keep more cash on hand. In March, Kansas’s Supreme Court ruled that the lack of funding for public schools violated the state’s constitution, forcing lawmakers to act.

But Republican legislators in Kansas seem to be waking up a little bit.

In a decisive repudiation of conservative tax-cutting philosophy, Kansas Republicans voted this week to reverse deep tax cuts enacted by Gov. Sam Brownback (R), a move that lays bare the challenges of one-party control and the risks for Republicans in Washington pursuing a similar policy at the national level.

Kansas’s legislature is overwhelmingly Republican, but moderate GOP lawmakers joined with Democrats after it became clear that support for Brownback’s policies had become a major political liability. In last year’s election, a number of Brownback’s allies lost key races to Democrats or moderate Republicans opposed to the tax cuts. On Tuesday, 18 of the state’s 31 GOP senators and 49 of the 85 Republican members of the House voted against the governor.

If Republicans in Kansas are finally snapping out of this destructive trance, maybe there’s some hope for the rest of the country as well. Fingers crossed.

Trump “charity”

CNN is really milking this Comey testimony thing. For days, they’ve had a permanent “countdown” displaying how many seconds are left before the Big Show.  Ratings! Revenue! Spectacle!

countdown

It’s pretty pathetic. I’m going to risk my reputation as the present-day Nostradamus and predict that when we finally hear what Comey has to say, it will be absolutely nothing you don’t already know. Yes, the “news” outlets will go crazy all day tomorrow and for a few days after, assuming the man-baby doesn’t come up with some huge distraction, wilder even than “tapped my wires”. But, as for Comey,  there’s no there there.

First of all, Comey’s primary concern is his reputation for being incorruptible, non-partisan, fair,  and, above all, not vindictive. This requires him to make no overtly anti-Trump statements or statements that could be deemed to be self-serving in refuting what the man-baby has spammed us with for weeks, even including the made-up exculpatory verbiage in the termination letter he sent to Comey. Remember that stuff about having assured Trump on three occasions that he wasn’t under investigation?

Second, we already know Comey’s version of events from various other sources. And it’s a highly believable, even obvious, account. Trump tried to influence him to drop the Flynn/Russia investigation, thereby committing the crime of Obstruction of Justice, an impeachable offense. Shocker.

And last, his testimony can never live up to the absurd advance hype it’s getting, no matter what. Maybe it won’t be as disappointing and deflating as Rachel Maddow’s “We’ve got Trump’s tax forms, tune in at 10:00” debacle, but I can promise you it won’t be worth the wait. Stop licking your chops. You’re going to remain hungry after this feast.

But this doesn’t mean there isn’t a little red meat for you in today’s news to keep you satisfied, at least until lunch. Let’s try this one from Forbes: How Donald trump Shifted Kids-Cancer Charity Money Into His Business.

The ABC News version says:

According to IRS filings, the Eric Trump Foundation in 2012 spent $59,085 on its annual Golf Invitational fundraiser held at the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, New York — money that skimmed from donations to St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital. Those expenses ballooned to $230,080 in 2013 and to $242,294 in 2014, according to the filings. It is unclear from these tax forms how much of those payments went to the Trump Organization.

Forbes reported that in 2011, costs for Eric Trump’s golf tournament fundraiser tripled because his father realized that the organization had not been charging for the event and there were no bills to prove it. The Foundation declined to provide Forbes with an itemized list of expenses for the tournament.

Charity experts told Forbes that the amount paid to the Trump Organization for a golf tournament fundraiser for St. Jude’s “defy any reasonable cost.”

This, of course, is further proof of the value of seeing Trump’s tax returns, but I guess that ship has sailed. No one who understands this needs to see this new evidence, and anyone who does need to see it isn’t listening and doesn’t care.

It does remind me once more of what Michael Bloomberg, someone who certainly knows,  said about Trump: bloomberg

Trump is who he is. He wants and needs to stiff everyone. Even kids with cancer.

This can’t go on

It’s just not normal. How can we go on pretending it’s normal? Or that it’s OK in any way? Are we so stunned by the rapidity of the change? Are we so ignorant of our own history and principles? Are we so consumed by partisanship that we must ignore the bizarre and outlandish, the inappropriate and outrageous, when it comes from our “team”?

The President of the United States tweeted this on Monday:

courts are political

He was upset because his “Travel Ban” has to be ruled on by a court before it can be made law, and he indulged in one of his now-standard early-morning “tweet storms”, or maybe “twitter tantrums”  describes it better.

tweets

These outbursts do not serve his interests in any way, and certainly do not serve our country’s interests. He is discrediting our system of justice. Who does that help?

The President of the United States has declared that the courts are “political”.

Is this what should now be taught to schoolchildren?

The President cannot, must not, say this. Even if it were true, which, God help us, it better not be, he cannot say this.

He is saying that our system of checks and balances is a sham.

He is saying the idea of an independent judiciary is a sham.

He is saying that any judicial appointment he makes is political.

He is saying that he expects “Republican” judges (there better not be such a thing!) will rule against Democrat plaintiffs, and vice versa.

He is saying he expects any judge he appoints to rule in his favor no matter what the law says.

He is saying that decisions made in his favor are also tainted, just as those that he doesn’t like.

He is saying that any decision passed down by the courts is made not on the basis of legal precedent or constitutional law, but on political grounds.

He is saying that no court decision is justice, but rather politics, so you are right to question decisions you don’t like, or to simply reject and ignore them. They do not carry the weight of “law”, but only “politics”.

He is saying the power of the presidency is not tempered or augmented by the judiciary, but that it is in opposition to it.

He is saying the courts do not function to protect us and our principles, but, like the media and any other institution that questions him, are the enemy. Until you co-opt them for your own team.

He is saying the rule of law is a fiction.

He is saying he does not like or trust our system of government.

He is saying that the authority of the courts and judges is not real.

The President said this. The sitting President of the United States.

Those who admire and trust him will certainly modify their thinking based on his “teachings”, and some will modify their behavior as well. There will be consequences.

FoxNews will “debate” the merits of these statements. They will repeat and support them, perhaps with minor modifications and explanations, rather than go against their “team”, thereby amplifying the effect and compounding the damage.

Those who see Trump for the impulsive, ignorant, narcissistic jackass he is can only shake their heads, yet again, in dismay and wonderment. Or possibly speak out, only to then be accused of God-knows-what by the other “side”. Liberalism? Political correctness? Defeatism? Anti-Americanism? Terrorist sympathies?

Where’s the outrage?

News and drugs

The other day Scott Pelley got fired from his job as the anchor of the CBS Evening News. CBS has traditionally been thought of as the best and most important of the network news operations, the home of Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite, and the news anchor position has been the most prestigious in the business for decades.  A shake-up at that spot has always been huge news in and of itself, and there was a lot of hand-wringing and speculation this time as well, although almost entirely within the industry.

pelley

But CBS Nightly News ratings trailed ABC and NBC, and news, like everything now, is a profit center. Pelley is out. His presentation of the day’s events wasn’t selling as well as the competitors’, even though the content was virtually identical.

There are two reasons why this doesn’t matter to me at all. The first is just my own taste, I suppose, and I probably shouldn’t even mention it, as it will surely anger those who disagree and it’s really not that important. But, as I’ve said before, that’s why Stewie is Generis, so here goes: Scott Pelley and Ted Baxter are virtually indistinguishable to me. They both simply read what’s put in front of them, quite obviously without any real understanding of it. And they both cultivate the silver-haired, square-jawed, steely look of authority and competence which masks any sign of who they might really be off-camera, as well as that phony “newsman’s voice”, meant to instill confidence in the truth and gravity of whatever they’re reading, however silly it may be.

baxter

The second reason Pelley’s firing doesn’t matter to me, and shouldn’t matter to anyone else either, is that network news itself no longer matters. It’s nothing but a re-hash of stuff that you already knew from the internet. It’s stale by the time they serve it to you. It might be 24 hours old or older and you’ve already determined whether you care about it.

There is no “journalism” involved – CBS is not “breaking” any stories with a network of far-flung correspondents and investigators. They are simply repeating what’s been on Twitter all day long, or even what CNN ran 10-12 hours earlier. And their standard is that if there are no spectacular images to go with the story, well, it’s just not news as far as they’re concerned.

And the really pathetic thing is they try to “tease” their stale stories to keep you tuned in through 3-4 minutes of ads: “You’ll be shocked at what President Trump tweeted last night at midnight – we’ll tell you after this…” No, I won’t be shocked. I saw it when he tweeted it 18 hours ago, and it didn’t shock me then. It wasn’t newsworthy at the time and it’s already been covered to death by everyone else all day long, including by the crack reporting staff at Get Off My Lawn.

So who’s watching these network “news” programs? Only people who don’t have the internet. In other words, only old people. And the proof is right there before your eyes. Those ads they want you to watch are virtually all drug advertisements and all for ailments that affect older people primarily.

There are a zillion new drugs you never heard of a couple of years ago that you are now bombarded with ads about during the newscast.   The drug companies know exactly who’s watching.

drug graph

I’d never heard of any of these drugs before, and now I can’t avoid them: Latuda (depression), Harvoni (hepatitis C), Rexulti (depression), Lyrica (nerve and muscle pain), Eliquis (stroke prevention), Xeljanz (rheumatoid arthritis), Viberzi (irritable bowel syndrome), Invokana (Type 2 Diabetes), Humira (arthritis), Jublia (toe fungus),  Xarelto (stroke prevention).

Maybe you’re taking one or more of these, or maybe you’re a medical professional who has known all about them for years, but that’s not my point. My point is that I have as many ailments as the next guy and the only way I’m aware of these drugs is from direct-to-consumer advertising.  My thesis is that most people have had the same experience.

Over $5 Billion dollars in drug ads were purchased last year and it’s been trending up for some time.

Following graph from this site:

drug spending

The A.M.A. has called for a ban on direct-to-consumer ad spending. The only two countries that allow direct-to-consumer drug advertising are the U.S. and New Zealand.

 

most advertised

16 drugs accounted for more than $100 million in advertising last year.

This report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (obviously created pre-Trump) says prescription drugs accounted for nearly 17 percent of total health care spending in 2015, up from about 7 percent in the 1990s, due in large part to rising prices for brand-name treatments.

Senator Al Franken (D-Minn.) introduced a bill to eliminate the tax breaks that drug makers can take to offset their spending on ad campaigns. He said it was a “common sense measure to help cut down health care costs.”

On the other side of this fight is the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. It’s the industry trade group and has rejected efforts to limit ads saying the ads are useful for informing patients about their treatment options and help them avoid health emergencies.

I’m tempted to agree that there is probably more new information transmitted in these ads than in the alleged “news” that surrounds them, but that would be ignoring the difference between information and advocacy.

Nine out of ten of the biggest pharmaceutical companies actually spend more on advertising than on R&D, which should tell you something about the whole process. Note that Jublia, the toe-fungus treatment, costs about $600 a bottle but is proven to work in fewer than 20 percent of users, according to Consumer Reports.

Which side do you think the Trump administration will support? I don’t know but I can guess – as with all crime stories, you’ll find the bad guys if you  “follow the money”.

Baseball strikes out

Baseball is boring. There, I said it. I don’t think it can survive the short attention-span and demand for non-stop action that are characteristic of life in the internet age.

The games can routinely stretch into four-hour long marathons of nothingness, punctuated by the occasional instant of action or excitement. Baseball games used to take no more than two hours. The average time to complete nine innings so far this year is 3:06, while in 1978 it was 2:28, and in 1930 it was 1:09. There are lots of factors that explain this:

TV advertising dollars.  As with everything else, ad revenue now rules baseball, and if they can sell more ads, they will. This translates to longer pauses between innings, so that TV viewers can be assaulted with ads.

Pitching changes. We are in an era of specialization. In the past, starting pitchers were expected to go all nine innings, and relief pitching was rarely used. Now, you hope to get five or maybe six innings from your starter, then go to your set-up man for the seventh and eighth, and finally your closer for the ninth. If any of the three have problems, you have to go back to the bullpen and change again. Before each change, the pitching coach has to come out to the mound to discuss things with the incumbent, everything from how he feels to peace in the Middle East, in order to give the next guy a chance to get loose in the pen. When the new pitcher finally does arrive, he has to adjust to the mound with a bunch of warm-up pitches. Tick tock.

Batters wandering around between pitches. This pernicious waste of time started in the 1970’s with one or two guys notorious for doing it – Mike Hargrove and Carlton Fisk come to mind – but now everyone does it. Step out of the batter’s box, look around, adjust your batting gloves, check the third base coach for signs, check the heavens for support or a weather change. It takes forever. Batters used to just stay put and wait for the next pitch.

Advanced metrics. There’s a new “science” called Sabermetrics that has come to rule baseball. It consists of analyzing everything that happens during a game and using computer models to figure out if it helps or hurts. And I mean everything. I won’t bore you with examples, but it’s become quite absurd.  Many aspects of the game that made it interesting have been devalued: stolen bases, bunting, good defense, for example. It has been determined that these things don’t contribute to winning.

There are a couple of Sabermetric measurements which contribute more than others to stretching out the game and making it more one-dimensional, i.e. boring.

One is that it has been determined that the more pitches you can force the opposing pitcher to make, the better your chances are of getting him out of the game. The sooner you get him out, the sooner you can start to work on their second-line bullpen pitchers. The more of them you can tire out, the better your chances of facing one who’s having an off-day and maybe getting some hits. And even if you lose the current game, your chances of winning tomorrow or the next day, when you’ll be playing this same opponent, have improved because their pitchers will all be tired. Pitchers can only throw so many pitches without several days of rest in between to be effective.

Sabermetrics has determined that starting pitchers, in particular, must be held to a precise pitch count for each outing, usually about 100 pitches, after which it has been determined they must sit down, no matter how well they’re doing. All this calculation means more pitching changes which translates to longer games.

The disciplined teams are “taking” more pitches (not swinging) to achieve this goal, so more pitches have to be thrown in each game to get to the end. Add in all the walking around between pitches and the effect is amplified.

All this leads into a discussion of the real problem that underlies the transformation of an already less than heart-stopping two hours into a four hour slog, a problem that not only contributes to the time needed to play the game, but also makes it intrinsically less interesting to watch:  it has been determined that striking out is not a bad thing.

There is no shame in striking out anymore, and, in fact, it can make you a lot of money if you do it right. Here are a couple of examples to help make this point.

Mike Napoli, currently with the Texas Rangers, has been a highly desired commodity in his 12-year major-league career, even though he is apparently a mediocre hitter with a life-time average of .249, somewhat less than the aggregate average of all players in history. He drives in a few more runners than many other players and hits a few more home-runs, but has never come close to leading the league in these categories.

Mike Napoli strikes out more per plate appearance than almost anyone who has ever played the game. He is painful to watch. But he’s better than everyone else at one thing, and that thing is highly valued by Sabermetricians: he sees more pitches per at-bat than anyone else, meaning that he “takes” more and “spoils” more (by fouling them off) before striking out. Time stands still when Napoli steps in to hit.

Napoli played on the 2013 World Series Champion Red Sox, and had three other teammates who also struck out more per plate appearance than just about anyone else: Jared Saltalamacchia, Jonny Gomes, and David Ross. That 2013 team struck out a lot, more than just about every other team in the league, and still won it all. But they were very boring to watch.

The Baltimore Orioles are paying Chis Davis $23 Million this year and for each of the next five. He hits a lot of home runs but strikes out way more than anyone else in a season. He’s leading the American League this year with 83 strikeouts as I write this, less than one third of the way through the season.  By contrast, in 1941, Joe DiMaggio struck out 37 times during the entire season. Davis led the league in strikeouts each of the last two years, striking out a total of 437 times over those two years. DiMaggio struck out only 359 times over his entire 13-year career.

Davis can be expected to hit a home run once every four games or so. The rest of the time he’s striking out.  Davis and Napoli are just examples. The strikeout is ruining baseball, which already has enough issues.

I wrote about Jim Bunning the other day, but I didn’t bother to mention that at the time of his retirement, he had struck out more batters, 2855 in his 17 years, than anyone in history except Walter Johnson. That was in an era when hitters would do anything to avoid striking out. Bunning mentioned how hard it was to face the likes of Yogi Berra, who struck out only 414 times over 19 years (less than Chris Davis in the last two years), and Stan Musial, who struck out 696 times in 22 years. The list goes on.

Striking out was something for a batter to try to avoid then, but not now. Bunning’s achievement is all the more impressive in this context. Today,  Bunning is only 17th on the list of career strikeouts. All those who have passed him have done so in the era of the re-evaluated strikeout, even though they are indisputably great pitchers.

The game itself has changed, and not for the better. Now, it’s just boring to watch.

 

 

Separate but Equal 2.0

Remember when “Separate but Equal” was an abhorrent racist euphemism? It used to refer to the legal doctrine, according to which racial segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted at the close of the Civil War, which guaranteed “equal protection” under the law to all citizens.

Using this doctrine, state and local governments could require that services, facilities, public accommodations, housing, medical care, education, employment, and transportation be segregated by race, as long as the facilities provided to each race were “equal”.

 

sep3

sep2

sep4

It was widely understood, though, that services and facilities offered to African Americans were almost never “equal” in any real sense. The repeal of laws that divided people by race, known as “Jim Crow” laws, was the focus of the Civil Rights movement, and in 1954, the Supreme Court decision in Brown vs. Board of Education formally overturned the “Separate but Equal” doctrine.

But there was still a lot of work to do. Most black people understood that the only path to their rightful place in American society was full “integration”, and that was the basis of Martin’s message. In his “I Have a Dream” speech, he notes that 100 years after the Civil War, African Americans are still  “badly crippled by the manacles of segregation”.

mlk1

Of course, Malcolm had a slightly different message, and one that resonated at least as strongly as Martin’s, that focused more on independence than integration. But everyone understood that “Separate but Equal” was not the answer, and the focus of all our collective efforts over the years was to refute it.

But, with time, the odious phrase lost its bite and actually came to represent something desirable for some young people. It’s a bit disorienting to hear black high school students advocating for segregated proms, for example, using the that very same phrase. You can’t help but feeling they haven’t read their history when you hear this.

Yesterday, I wrote about events at Evergreen State College, where white people were asked to stay away from campus for a day. Today, I’m reading that Harvard has held separate commencements for students of color. At their request.

harv1

Everything old is new again.

Equity Action Plan

Somehow, the word “equity” has come to replace the word “equality” in the pedagogic vernacular in discussions of racism on campus. Maybe it’s because my own concerns are so far removed from those of today’s college student, but when I hear the word “equity”, I think of this now-secondary definition:

“the money value of a property or of an interest in a property in excess of claims or liens against it”

Indeed, the first definition in the online version of the Merriam Webster dictionary is now:

“justice according to natural law or right; specifically :  freedom from bias or favoritism”

It’s a little confusing to someone on the outside, but it feels a little bit like the goal of ensuring that everyone has the same opportunity to achieve has been replaced with the goal of ensuring that everyone achieves the same outcome.   And it’s not immediately obvious to the lay person what the deficiencies of the now obsolete term, “equality”, might have been.

Evergreen State College has an Equity Action Plan. It’s an impenetrable thicket of jargon, but the gist of it is that racism explains just about everything that’s wrong. It’s got different “goals” listed, including Content Goals, Process Goals, Outcome Goals, and a single Equity Goal, which is:

• Our equity goal, simply put but not simply achieved, is to substantially improve the experiences of underserved students on our campus so that we close equity gaps in student learning and student success. An “equity gap” is an unequitable difference—read “worse”— between the experiences, opportunities, and/or outcomes of underserved students. We choose “underrepresented” and “underserved” with intention, in recognition of the power of language to name the problem as one of historical exclusion from ‘the academe’ and its power and resources, eschewing language that sources the problem as the students themselves (“at risk”) or in a negative light (“minority”).

In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, Bruce Weinstein, a biology professor at the college, voiced his disagreement with the Plan.

The plan and the way it is being forced on the college are both deeply authoritarian, and the attempt to mandate equality of outcome is unwise in the extreme. Equality of outcome is a discredited concept, failing on both logical and historical grounds, as anyone knows who has studied the misery of the 20th century. It wouldn’t have withstood 20 minutes of reasoned discussion.

This presented traditional independent academic minds with a choice: Accept the plan and let the intellectual descendants of Critical Race Theory dictate the bounds of permissible thought to the sciences and the rest of the college, or insist on discussing the plan’s shortcomings and be branded as racists. Most of my colleagues chose the former, and the protesters are in the process of articulating the terms. I dissented and ended up teaching in the park.

Weinstein also disagreed with the “Day of Absence” at Evergreen, where all white people have been asked to stay off campus. He wrote an email protesting the event which induced accusations of racism and ignited a campus firestorm.

email

This has given outlets like Breitbart apoplexy.  To be honest, the concept of asking any group to stay away does seem a little over the edge, although the idea of being on the same side as Breitbart on this or any issue is dread-inducing at best.

The Washington Times reports some of the action this way:

A video of the confrontation, captured by Mr. Vincent, shows Mr. Weinstein attempting to reason with dozens of students who routinely shout him down, curse at him and demand his resignation.

When the professor tells the students he will listen to them if they listen to him, one student responds, “We don’t care what terms you want to speak on. This is not about you. We are not speaking on terms — on terms of white privilege. This is not a discussion. You have lost that one.”

Another protester asks the professor whether he believes “black students in sciences are targeted.”

After asking for a clarification, Mr. Weinstein says, “I do not believe that anybody on our faculty, with intent, specially targets students of color.”

That remark prompts shrieks of outrage.

Weinstein, a lifelong liberal, is now literally under siege and his resignation has been demanded. In a lengthy interview on the Rubin Report, he claims that student protesters threatened to kidnap him

Equity in action at Evergreen State College. Ugh.

Jim Bunning

A very small number of people have achieved great success at the highest level of professional sports and gone on to be elected to national office. Jack Kemp comes to mind, and Steve Largent, both of whom were great pro football players and served in the House of Representatives.  And, of course, NBA Hall-of-Famer and U.S. Senator Bill Bradley. Am I forgetting anyone? My sincere apologies if so.

Jim Bunning joined this small group when he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1985.  He served six terms in the House, representing Kentucky’s 4th district. In 1998 he was elected to the Senate and re-elected in 2004. He was 85 when he died last Friday.

bunning

He led an interesting life, an impactful life, and ordinarily I’d feel happy to write a little about someone like that. But Jim Bunning did a lot of things as a congressman that make him an outlier, and not in a good way.  He often found himself at odds with fellow Republicans and often caused controversy.

In the Senate, he was routinely given the highest “conservative” score by those that calculate such things. He opposed Obamacare, of course. A Catholic with nine children, he was strongly anti-abortion. He made inappropriate remarks about his opponents and Supreme Court justices.

This NPR piece says,
As a politician, he was known as “blunt and abrasive,” according to Politico. “In 1993, for instance, he referred to President Bill Clinton as ‘the most corrupt, the most amoral, the most despicable person I’ve ever seen in the presidency.’ In 2009, he made headlines by predicting Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would be dead of cancer within nine months.”

Bunning single-handedly held up unemployment payments for millions of Americans during a two-day filibuster against $10 billion in stimulus spending.

According to this CNN piece, Bunning decided to leave the Senate in 2010 after tension with his own party.

“Unfortunately, running for office is not just about the issues,” Bunning said in a 2009 statement. “Over the past year, some of the leaders of the Republican Party in the Senate have done everything in their power to dry up my fundraising. The simple fact is that I have not raised the funds necessary to run an effective campaign for the U.S. Senate.”

The remark appeared to be a thinly veiled hit at fellow Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, who was the Senate minority leader at the time.

Bunning butted heads with McConnell more than once and called him a “control freak”.  “McConnell is leading the ship, but he is leading it in the wrong direction. If Mitch McConnell doesn’t endorse me, it could be the best thing that ever happened to me in Kentucky.”

Asked by The New York Times in March 2009 whether he felt betrayed by some Republican colleagues, Mr. Bunning replied, “When you’ve dealt with Ted Williams and Mickey Mantle and Yogi Berra and Stan Musial, the people I’m dealing with are kind of down the scale.”

Reading that made me think back to the first time the name “Jim Bunning” penetrated my consciousness.

On July 20, 1958, he took the mound for the Detroit Tigers in Boston’s Fenway Park and pitched a no-hit, no-run game against the Red Sox. That had only been done twice before in the 46-year history of Fenway, both times by Hall-of-Famers. Walter Johnson did it in 1920 and Ted Lyons in 1926.

bunning2

Fenway is noted for its “Green Monster”, the huge wall in left field that appears to be just a few feet beyond the infield, and its lack of foul ground – hitters can stay alive on fouls that would be caught for outs in other venues.

It’s a hitter’s paradise and a pitcher’s nightmare. The Red Sox always tailored their line-ups for Fenway and routinely produced batting champs. Of course their own pitchers had to pitch in Fenway as well, so it didn’t translate too well into actual wins.

The line-up Bunning faced that day included a bunch of guys who were hard to get out on any day, and who were hitting over .300 at the time: Frank Malzone, Jackie Jensen, Pete Runnels, and, of course, the Greatest Hitter Who Ever Lived,  Ted Williams, who Bunning retired for the final out of the game.

The 26-year old Bunning was coming off a great 1957 season in which he led the American League with 20 wins. He had a side-arm delivery that gave right-handed hitters the impression the ball was coming at them from somewhere around third base. He was known for his combative nature, burning desire to win, and willingness to throw a “purpose pitch” when he thought it was needed, i.e. to hit an opposing batter to make him a little less comfortable digging in against him.

Bunning led the league in hit-batsmen four years in a row, and had 160 for his career. That’s more than anyone else in the last 90 years except for Tim Wakefield and Charlie Hough, both knuckle-ball pitchers who really didn’t know what was going to happen to the ball after it left their hands.  And if the knuckle-ball did hit a batter, everyone knew it was an accident and getting hit by the floater didn’t hurt a bit in any case.

Tiger team-mate Frank Bolling said, “If he had to brush back his mother, I think he’d do it to win.”

Bunning didn’t appreciate opposing players talking trash at him, either. He once threw at the always-talkative Red Sox center-fielder, Jim Piersall, for jawing at him too much. That one was a little unusual because Piersall wasn’t batting at the time, but waiting his turn in the on-deck circle.

Team-mate Larry Bowa told a story about Bunning’s approach, which is quoted in this NYT Obit, about a game that he pitched at Montreal in the early 1970s.

“The Expos had Ron Hunt, a guy who loved to get hit. Well, Bunning threw him a sidearm curveball, Hunt never moved, and it hit him. The ball rolled toward the mound, and Bunning picked it up. He looked right at Hunt and said: ‘Ron, you want to get hit? I’ll hit you next time.’ And next time up, bam. Fastball. Drilled him right in the ribs. And he said to Hunt, ‘O.K., now you can go to first base.’”

Bunning thoughtfully described pitching the no-hitter this way:

“For most pitchers like me, who aren’t overpowering supermen with extraordinary stuff like Sandy Koufax or Nolan Ryan, a no-hitter is a freaky thing.  You can’t plan it.  It’s not something you can try to do.  It just happens. Everything has to come together – good control, outstanding plays from your teammates, a whole lot of good fortune on your side and a lot of bad luck for the other guys.  A million things could go wrong – but on this one particular day of your life none of them do.”

He was traded to the Phillies in 1963, and was as effective in the National League as he had been in the American.  He pitched a “perfect game” (retired all 27 men he faced) against the Mets in New York on June 21, 1964, the first one pitched in the National League in 84 years, thereby revealing his previous comments about pitching a no-no to be overly modest.

To get elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame, you need to get 75% of the votes from the Baseball Writers Association of America, and you have only 15 years of eligibility after retirement. Bunning came close, but never got the nod from the writers. But in 1996, 25 years after he retired, he was voted in by the Veteran’s Committee, which included many players who had tried unsuccessfully to hit his pitching. “The writers never faced him,” Hall of Fame shortstop Luis Aparicio said at Bunning’s induction ceremony.

As a Boston baseball fan and someone who thinks government can actually solve problems once in a while, I always dreaded it when my team had to go up against Bunning. I didn’t like to see him standing on the pitcher’s mound opposing us and I didn’t like to see him standing in Congress opposing us either.

But give the devil his due: Jim Bunning knew what he wanted to do, did things not because they were politically expedient but because he believed in them, went about achieving his objectives in his own unique way, always fought hard, and never backed down.

Mr. Trump’s Wild Ride

It had to happen.

covfefe

Is there no one who can get Trump to stop tweeting? We’ve been asking this question since long before the election, and for a long time the answer has been quite clear. No, there is no one can who convince the man-baby that he would be much better off, and even enjoy higher approval ratings, if he could just control himself a little better. Not Hope Hicks, Kellyanne Conway, or Sean Spicer.  Not even Jared or Ivanka, those two phantoms who allegedly have the strongest influence on him.

But he just can’t do it. Saying that he’s “impulsive” doesn’t describe what we’re seeing here. It’s more like a schizophrenic toddler with Tourette’s.

It’s often been noted that his tweets are craziest when he’s alone. At night before bed or when he’s just woken up in the morning is the real danger zone. There’s no one around to stop him then. Maybe it would be different if his spouse lived with him. Who has a greater interest in keeping your foot out of your mouth and the power to do it? Remember the strong and effective influence exerted by  Rosalynn Carter or Nancy Reagan?  It wasn’t a bad thing.

Sooner or later, Trump was going to make an international joke out of himself (and, thereby, all the rest of us), with some completely incoherent or accidental tweet. Last night was the night.

covfefetweet

Obviously, he hit “Send” before he meant to, probably while trying to correct what he’d written, but that’s exactly the point. He’s the President of the United States. Every word he says has the potential to move markets, dominate the international news, impact global alliances, or even start wars. He can’t be carelessly, accidentally, or even impulsively hitting “Send” any more than he can “Launch” or “Strike” or “Detonate” or whatever it actually says on that red button on the “nuclear football”.

nfootball

And he didn’t delete it for hours, prompting speculation that maybe he’d had a medical episode of some sort.

Almost immediately, #COVFEFE was trending on social media and all kinds of great jokes and memes were speeding around the internet. Check some of them out here. Trump is an international laughingstock. Again.

Coincidentally, the talent pool for new hires is also running dry. No one wants to work for this guy. Would you? Not knowing whether what you say today will be contradicted or undermined tomorrow? Knowing for sure that you’ll be fired at some point? The number of people who are willing to sign up for Mr. Trump’s Wild Ride now is tiny, and few competent pros are among them. Trump only really trusts family members, and they’re already all on the payroll.

What a mess.

Trump women honor the fallen

The Trump women set an appropriately respectful tone over the Memorial Day weekend, honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice to protect our freedoms. Each woman rose to the occasion in her own unique way.

Melania chose to set a somber example by donning a $51,000 jacket by Dolce & Gabbana in Sicily, where the average annual income is $23,400.

meljacket

I’m certain she was thinking of the Allied Invasion of Sicily the whole time, in which 2811 American soldiers lost their lives and 6471 were wounded. The loss of American life there exceeded the losses on D-Day, when the allies landed in Normandy. About 5000 Canadian and British troops were also killed in Sicily, or missing in action, and 6500 wounded.

I didn’t read anything about a visit to the Sicily-Rome American Cemetery where 7861 of our dead are buried, but she must have gone there, right?

sicily

To add a bit more perspective to Melania’s wardrobe choices, consider that the CBO scoring of the revised Republican bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act mentions some interesting figures:

Older Americans who make little money and buy individual insurance would see their premiums climb far beyond what they would be under Obamacare. A 64-year-old making $26,500 would pay $1,700 in premiums annually under Obamacare. In a state making those “moderate” changes to its market, that 64-year-old would pay $13,600, and in a state with no waivers, the cost would be $16,100. That’s more than nine times that person’s premium under the Affordable Care Act.

Ivanka, too, got into the right spirit over the weekend. Her blog suggested these activities as a way to honor the fallen:

Pack your basket with summer noodles and watermelon coolers

Heed Jamie Oliver’s ten tips for grilling the perfect feast

Wear all white. If we’re following the rules, it’s the first day we can wear it

Blast some tunes with this road-trip playlist

Cap the night off with a champagne popsicle.

popsicle

The champagne popsicle is a Memorial Day tradition here at GOML, the perfect way to respect and remember.

Meanwhile, the ever-sincere and never-exploitive Kellyanne Conway just about broke the internet with this tweet:

tweet1

Lots of appropriate responses to this in the above link, including,

“Our brave @POTUS got 5 draft deferments, attacked a gold star family, took a vet’s Purple Heart, and sent men to die in Yemen over dinner.”

“Grossly grossly embarrassing and disrespectful hearing this from conway Disgusting.”

“No it isn’t, if that were true you and @Potus would feel some sense of shame when denigrating one of their ranks.”

“Gold Star families are very special & I will never forget how rude and disgusting @realDonaldTrump @POTUS was to Khizr Khan and wife.”

 

 

 

Angry Germans on the move

This article in the Washington Post yesterday describes Angela Merkel giving a speech in which she says that Europe “really must take our fate into our own hands.”  She’s the leader of the most powerful country in Europe and is saying that, based on Trump’s behavior and words on his recent trip, they can no longer rely on U.S. support, that those days were  “over to a certain extent. This is what I have experienced in the last few days.”

Trump managed to piss off the Germans and all the other members of NATO on this trip, as only he can do. Here at GOML, we have mixed emotions about all this.

Our first, visceral reaction is, “yeah, good idea – fight your own battles for a change”. But then I realized I was taking a baby step towards falling under the spell of the man-baby’s populist, history-averse, fact-free, bullying, Make-America-Great-Again, ignorant blathering.

Hang on, I thought, I’m looking at the leader of Germany advocating German strength to over a thousand closet übermenschen in a Munich beer hall, and getting a prolonged standing ovation. We’ve seen this picture before,  and should understand where it can lead.

merkel

Today’s German loves to think of himself as an environment-respecting, tolerant, pacifist and conscientious objector, or, if he’s of a certain age, a heroic member of The Resistance. But scratch the surface and add a couple of liters of Weizenbock, and you’ve got, well, the same old German we’ve all learned to admire so much over the years. For 70-some years, they’ve been keeping their heads down and channeling all their energy into building expensive cars and whatnot, but now the man-baby has them stirring again.

In the comment section of the WaPo piece, someone calling himself AngryGermans, starts by rightly pointing out that the Germans have promised to spend 2% of their GNP on NATO by 2024 and they are not in arrears, as Trump has bloviated (is there no one who can correct him on these things?), and so on. But he finally works himself up to:

Everyone in Germany hates the thought to have nuclear weapons. That said, i don’t think we would hesitate to build them if needed. Yeah and Germany won’t take years for it, like North Korea or Iran. We can do that in weeks.

To which someone who sounds suspiciously like Stewie Generis replies,

The proof that Trump is an idiot: he’s now got AngryGermans bragging that they can build nuclear weapons in weeks and their leader getting a standing ovation in a Munich beer hall for advocating German strength (sound familiar?). Angry Germans have shown themselves, repeatedly, to be the greatest threat to peace and sanity the world has ever seen. Thanks, President Crazypants. Wait till you get a load of what angry Germans will do to the rest of us as soon as their economy turns south.

Anyway, how does it serve our interests to undo decades of European/American diplomacy intended to keep the Russian bear out of Europe and the Germans under our military control?

It doesn’t. But you know whose interests it does serve? Wait for it…

I’ll give you a clue: his name begins with “P” and rhymes with shootin’.

putin

Fritz Knöchlein

Yesterday was the anniversary of the 1940 Massacre at Le Paradis, in northern France. Trying to reach boats waiting at the port at Dunkirk to evacuate them, about 100 soldiers of the Royal Norfolk Regiment, part of the British Expeditionary Force fighting alongside the French, retreated to a farmhouse at Le Paradis, about 40 miles from the port.

They held off units from Germany’s SS-Totenkopfdivision (Death’s Head division) until they ran out of ammunition, and then tried to surrender. Two soldiers came out of the farmhouse waving a white flag and were mowed down by machine-gun fire from the Germans.

When they tried again, they were led to an open field where all their property was taken from them, then stood up against a barn wall where machines guns on tripods had been placed and where a pit had been dug.  Fritz Knöchlein was the SS-Haupsturmfuhrer and commander of SS-Totenkopf-Infanterie-Regiment 2 who gave the order to shoot the British soldiers. The Germans, as was their custom, then bayoneted any that were not yet dead.

farm

The massacre site

Miraculously, two soldiers survived. Albert Pooley and William O’Callaghan waited in the rain until dark then crawled out and hid for a couple of days in a pig-sty. They managed to get their wounds tended to, but they had no way to escape and again surrendered to the Germans. This time they were held as POWs, and, in April 1943, Pooley, who had a badly injured leg, was exchanged for some German POWs. When he got back to England, his account of the events was not believed.

But when O’Callaghan returned after the war and confirmed the story, an investigation was opened. A British military tribunal in Hamburg found Captain Fritz Knöchlein guilty of a war crime, and he was hanged at age 37 on January 21, 1949.

In this video, at about the 1:30 mark, you’ll find a story that includes the recollection of Bill Pooley who returned to the site.

fritz

Fritz Knöchlein

Fritz always proclaimed his innocence with the usual progression of Nazi reasoning that went, more or less, along these lines: It never happened. OK, it happened, but I wasn’t there. OK, I was there but not in charge. OK, I was in charge, but I had no choice under the circumstances. OK I had a choice, but I followed orders. OK, I did it on my own, but you did worse and deserved it. You tortured me while in custody. Spare me because I have a wife and family.

Knöchlein was held in the infamous London Cage, and wrote letters of complaint about his treatment there.

In the internet age, it is always possible to explore all “sides” of any issue. This site for example, reiterates Knöchlein’s version:

Knöchlein alleges that because he was “unable to make the desired confession” he was stripped, given only a pair of pyjama trousers, deprived of sleep for four days and nights, and starved. The guards kicked him each time he passed, he alleges, while his interrogators boasted that they were “much better” than the “Gestapo in Alexanderplatz”. After being forced to perform rigorous exercises until he collapsed, he says he was compelled to walk in a tight circle for four hours. On complaining to Scotland that he was being kicked even “by ordinary soldiers without a rank”, Knöchlein alleges that he was doused in cold water, pushed down stairs, and beaten with a cudgel. Later, he says, he was forced to stand beside a large gas stove with all its rings lit before being confined in a shower which sprayed extremely cold water from the sides as well as from above. Finally, the SS man says, he and another prisoner were taken into the gardens behind the mansions, where they were forced to run in circles while carrying heavy logs.

  “Since these tortures were the consequences of my personal complaint, any further complaint would have been senseless,” Knöchlein wrote. “One of the guards who had a somewhat humane feeling advised me not to make any more complaints, otherwise things would turn worse for me.” Other prisoners, he alleged, were beaten until they begged to be killed, while some were told that they could be made to disappear.

That piece goes on to give a long “proof” about how Knöchlein was the wrong guy, and how the real culprit was already dead, and the Brits just needed someone to hold accountable, and poor Fritz was elected, and so on and so forth.

It’s like everything else nowadays. You get to decide for yourself which side of the story you like best, and one is no better than another.

#FireKushner

kushner

As I write this, the hashtag #FireKushner is trending on Twitter. I have no idea what this actually means – for all I know,  the marketing department at Twitter has figured out that I want to hear this and they’re showing it only to me, because somehow someone will make some money if I see it.  The internet works in mysterious ways.

But something does seem to be happening out there. I’ve said many times that Trump has nothing to fear from the fact-based world as long as his “No Regerts” legions remain in their bizarre self-imposed hypnotic trance. And nothing will change for them until their beloved FoxNews changes something.

Every time I get a hopeful text or email from someone exclaiming that some incriminating piece of evidence has been uncovered that will finally sink the toxic tiny-handed man-baby, I tell them to wake me up when they see it on FoxNews.

But Roger Ailes died last week, and I can still hear someone singing “Ding dong the witch is dead” from the direction of Harvard Square every time I open a window. And Bill O’Reilly is gone, a casualty not so much of his horrible behavior, or of management’s desire to bring their organizational culture in line with the accepted norms of the rest of the world, but rather of the decline in advertising revenue he was bringing in.

And now Sean Hannity, the craziest of them all and the last of those who were there from the beginning,  has been given a “time out” for his reckless non-stop hawking of yet another fake Democrats-are-murderers conspiracy story, oblivious to the damage he was doing to the family of Seth Rich.

Those of us who pretend to understand how this works realized right away that the reason for this particular horror-show was to allow Hannity to avoid mentioning the unfolding Trump/Russia story for days at a time. That’s on page one of the Fox/Hannity play book. But, amazingly, FoxNews actually retracted the story, something they never do.

And as I mentioned yesterday, a FoxNews reporter was among the first to debunk Greg Gianforte’s slanderous fabrication that he strangled a Guardian Reporter because the guy had been aggressive with him. That’s a version that, in the past, FoxNews might have put out there and hammered on for a few days until the “Who can ever know the real truth” smoke-screen descended over it and neutralized the assault. But they didn’t.

And when I click on foxnews.com this morning, I’m surprised to see them featuring two stories that , on the surface, seem anti-Trump. The first was about John Boehner saying Trump’s administration has been a “complete disaster”, and the second is about how Jared Kushner tried to get a secret communications channel with Russia.

Mind you, I haven’t actually read either of these stories, or turned my TV to FoxNews – I’m a little afraid of what I’ll find out if I do. Maybe that Hillary Clinton impersonated Kushner and is the real culprit? Maybe that Boehner was actually quoting some “extreme left-wing” critic of Trump’s and went on to rebut the whole thing? Don’t know and don’t care.

The point is that something does seem to be happening out there. Maybe you can wake me up now.

“Not in our minds!”

Yesterday, Montana elected multimillionaire businessman Greg Gianforte to its one seat in the House of Representatives in a closely watched special election. Gianforte was hand-picked by the Republican party to run against Democrat Rob Quist, a folk-singer and musician, for the seat vacated by Ryan Zinke, who became President Donald Trump’s Secretary of the Interior.

Assault charges had been filed against Gianforte earlier for throwing a reporter from The Guardian to the ground and strangling him after the reporter asked him about the new Congressional Budget Office scoring of the latest Republican health care bill, which, if passed, would mean 23 million people would ultimately lose health care coverage.

As he grabbed the reporter, Ben Jacobs, by the throat, Gianforte screamed that he was “sick and tired of you guys … get the hell out of here.”

Gianforte has often been compared with Trump. “Greg thinks he’s Donald Trump,”one observer in Monatana said.  “He thinks he could shoot a guy on Fifth Avenue and get away with it.” Nancy Pelosi called him a wannabe Trump.

In true Trump style, Gianforte first made up some nonsense about how Jacobs had been aggressive with him, but that story was quickly debunked by witnesses. FoxNews, remarkably, was among the first news organizations to set the record straight. Their reporter, Alicia Acuna, was there and said,

To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.

Three of the largest newspapers in Montana had endorsed Gianforte, but retracted their endorsements after the incident. None endorsed Quist, however. Gianforte has a history of Trump-like interactions with the press. The Independent Record said in an editorial,

We are also sick and tired – of Gianforte’s incessant attacks on the free press. In the past, he has encouraged his supporters to boycott certain newspapers, singled out a reporter in a room to point out that he was outnumbered, and even made a joke out of the notion of choking a news writer, and these are not things we can continue to brush off.

They also said,

We do not want this to be construed as an endorsement for any of Gianforte’s opponents, however. And we encourage all voters to review the information available, listen to their conscience, and vote for the best candidate for Montana at the polls today.

This is what passes, in Republican circles, for “taking the high road”. Paul Ryan, always a leader on Republican expeditions up the high road, also suggested Gianforte should apologize. Of course, a large percentage of the votes had already been cast before the assault took place, and Ryan was well aware that the House seat in question would remain under his control.

So courageous, Paul!  And we just love that serious expression of moral authority and disdain for indecorous behavior that you cultivate just for occasions like this.

ryan

Some people, by which I mean yours truly, Stewie Generis, figured all this would just help Gianforte solidify his base and prove his bona fides as a warrior against America’s greatest enemy, the media, and also validate his ticket on the Trump-Train from Montana. If a Jew reporter from some liberal rag gets his hair a little mussed up, well, what can we say – ya gotta break some eggs if ya wanna make an omelette.

Anyway, with the win in hand, Gianforte was ready to move on from all this. At his victory rally, he said to a laughing crowd,  “I shouldn’t have treated that reporter that way. I made a mistake.”

“Not in our minds,” someone shouted back.

minds

 

 

 

Trash heap at the top of the world

It’s that time of year again. Each May,  there is a brief window of opportunity, granted by the seasons and local conditions, when you can attempt a visit to the top of the world.

Climbing Mt. Everest has become one of the world’s most expensive, deadly, and destructive hobbies. Every year thousands of hopeful climbers and tourists descend on the area, many of whom really shouldn’t be there at all.

And, of course, a lot of them die. There have been about 300 or so deaths on Everest over the years since Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay first summited in 1953, and the Sherpas who guide the adventurers have died more often than anyone else. The last year without known fatalities on the mountain was 1977.

This year, the death toll has already reached ten, including an 85-year-old guy who was trying to reclaim his record as being the oldest to do it.

An industry has grown up around getting the clients to the summit one way or another, even if it means cutting some corners. The paying customers expect it, having put up tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars to be there.

In 2014,  Wang Jing, the 41 year old owner of a large Chinese outdoor clothing firm, defied a Sherpa strike by taking a helicopter to 21,000 feet, drawing some scorn from the mountaineering community.  She was trying to get to the “seven summits”, the highest point on each continent. The Sherpas were striking to redress many grievances they had about their treatment. This article covers the subject well.

The 1996 case of socialite Sandy Hill, who brought her cappuccino machine along,  got a lot of attention when Jon Krakauer wrote about her in Into Thin Air, his excellent account of the disaster on Everest she was part of.  He describes her as essentially being carried to the summit,

“the Sherpa, huffing and puffing loudly, was hauling the assertive New Yorker up the steep slope like a horse pulling a plow”

Hill became the focus of disdain and ridicule, a caricature of the rich and demanding westerner, and a self-promoter who put others in danger. She has her own version of the story, of course.

Everest is maxed out. It’s getting so there’s a traffic jam near the top, as people wait their turn to try for the summit.

everest line

A good deal of attention is at last being put on the environmental impact of all this activity.

This article talks about how people are leaving shit all over the place. Literally. It says

At base camp, visitors annually produce about 12,000 pounds of human waste each year, which often ends up in the waterways that nearby villages rely upon. “It’s getting notorious — people getting sick from water contaminated by dumping human waste,” Alton Byers, director of science and exploration at the US-based Mountain Institute, expained. “The place is getting covered with landfills, creating an environmental hazard for humans and animals.”

Here’s a good one from Outside Magazine with a lot more detail on the defecation problem. Gross, I know, but actually very interesting. Human laziness is the biggest part of the problem. It’s hard work removing stuff at those altitudes. Dead bodies are a particular challenge, and many have been there for decades.

ev-dead

Nepal is trying to address the trash situation with a rule that everyone has to pack out 18 pounds of trash. Literally tons of spent oxygen tanks have been hauled out, but trash generation is far outpacing trash removal.

Pictures from base camp:

garb1

garb2

 garb3

Is there any place on this planet that we haven’t yet ruined? Please keep it a secret if you know of one – maybe it can remain free from our intrusions for a little while longer.

Trillion dollar infrastructure plan

Remember that one? At the end of March, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao (a.k.a. Mrs. Mitch McConnell), assured us that the Trump administration would be unveiling its $1 Trillion dollar infrastructure plan in 2017.

chao

No details, though.

details.JPG

Welp, the Trump team has come up with its proposed budget, and guess what? There are $200 Billion in infrastructure cuts in it. Huh?

Yeah, it’s shocking. Or it would be if you’re still capable of being shocked by anything these idiots do. Given Trump’s limited attention span and minimal grasp of public policy, I think we can assume the budget reflects Steve Bannon’s wish list  as much as anything else.

This short video clip is kind of funny I think. Trump actually seems to be reading about his priorities for the first time when explaining them to some governors in February. He seems genuinely surprised by what’s written down for him. “Can you imagine that”, he marvels when reading about our $20 trillion debt.

In this budget, there are deep cuts for Medicaid and anti-poverty efforts, huge cuts for science and medical research, the complete elimination of 66 programs, a historic reduction in federal employees, a huge increase in military spending, and so on.

Larry Summers, former Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration and top economic adviser to President Obama, says the whole thing is built on an egregious accounting error.

Anyway, about that infrastructure program. Turns out the plan is for states and municipalities to sell off their “assets” – you know, bridges, airports, stuff like that –  to “unlock” their value.  Trump (or someone who has his ear) wants to spend $200 billion over 10 years to “incentivize” private, state and local spending on infrastructure. They sell their assets to private investors and the government pays them a bonus for doing it! Chao explains it this way: “You take the proceeds from the airport, from the sale of a government asset, and put it into financing infrastructure”.

Get it? Easy peasy.

They’ve figured out that privatizing public property turns out to create a better world.   Sell the airports to the Russians. The ports to the Chinese. The roads to the Kochs. What could go wrong?

A question of stamina

“She doesn’t have the stamina to be president.” That’s what Trump repeatedly said of Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail back in September.  Click on this for a smile:

Hillary replied,

“As soon as he travels to 112 countries and negotiates a peace deal, a cease fire, a release of dissidents, an opening of new opportunities in nations around the world, or even spends 11 hours testifying in front of a congressional committee he can talk to me about stamina.”

This week, the man-baby ventured out of Mar-a-Lago for his first trip abroad, a perfect opportunity to impress us with his superior stamina. Well, as with all things Trump, it didn’t quite work out that way.

In Trump’s inspirational speech to the Muslim world, he stupidly referred to “Islamic extremism” when he should have said “Islamist extremism”, a difference his predecessor Barack Obama understood well.

Obama refused to use the expression “Islamic terrorism” for very good reasons, and FoxNews and Trump never stopped criticizing him for it. “How can we address the problem if we can’t even name it?” they howled. He won’t say the words because he romanticizes Islam, they said.

In using this expression that he has used so often before, Trump thereby offended the entire Muslim world (again!), something which his predecessor tried not to do. It isn’t helpful, Obama often explained. It makes things worse.

Well, now Trump’s White House is back in damage control mode as usual. Why did Trump use this foolish phrase? Does he not understand the distinction between “Islamic”, which describes things related to the religion, and “Islamist”, which describes an often violent political movement? No, no, of course he understands that. All that criticism of Obama was months ago. Ancient history. You can’t seriously be bringing that up now, can you?!

Well, why then? Are you ready? He was “exhausted”!  Apparently he lacks stamina! Unbelievable.

After one lousy plane ride, in which he had an entire 747 to himself with a full Trump-size bed to sleep in.

On Sunday night, a senior White House official said Trump’s decision to say “Islamic extremism” instead of “Islamist extremism” as written in his prepared remarks was not intentional but the product of exhaustion brought on by the rigorous travel schedule.

 

“Just an exhausted guy,” the senior White House official said.

 

If it’s too much to expect him to not make an idiot out of himself, and further incite the already insane,  because flying in total luxury and serenity for 14 hours is too difficult, well why send him in the first place?

 

We could just let good ol’ Rex take care of it. He’s got some stamina, doesn’t he? At least the stamina of any other Secretary of State. And a lot more than that tired old Crooked Hillary, right?

 

Asked on Air Force One about the President’s fatigue, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters Monday, “He’s doing better than I am. And he’s got a few years on me.”

 

tillie-tired
“I’m Tired”

 

If you’re hoping that maybe someone in the Trump camp will say either that they were wrong to criticize Obama for trying to avoid intemperate language, or that they were wrong to be so strident in their attacks on Hillary’s stamina, well, we don’t have anything for you. It’s all old news, but thanks for the trip down memory lane, as Kellyanne Conway would say.

“Not a big media press access person”

That’s how Rex Tillerson, your Secretary of State, describes himself.  He was explaining his decision not to allow a pool reporter to travel with him on his trip to Asia in March.

Tillerson claimed the decision not to allow more reporters had to do with a desire to save money, saying the plane “flies faster, allows me to be more efficient” with fewer people on it.

That’s just science – everyone knows that planes fly faster with fewer reporters on them.

True to form, Tillerson yesterday held a press conference in Riyadh that excluded the U.S. press. No worries, though – he later provided a transcript of  the questions and answers given to the Saudi press.

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir, oversaw the process and stood alongside Tillerson throughout. He wanted to make sure that the free and independent press that Saudi Arabia is famous for had, you know, total discretion to ask and print what they want. I think that’s in the First Amendment to the Saudi Constitution, but I’ll have to double-check that.

jubeir

Transparency. That’s what the Trump administration is all about.

suadigreat

 

 

 

Bird in a gilded cage

I generally have no sympathy for Melania Trump. Like the other Trump wives, she’s made her choices and can now live with them. She actually seems to have things pretty much her way, though, so no tears for her in any case. Doesn’t have to go to that backwater, D.C., doesn’t have to live with the man-baby, shops and gets her hair done at will.

I’m not aware if she has any “interests” beyond that, but that’s probably because I pay as much attention to Melania as I do Pippa Middleton, whoever that is.  All I know about Pippa is that he or she is in today’s Google news feed, and has something to do with being “royal” or whatever. It’s therefore probably not fair for me to have too many opinions about either of them – though being on everyone’s radar does seem like part of their shtick.

I do think it’s strange that on the one or two occasions that Trump has returned to New York since inauguration, he has actually stayed at his golf club in New Jersey, rather than Trump Tower with his lovely wife. Saving the taxpayers money, he explains. By creating yet another security nightmare at yet another location. Well, I guess he knows what he’s doing.

This picture is a bit sad, though. Even I have to admit that.

bird in a gilded cage

We’re used to seeing The First Lady walking dutifully behind The First Man-Baby, but Jesus Christ! Can’t these effing Saudis find one person who will talk to her? Or walk next to her? Or look at her? Isn’t there some American diplomat somewhere that could make this a little easier on her? How about a little dab of multiculturalism for the visiting dignitaries?

No. The women must remain as invisible as possible in the Kingdom. This is achieved in part by refusing to look at them when the infidels bring them along.

For the evening’s entertainment, the man-baby took part in a male-only traditional sword dance. So much fun.

sword

I’m not clear on where Melania spent the evening. Comparing nail polish with some of the wives somewhere out of sight? Couldn’t say.

Melania seems to me to be a bird in a gilded cage. I don’t know why anyone would aspire to this life or envy anyone in her position. Unlike the Saudi wives, however, it’s a role she chose for herself.

Mazel tov, fegelah.

Donald of Arabia

Can’t wait to find out what kind of problems Trump will be causing for us and for himself on his first trip abroad. He’ll be visiting Saudi Arabia and Israel, and, of course, has put forward many nonsensical opinions about both in the past.

He is supposed to be giving an “inspirational” speech to the Saudis about moderate Islam. Last year, his Facebook page said, “Saudi Arabia wants women as slaves and to kill gays.”  And during a presidential debate, Trump said Saudis were “people that push gays off buildings” and “kill women and treat women horribly.”

As we have often been told in recent months, Trump is not “ideological”, but “transactional”. This is supposed to be a good thing for us because it frees him from the constraints of protocol and history, and allows him to exercise his purported greatest strength, that of master negotiator.  He’s a businessman, you see, not a politician. What a crock!

In fact , this “transactional” nonsense is just another way to say he has no principles, doesn’t really understand what he’s talking about from minute to minute, and certainly can’t be held to any past statements because he didn’t really mean them the way you thought and anyway they were just opening gambits in some fantastic negotiation he was conducting on our behalf.

Trump reverses course and contradicts himself so often that he ultimately takes all sides of every question. The beauty of this approach is that you can brag that you were “right” all along when whatever happens happens. It also helps him to speak in a weird kind of gibberish, never using complete sentences, and ignoring the usual subject-and-verb conventions of English language communication. He can rightly say that everyone misunderstood what he was really saying,  got it all wrong, and are criticizing him for political reasons and because they’re all losers.

Part of being “transactional” is to criticize every action and statement of your perceived enemies, the list of whom becomes longer every day. During the Obama administration, there was basically nothing that happened, big or small, that Trump didn’t find fault with. The simple explanation for this, of course, is that his “views” are just the parroting back of whatever he sees on FoxNews.

Anyway, when Obama went to Saudi Arabia in 2015 to attend the funeral of Saudi King Abdullah , Michelle Obama did not wear a headscarf. Many people applauded her for this, including both yours truly, Stewie Generis, and my cousin Screwie. There are limits to how far the First Family of the Free World should have to go to accept customs that are in opposition to our own values, and maybe we should be “leading” in this area by setting an example.

Of course,  citizen Trump was outraged by the First Lady’s “insult”. He was worried about creating enemies, a subject about which he is truly an expert. He tweeted,

trumptweet

Can’t wait to see Melania and Ivanka in head-scarves.

melania

 

ivanka

Screwie speaks: Multiculturalism

My cousin Screwie came over the other day with a couple of six-packs of Pabst Blue Ribbon to watch the Celtics get crushed by the Cavaliers. He was flipping through channels after the game and landed on an episode of “All in the Family”.

It was the one where they flashed back to the time Gloria, the budding flower-child daughter, first introduces Michael, her long-haired leftie boyfriend, to Archie, her old-school working-class father.  Archie and Michael (or “Meathead”) are left alone to get acquainted.

Archie: What kind of a name is Stivic?

Meathead: Huh?

A: Where you from?

M: Oh, uh, Chicago.

A: I mean what’s your nationality?

M: (A little baffled) I’m an American.

A: I mean, where are your people from?

M: They’re from Poland.

A: (Rolls eyes) That would make you Polish, then.

Screwie’s had three or four PBRs at this point and says. “See? See how far we’ve gone in the wrong direction? This is why I hate St. Patrick’s Day. And Columbus Day”.

“What are you babbling about?”, I politely inquire.

He explains that in 1971, forty-six short years ago, this joke was on Archie. He was unenlightened and bigoted, and wanted to impose some sort of negative stereotype on Michael for being “Polish” when Michael wasn’t Polish at all, but a proud American, indeed every bit the American that Archie was.

Archie’s impulse was to “other” the Meathead, to assert his own right as a “real” American to decide who else had the Bona Fides to join the club. This was the definition of small-mindedness at the time – the opposite of what it meant to be “progressive”. Archie didn’t understand that everyone in this country (except the indigenous peoples, the “real” Americans) was an immigrant or the child of immigrants, all aspiring to be “American”. The audience roared. Archie was an idiot.

So I say, OK cousin, but what does this have to do with St. Patrick or Columbus?

Screwie says, “Look at this recent St. Patrick’s Day parade we just had. It was the usual cast of characters from Southie, having their one big moment to assert their “superiority” by keeping others out, namely gay people. None of them were “Irish”, any more than the Meathead was “Polish”. They were all Americans, the same as you, me, Archie, and Meathead. I’ll bet you none of them has ever even been to Ireland.” Even the Boston Globe writes, “The St. Patrick’s Day parade is the embarrassment that never goes away.”

“Same with Columbus Day. Columbus stumbled onto the “new world” while trying to do something else entirely, and ‘discovered’ a continent of people who were doing just fine for ten thousand years without him. And now all the “Italians” here want to have a parade. But they’re not “Italian”, they’re American.

And their antecedents, like the Irish, Polish, and all other immigrants before them, were desperately trying to scrape a few cents together to leave whatever hell-hole they were living in to come here and be ‘Americans’. Only generations later does that old country become something to hang your hat on and brag about, no matter how horrible it really was. And how horrible would it have to be for you to want to escape it without any money, prospects, English language skills, or anything else? Pretty bad.”

“Huh”, I reply, incisively.

But now Screwie is on a roll. “The problem is this crazy idea that’s taken root called ‘Multicuturalism’. The old idea of accepting the ‘tired poor huddled masses yearning to be free’ has morphed into ‘bring all your crazy shit over here and pretend you’re still in Beirut or Guadalajara or Mogadishu or wherever.’ Don’t bother learning English or Baseball or anything else – we’ll just accommodate you no matter what because that’s just how ‘progressive’ we are. Never mind that if you keep doing what you were doing over there, pretty soon life for you will be the same over here.”

“The very thing we saw as regressive and bigoted in Archie Bunker is the thing we now celebrate – no one wants to be just an ‘American’ now like Meathead and all the other enlightened people of 1971 did.”

Screwie is an organized thinker, and likes to make lists to clarify his points. The subject of multiculturalism is no exception, and he forges ahead, opening yet another PBR.

He says,
“1) Multiculturalism is an American obsession – no one else cares about it or thinks it’s a good idea. That’s because we’re the only country founded on the principle that everyone is welcome to jump into our melting pot. It makes a big stew called ‘American culture’ from all the ingredients brought here from everywhere else. Lately, we’ve forgotten about the melting pot and have become a Tapas place, where everyone has their own identity and ‘culture’, and ‘American’ culture, if it exists, is something to scorn.

2) It’s a one-way street. When I travel to Malaysia for business, I first read “Culture Shock – Malaysia”, because I don’t want to offend anyone. When in Rome, I try to do as the Romans do.  I learn that in Malaysia you don’t shake a woman’s hand when we meet in the office, because they’re Muslims and it’s not cool. When our diplomats travel to the Arabian peninsula, the women wear head-scarves to be respectful of their culture.

But when the Malaysians or Saudis come here, the women don’t shake my hand here either (and their men don’t shake the hand of the women here, even the CEOs), and their women still wear the veil here.  No one is reading “Culture Shock – America” when they come here, hoping to fit in. We defer to their ‘culture’ when we are there, and we defer to it when they are here. No one defers to American culture.

3) Multiculturalism marginalizes and even denies American culture, even though it pervades the world. When the Iranians refer to the ‘Great Satan’, they are not talking about our politicians or our foreign policy or our Christians and Jews. They are talking about American ‘culture’, that siren song of temptation – the movies and music, sexual freedom, gender equality, consumerism, pornography, hedonism, atheism, etc. etc. All of it. It threatens them and their culture (at least they worry that it does). I’m not saying American culture is better than anyone else’s or even that it’s good. I’m saying it exists, but that when we elevate and aspire to ‘multiculturalism’, we are denying it.

4) It re-enforces identity politics and grievances and gives old prejudices sustenance. That’s what Archie was doing with Meathead, and we used to understand it as a bad thing.

Remember that news story in Cambridge the other day? The one about the high school kids on the bus that were acting up and playing their music way too loud and annoying the other passengers? They were kids being kids and being inconsiderate and annoying, as kids will be. The driver tells them to pipe down, and that’s when the story becomes ‘news’.

See the driver was Whatever-White-American and the kids were African-American. So a seventeen year old girl starts in on how this is a ‘micro-aggression’ and racism because in her ‘culture’, music and sound and blah blah blah.  Not too long ago, the kids would have said “sorry” or “fuck off, old man” or whatever, but insisting that their right to annoy others is based in their ‘culture’? And that the driver is a racist? This is what they’re now taught in school. Wow.

5) Multiculturalism perpetuates and accentuates what divides us at the expense of what unites us. Another example from school: the kids have access to video equipment so they can create stuff to be shown on their own little TV station, which other citizens of Cambridge can watch. Kinda cool.

So I’m watching this perfectly charming piece made by a girl about her neighborhood and family and what she likes about school, etc. And she says, ‘On my street, there are about half American families and half Muslim families’.  Holy shit, I think. This is a problem.

A couple of months later, the Boston Marathon bombing happened.  A little punk named Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, along with his older brother, did the crime. He went to the same high school as the video-maker girl, where he was given a college scholarship by his Cambridge neighbors, wrestled on the school team, smoked some dope, and appeared to be like any other kid. He lived just a couple of streets over from the girl who made the video in which the distinction between Americans and Muslims was casually and innocently asserted, and not corrected or edited out by any teacher. You do the math.

6) It weakens our position in foreign policy matters when our own people are hyphenated. I don’t think we’ll be going to war with Ireland any time soon, though with President Crazy-pants you never know. But if we do, should we send our Irish-American troops?  Or just our British-American ones?

Remember the Japanese internment after Pearl Harbor? It is now recognized as one of the worst things we ever did – rounding up Americans with Japanese antecedents because we couldn’t trust them to be ‘Americans’. Just when we got to the point where we realized that mistake, we are now reversing direction and glorifying and encouraging everyone to maintain their real ‘identity’, i.e membership in some group that is not ‘American’.

7) People no longer come here to be ‘American’. They come here to remain what they were, but with political stability, economic opportunity, and social equality. This cannot sustain. And it’s un-American, There. I said it.

8) If we insist on everyone’s right to maintain their own culture, we are ignoring the many areas of conflict between what we want our culture to be and what you insist yours is. Should we encourage ‘culture’ hostile to homosexuality or women’s rights? Or one that includes genital mutilation, polygamy, or honor killing? We say we want to honor the other cultures, but some other cultures are built on what we abhor, and some are downright hostile to ‘American’ culture. See point 2 above.”

By this time my head is spinning. Screwie’s a lot smarter than I am, so I never just dismiss what he rants about. But after all those PBRs, I’m not sure he really means it all, and he’s starting to slur his words a little. I figured it was time to kick him out.

Anyway, it was time to fix dinner for my house-mates, who are proud Feline-Americans.

cats

Ransomware and Bitcoin

Bitcoin is a “cryptocurrency” invented in 2009. It is an alternative to hard currency that exists only in the form of computer data stored in digital “wallets” that can be exchanged for goods and services (i.e. transferred to someone else’s wallet) with any party that accepts it as a form of payment.

Bitcoin has gained significant traction and acceptance in the last few years, and given rise to hundreds of competitors, collectively known as “altcoin”. Bitcoin is now legal in most countries, with these exceptions: Ecuador, Bangladesh, Bolivia & Kyrgyzstan.

Cryptocurrency has the advantages of anonymity, speed, and de-centralized control. It is very attractive to criminals as a great new way to launder money and avoid prosecution.

The value of a Bitcoin fluctuates and many have speculated in the currency, most notably the Winkelvoss twins, who have by far the largest hoard, and who recently filed S.E.C. papers to create an Exchange Traded Fund in Bitcoin, with an initial offering of $100 million.  The S.E.C denied the offering, giving Bitcoin and the Winkelvii a major headache. They said they thought it was too susceptible to fraud because of the unregulated nature of Bitcoin.

wink

The value of a Bitcoin today is $1820, up from $75 less than four years ago. Gains in the value of Bitcoin holdings are taxed in the U.S. like any other Capital Gain.

bitcoin

The huge “ransomware” attacks experienced in over 150 countries this week, in which victims had all the files on their computers encrypted by attackers, relied on Bitcoin for payment. The hospitals, utilities, government offices, and all kinds of other industries that were victimized could not use their computer systems until they paid a ransom in Bitcoin.

Some people think the only reason Bitcoin has any value at all is its use in criminal activity. From the link:

If we could flip a switch and eliminate all illegal uses of Bitcoin, there would be nothing left of the cybercurrency.

It may be possible to eventually track down the source of the attacks by following the money, as some tracing of transactions is possible, but it seems unlikely that this will result in the prosecution or even identification of particular individuals.

This week’s ransomware code had three hard-coded bitcoin wallets specified that would receive payments.  An up-to-the minute record of Bitcoin transactions in the three accounts can be found on Twitter by following @actual_ransom. So far, not all that much has been paid into these accounts – less than $85,000 as of this morning. It’s not yet clear whether anyone who has paid the ransom has gotten their files back.

The Guardian had a nice explanation of the whole phenomenon this week, so to learn some more background, check it out.

The GOML summary: Bitcoin is a great innovation for criminals and Winkelvii.

 

Partisanship will prevail

This FiveThirtyEight article breaks down the three biggest scandals of the last 50 years to try to illuminate what might happen with the Trump presidency. The article stops short of saying it, but the take-away is that party loyalty will save even this toxic clown. Those of us who believe that Trump is clearly unfit for office and has already committed impeachable offenses, and who are wondering why in the world Republicans can’t see this, will have no satisfaction.

The article analyzes the Watergate, Iran/Contra and Lewinsky scandals, and points out that virtually every step of the way, only a handful of lawmakers of the incumbent’s party ever voted against him, and that those few who did were “centrists”, an obsolete designation in today’s G.O.P.

The piece notes that,

Even as Nixon aides resigned and the Watergate controversy grew around the president in 1973, many congressional Republicans were arguing that the investigations of the president were overly aggressive. Two future GOP presidents, George H.W. Bush (then chairman of the Republican National Committee) and Reagan (then governor of California), called Nixon and assured him that he could get through the scandal.

Reagan counseled Nixon to hang on because “this too shall pass”.

Even after the Saturday Night Massacre, which many see as the fatal blow for Nixon’s presidency, Republicans stood by him:

The House Judiciary Committee held a series of votes about recommending Nixon’s impeachment in July 1974. All 21 committee Democrats, and six committee Republicans, voted for the first article of impeachment, which essentially accused Nixon of obstructing the investigation of the Watergate break-in. The other 11 Republicans voted against that article. There were three articles of impeachment against Nixon. Nineteen Democrats voted for all three articles of impeachment. Just one Republican did. A majority of the Republicans on the committee, 10 of the 17, voted against all three articles.

Note that the committee consisted of 21 Democrats and 17 Republicans, and that Democrats controlled the House, unlike today, and only a simple majority is required to send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. Today’s House is controlled by Republicans, 246-187.

house

What finally killed Nixon was that there were a handful of principled Republican Senators who were willing to do the right thing, notably Howard Baker, the top Republican of the three on the Senate Watergate Committee. Even he let party loyalty cloud his judgement, as he let his aides discuss progress with the Nixon White House.

The Senate at the time of Watergate was controlled by Democrats 56-42. A two thirds vote in the Senate is needed for impeachment, so the task at hand wasn’t as difficult as it is today, where Republicans control the Senate 54-44-2 (2 independents).

But today’s political landscape is completely different than those good old days of simple partisan divisions. Cable news, the internet, gerrymandering, Dark Money, Citizen’s United, and many other factors have produced a state of hyper-partisanship which really has little resemblance to the Watergate era.

This Wapo article, entitled “Only Republicans can stop Trump right now. History suggests they won’t.” says,

Recent history also justifies fears that Republicans will not stand up to Trump. Flake, McCain, Sasse and other senators have all clashed publicly with the president before. But those are just words, and talk is cheap. With the occasional exception when Republicans have been able to spare one or two votes, GOP senators have marched in lockstep with the Trump White House. McCain in particular has continued his years-long pattern of tut-tutting Republican leaders and then voting with his party anyway.

If Flake, McCain and others want to show us they are truly troubled, then they will need to do more than put out a statement. They need to join with Democrats and refuse to vote for a new FBI director (and perhaps even other Trump appointees or legislation) until a special prosecutor is appointed. Nothing short of that is acceptable.

It’s fun to watch Trump’s “disapproval” ratings go up each week and his “approval” ratings go down, but we need to remember (and the man-baby is constantly reminding us) that these numbers do not matter and that those who predicted the election based on such numbers were completely embarrassed.

What matters is that Trump’s approval rating among those who voted for him has not changed at all. It’s holding steady at 88% and will edge up whenever he does something “big”.

What matters is that the electoral map of Trump’s victory remains the same.

county

Obstruction of Justice + Treason = ?

A few days ago, the President of the United States admitted to the crime of Obstruction of Justice on national television. In an interview, he told NBC’s Lester Holt that he fired the Director of the F.B.I., James Comey, because he was frustrated by the investigation into Russian meddling in the election, which he said wasn’t real but rather made up by Democrats who lost an election they should have won.

This is Obstruction of Justice, an impeachable offense.

He left out the part about how it was the very same Comey’s timely revelations about the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails that tipped the scales of the election. It’s hard to remember now, but the reason everyone was so upset about which email account Clinton used was that she might reveal classified information to our nation’s enemies, e.g. Russia. Even though no such information was revealed, Trump repeatedly called for Clinton to be “locked up” for her imagined crimes.

But with Trump, Obstruction of Justice is like everything else. Nothing. Republicans in Congress said he had a right to fire whoever he wants (not if it’s Obstruction, he doesn’t), that it’s all smoke and no fire, and so on.

Only four days ago, I wrote,

By next week it will all be forgotten, replaced in the “news” by stories about the selection of the new F.B.I. director, who, by the way, will certainly be loyal to Trump. Or by some other craziness, maybe the new investigation into voter fraud, led by a proponent of Voter ID laws. Or more likely by something we just can’t see coming right now. Your assignment: come back here in a week and add a comment about what it turned out to be!

Well, don’t bother. It didn’t take a week and we already have the answer. Yesterday, we learned that the President revealed highly classified information to the Russians in that meeting that only the Russian news agency was allowed to cover. He was bragging to the Russians about all the “great intel” he gets every day (Really? Who’d have imagined?). The WaPo article says,

The information the president relayed had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government, officials said.

The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia, and officials said Trump’s decision to do so endangers cooperation from an ally that has access to the inner workings of the Islamic State. After Trump’s meeting, senior White House officials took steps to contain the damage, placing calls to the CIA and the National Security Agency.

This is Treason, also an impeachable offense.

To summarize, Trump wanted to lock up Crooked Hillary Clinton because she couldn’t be trusted to keep our secrets out of Russian hands, and applauded James Comey for revealing that the F.B.I. was investigating her handling of emails, an investigation which ultimately resulted in nothing.

In a fit of petulance, he then fired Comey for investigating the Russian hacking of the very emails we’re talking about, because it might be revealed that his campaign staff colluded with the Russians. Such a firing is unjustified, improper, and completely without precedent.

He then disclosed highly classified information directly to our enemies on his own. Personally. To the Russians. While standing in the Oval Office. With the Russian State News Agency present.

Does any of this matter to the “No Regerts” crowd? Nah. As everyone knows, Trump is Draining the Swamp and Making America Great Again. Lock Her Up. That’s what matters. When his current 88% approval rating with those who voted for him starts to drop, then maybe something will be done about all this. But there’s apparently nothing that could ever have that effect, so don’t hold your breath.

Obstruction of Justice + Treason = Nothing.

hat3

The internet is forever

We mentioned it as kind of a throwaway at the end of this post the other day, but it actually merits a lot more attention: all of Trump’s campaign promises have been deleted from his website, where they had been prominently featured since before the election.

The website still invites you to buy merchandise and sign up to join his “movement”, but it’s no longer clear exactly what that movement stands for. Other than firing people, of course.

merch

Since nothing is ever really deleted from the internet, his nutty campaign promises can still be found elsewhere, in archives, mirrors and the like. Although the man-baby would like us to forget all about it, we still have what we need to remember. Not that anyone was really going to hold him to any of this nonsense to begin with.

He deleted the call for a ban on Muslims entering the country “until we figure out what the Hell is going on”. That’s been a mainstay of the “movement” since 2015.

He deleted the promise that a southern border wall would be built and that Mexico would pay for it. That one was huge.

His boasting about his “very good” economic speech is gone.

His campaign speech to immediately repeal and replace Obamacare is gone. That’s the one where he said,  “No one even read the 2,700-page bill”, and promised to convene a special session of congress to get it done:

When we win on November 8th, and elect a Republican Congress, we will be able to immediately repeal and replace Obamacare. I will ask Congress to convene a special session.

“Donald J. Trump’s New Deal For Black America” is also gone. That’s the one that had a “10-point plan for urban renewal”, including:

3. Equal Justice Under the Law. We will apply the law fairly, equally and without prejudice. There will be only one set of rules – not a two-tiered system of justice. Equal justice also means the same rules for Wall Street.

The “America First Energy Plan” is gone. That’s the one where he promises,

“We’re going to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement and stop all payments of U.S. tax dollars to U.N. global warming programs.”

The “Drain the swamp” plan is gone. That’s where he promised to propose a Constitutional Amendment to set up term limits on members of Congress.

It goes on and on. You can read more about it here.

The thing that stays on the site, though, is the opportunity to contribute to the “movement” because “together, we are re-building our nation”.

And if you want to hear more about the inspiring story of the people that made the “Make America Great Again” hats, they’ve got you covered.

I’m thinking maybe it’s time for a GOML “movement” hat, as well, but I’m having trouble figuring out the best slogan. Right now, I’m leaning towards this one:

hat3

It’s been said that there are three captions that you could apply to any cartoon in the New Yorker that would make it funny in cases where you don’t get the original joke. Maybe one of them would make a good hat for our new GOML “movement”:

hat2

hat3

hat

Do you have another idea? Let’s hear it.

A Hard Rain’s a-Gonna Fall

It was 54 years ago this week that a little-known folk singer named Bob Dylan told the most important figure in prime time television, Ed Sullivan, to take a hike.

In May of 1963, Dylan had a small following based on playing clubs around Greenwich Village and the release of his first album a year before, called “Bob Dylan”, which contained only two original songs. His second album, “The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan”, which would change  everything, had not come out yet.

freewheelin

Freeweheelin’ had a bunch of  soon-to-be-classic Dylan compositions on it, including “Blowin’ in the Wind”, “Girl from the North Country”, “Masters of War”, “A Hard Rain’s a-Gonna Fall”, and “Don’t Think Twice, It’s All Right”.

Before Freewheelin’ dropped, Dylan was like a lot of other people struggling to be heard. Unlike almost everyone else, though, he got a huge break in the form of an invitation to appear on the Ed Sullivan Show, which at that time was the biggest thing anyone could hope for. It was the country’s highest rated variety show – a guarantee of a huge national audience.

But on May 12, Dylan walked off the show because network censors rejected the song he planned on performing, “Talkin’ John Birch Paranoid Blues”. The song lampooned the loony right for its tendency to see a “Communist” everywhere they looked, and the network worried they’d be sued because the song equated the views of the Birchers with those of Hitler.

They asked Dylan to choose a different song and he told them to choose a different singer.

As you may know, The John Birch Society was co-founded by Fred C. Koch, the father of David and Charles Koch, who have been doing their best for some time now to ruin this country with their Dark Money.

An excerpt from Amazon’s description of “Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right”, by Jane Mayer:

Why is America living in an age of profound economic inequality? Why, despite the desperate need to address climate change, have even modest environmental efforts been defeated again and again? Why have protections for employees been decimated? Why do hedge-fund billionaires pay a far lower tax rate than middle-class workers?
     The conventional answer is that a popular uprising against “big government” led to the ascendancy of a broad-based conservative movement. But as Jane Mayer shows in this powerful, meticulously reported history, a network of exceedingly wealthy people with extreme libertarian views bankrolled a systematic, step-by-step plan to fundamentally alter the American political system. 
     The network has brought together some of the richest people on the planet. Their core beliefs—that taxes are a form of tyranny; that government oversight of business is an assault on freedom—are sincerely held. But these beliefs also advance their personal and corporate interests: Many of their companies have run afoul of federal pollution, worker safety, securities, and tax laws.
     The chief figures in the network are Charles and David Koch, whose father made his fortune in part by building oil refineries in Stalin’s Russia and Hitler’s Germany. The patriarch later was a founding member of the John Birch Society, whose politics were so radical it believed Dwight Eisenhower was a communist. The brothers were schooled in a political philosophy that asserted the only role of government is to provide security and to enforce property rights. 

The Kochs have changed the face of Congress by bankrolling candidates that can be relied upon to support their views, and by attacking their opponents with all manner of fake news, made-up scandals, and assorted dirty tricks.

One of the beneficiaries of the Koch largess has been Trey Gowdy, a partisan hack from South Carolina, who has been nicknamed “Hillary Slayer” for his absurd and relentless persecution of Hillary Clinton when he was chairman of the Benghazi hearings, a two-year long waste of the taxpayers’ money. His behavior more closely resembled that of a demented piranha than a U.S. Congressman.

pir1

Guess who Trump’s first choice for the next Director of the F.B.I. is?

trey1 Trey Gowdy

Just when you think Trump can’t top himself, he surprises you. At least this time we don’t have to fret about whether Trump will again be so clueless as to ask Gowdy for his loyalty. Everyone already knows the answer to that one.  And it’s another big day for the sons of the Birchers – the Kochs are smiling about this.

As Dylan said all those years ago, “A Hard Rain’s a-Gonna Fall.”

hardrain

“Who would do this?”

Remember last June when Bill Clinton met privately for a couple of minutes on a plane in Phoenix with Attorney General Loretta Lynch after realizing they were both on the same tarmac? Remember what a scandal it was?

lynch

The House Benghazi Committee was going to release its report on how Hillary Clinton had personally murdered thousands of people (or maybe that she had personally drowned thousands of puppies – I don’t really remember whatever it was supposed to be about, because it was all made-up nonsense), and the Justice Department was conducting an investigation of her email server.

The “optics” of Bill Clinton speaking privately to the AG confirmed that the independence of the Justice Department was “compromised”, according to Donald Trump, FoxNews, and virtually all Republicans, who all howled about “Crooked Hillary” for days.  It was a significant blow to her campaign.

Trump said to conservative talk show host Mike Gallagher, “It was terrible.  It was really a sneak. You see a thing like this and, even in terms of judgment, how bad of judgment is it for him or for her to do this? Who would do this?”

Republican John Cornyn called for a “Special Counsel” to take over the email investigation, reading an impassioned speech about this corruption into the Congressional Record.

Judicial Watch, a conservative legal watchdog group that has sued for access to records pertaining to Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while leading the State Department, is asking for the Justice Department’s inspector general to investigate the meeting. They said:

“Attorney General Lynch’s meeting with President Clinton creates the appearance of a violation of law, ethical standards and good judgment. Attorney General Lynch’s decision to breach the well-defined ethical standards of the Department of Justice and the American legal profession is an outrageous abuse of the public’s trust. Her conduct and statements undermine confidence in her ability to objectively investigate and prosecute possible violations of law associated with President Clinton and Secretary Clinton.”

Well, less than a year has passed, and all talk of “the appearance of violation of law”,  “ethical standards”, “abuse of the public trust”, and “Who would do this?” has mysteriously ceased.

Trump has no problem calling in the head of the F.B.I. to an unprecedented private dinner while the Bureau was conducting an investigation of his election, and demanding his loyalty. Who would do this?

And the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions,  has demonstrated more than just the “appearance” of being compromised. He had recused himself from the Russia investigation because of his own meetings with Russians during the campaign (which he then lied about, under oath). In violation of this recusal, he recommended that Trump fire the head of the F.B.I. (apparently after Trump requested him to do this). This recommendation was the first of four stories about why Trump fired Jim Comey.

Trump soon enough gave other explanations through his surrogates, finally throwing them all under the bus, as usual, with his own interview, in which he said he had been thinking about firing Comey for a long time, because the Russia/Trump connection was fake news made up by Democrats. He thereby confessed to obstruction of justice.

He also said that he didn’t see why asking for Comey’s loyalty “would have been a bad question to ask”, thereby revealing once again that he doesn’t understand that he is not Emperor or King or Führer, but merely President.

But according to Republicans across the land, it’s all smoke and no fire. Ya gotta love their consistency, right?

You know what? I don’t even care about Trump and his lies and craziness anymore. I mean, of course I “care”, because he just might get us all killed while trying to distract us, but I don’t care about these stories – it’s all more evidence of the obvious. Trump is unfit to be president, and may well be deranged. It’s all been amply demonstrated many times before.

And I don’t care because no one else cares and therefore nothing will come of it and it doesn’t matter. Everyone already knows the Russians meddled. Everyone already knows Trump benefited and is happy about it. Everyone already knows he’s unfit for the job.

I admit I’m befuddled about why the Republican Congress keeps ignoring all these golden opportunities to get rid of this toxic clown. I mean they’d still have everything they want with Pence, no? But I guess they have their reasons.

The thing that keeps gnawing at me, though, is how quickly the Republicans cast aside their own words and their own alleged principles. How they go on as if there is no record of what they’ve said and the positions they’ve taken. Is there no one other than John McCain and, occasionally Lindsay Graham, to push back? Not that they don’t have their own motives, I’m sure, quite unrelated to “integrity”.

Why do people who should know better stand by this crazy clown so predictably?

Who would do this?

 

Trump has a different account of it

As always.

There is never a case where someone gives an account of a meeting or discussion with Trump that reflects negatively on him that Trump doesn’t give a completely opposite account of it. Essentially, he constantly is calling everyone else a liar. And even if you know he always does it, it still puts you in the position of playing, “Who you gonna believe: it’s he said, she said”. The actual truth is no longer clear. It’s now a question of belief.

One week after Trump became president,  he summoned James Comey to a private dinner with him. After some small talk, Trump asked Comey if he would “pledge his loyalty to him”.  Wow. Is this something any other president, even Nixon, would ever do? A führer, maybe, but not a president. The F.B.I., as everyone knows, is supposed to be independent and fair, and take pride in that. In fact, if anyone else was asking, you’d be tempted to regard it as a trick question, meant to test your integrity.

trump&comey

According to the NYT, Comey “declined to make that pledge. Instead, Mr. Comey has recounted to others that he told Mr. Trump that he would always be honest with him, but that he was not “reliable” in the conventional political sense.” They went back and forth on this point with Trump finally extracting a pledge of “honest loyalty”.

Trump, as always, has a different account of the dinner. Interviewed on NBC yesterday, he  said Comey requested the dinner and the subject of loyalty never came up. Comey’s apparently a liar. The NYT article goes on,

Comey described details of his refusal to pledge his loyalty to Mr. Trump to several people close to him on the condition that they not discuss it publicly while he was F.B.I. director. But now that Mr. Comey has been fired, they felt free to discuss it on the condition of anonymity.

Mr. Comey’s associates said that the new president requested the dinner he described, and said that he was wary about attending because he did not want to appear too chummy with Mr. Trump, especially amid the Russia investigation. But Mr. Comey went because he did not believe he could turn down a meeting with the new president.

Who you gonna believe?

Anyway, none of it matters. With Trump, it never does. Consider:

1. By next week it will all be forgotten, replaced in the “news” by stories about the selection of the new F.B.I. director, who, by the way, will certainly be loyal to Trump. Or by some other craziness, maybe the new investigation into voter fraud, led by a proponent of Voter ID laws. Or more likely by something we just can’t see coming right now. Your assignment: come back here in a week and add a comment about what it turned out to be!

2. Trump’s supporters out there in Trumpland DO NOT CARE. Last night, amidst all the Comey coverage, tons of Trump voters in state after state were interviewed about Comey and the Russia investigation. They asked the question, “If it turns out that the President colluded with the Russians during the campaign, does it change your view of him?” Guess what they all answered? Every one of them.

These are the people that Republican Congressmen have to please in order to keep their jobs, and if these people don’t care, Congress doesn’t care. If Congress doesn’t care, the “media” is howling in the hurricane, and it’s all further evidence that they are the enemy of the American people.

 

Hunkering down or flipping us off?

It’s hard to know how to describe Trump’s behavior these days. Is he in a defensive crouch? Or is he Thor,  atop a mountain, laughing and hurling thunderbolts down on his enemies?

thor

A couple of months ago, we were all outraged when reporters from the New York Times, CNN, and others were excluded from a White House press briefing. It came on the heels of one of the man-baby’s regular episodes of “lashing out”, in that case against his “unfair” treatment in the media.

At the time, Dean Baquet, executive editor at the NYT,  said that “nothing like this has ever happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple administrations of different parties.” The Wall Street Journal was allowed in, but said they hadn’t known about the exclusions, and “had we known at the time, we would not have participated, and we will not participate in such closed briefings in the future.”

In other words, Trump crossed a line that no other president had ever come near.  And, of course, he was unrepentant, shrugged it all off, and ignored the howls from critics, who, after all, he had already identified as the enemy of the American people.

The precedent was set, and yesterday he upped the ante. It was unfortunate timing, coming on the heels of the shocking firing of F.B.I. director James Comey, but Trump entertained Russian officials at the white House, including Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, Moscow’s ambassador to the United States.

Not wanting to answer any potentially embarrassing questions, Trump decided to exclude all American media, even FoxNews, and allow only the Russian media in to record the event. To repeat: the event was covered by the Russian state-controlled media, while the  independent American media was shut out.

russians

TASS photograph

I’m pretty sure there is now nothing Trump could do that would cause his supporters to demand that he follow any of the conventions of the presidency, or of a democracy for that matter.

It’s as if the country is now divided not between Republicans and Democrats, or Liberals and Conservatives, but between two opposing tribes who are locked in an all-out battle for supremacy. On the one hand, you have people who believe in the rule of law, the tripartite system of checks and balances, a free press, minority rights, and a government working for the benefit of all its citizens.

On the other, you have people who don’t care about any of that, or about conflicts of interest, or officials using their power for self-enrichment, or to benefit the few at the expense of the many. They only want to punish the other side, even if it means their own lives will be diminished as their “leaders”  enjoy the spoils. Every abandonment of normal behavior or slap in the face to a perceived enemy is fully justified and a triumph.

The two sides can no longer agree on facts, or even history.

Until very recently, just months ago in fact, Americans understood their enemy to be the totalitarian or authoritarian governments around the world, with the Russians at the head of the line, and were united in our struggle to protect the “American Way”.  But now, overnight, our government has aligned with the Russians and has identified the enemy as the American system itself, and those who want to protect it.

And the truly befuddling thing about it is that half the American people seem to be cheering it.

In related news, this week all of  Trump’s campaign statements have quietly been removed from his web site. You can still buy his merch there, though.

merch

Cox and Comey

Last night, our unhinged president fired the head of the F.B.I., James Comey, allegedly for his handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails, something Trump had often praised Comey about even in the very recent past. Is there anyone who actually believes this nonsense?

Comey is currently leading an investigation into the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with Russian hackers, and everyone understands that the reason he was fired was to put a chill on that investigation.

It’s pretty funny that Trump was “acting on the advice” of the Justice Department, i.e. on Attorney General Jeff Sessions, one of the very Trump Campaign people who apparently colluded with the Russians (and then lied about it under oath). You may not remember that connection, because the whole “Obama tapped my wires” thing blew it right off the internet, and therefore off of all other news sources, as well.

The best part is the short letter Trump sent to Comey telling him he was gone. It contains just three paragraphs, the second of which is truly bizarre:

While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgement of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau. 

Huh?

Anyway, the entire world immediately saw the parallel here to the Saturday Night Massacre, in which Richard Nixon fired special prosecutor Archibald Cox, who was  leading the Watergate investigation. This led to the resignations of Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus on October 20, 1973. This was the turning point for the Nixon Presidency and he resigned from office some months later, when he saw his impeachment was certain.

The hashtag #TuesdayNightMassacre blew up on social media with many people exulting that this was certainly the beginning of the end for the man-baby, and that, like Nixon, he would ultimately be on the road to impeachment.

trump-nixon

Not so fast, kids.

There is a huge difference between the Saturday Night Massacre and the Tuesday Night Massacre, and it is one that means Trump will not be impeached. Not until after 2018, anyway. At the time of the Cox firing, the Democrats controlled the House of Representatives.

Impeachment happens only if a simple majority of the House votes for “Articles of Impeachment”. And then a two-thirds majority of the Senate must vote for impeachment, after hearings presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. All of these offices are controlled by Republicans, and all their constituencies love Trump.

A second somewhat less important difference is that, back then, there were also a handful of Republicans who understood that our country and the rule of law are, in fact, more important that partisan politics. That’s not the case today. Virtually every Republican congressman who was asked about the firing last night, said something like it was “time for a change” or “the F.B.I. head serves at the pleasure of the President.”

Even the ones that have in the past demonstrated some independence, like Maine’s Senator Susan Collins, who said,

“The Justice Department was really understaffed for a long time, it took a while for the attorney general to be confirmed and his deputy was just confirmed I believe a week or so ago, and it’s the deputy who is a career prosecutor who had been designated to do the analysis so the FBI director’s actions and came up with the recommendation.

“The president did not fire the entire FBI. He fired the director of the FBI. And any suggestion that this is somehow going to stop the FBI’s investigation of the attempts by the Russians to influence the elections last fall is really patently absurd. This is just one person, it’s the director, the investigation is going forward both at the FBI and in the Senate Intel Committee in a bipartisan way. SO I don’t think there’s any link at all.”

But, on the bright side, assuming there is anything left to salvage of our government two years from now, and assuming Democrats can regain the House, Trump’s impeachment is now inevitable. Big assumptions.

The mid-term elections are more important now than ever before. I hope all the Bernie voters and Jill Stein voters can grasp all this and do the right thing.

 

Why no one is reading this

Spoiler Alert: it’s not because the content is less than brilliant 😉

Yesterday, I had an errand to do which required me to take a short subway ride on the Red Line during the morning rush. I went from Harvard to Charles/M.G.H. – in other words from one of the world’s most elite institutions to another, stopping at a third (M.I.T.) on the way.

I started thinking that more than a few people in the car were certainly involved in solving the problems of the present, and also predicting and solving the problems of the future. And then I thought about what a lousy job of predicting things the “futurists” have done in the past.

The futurists of the 1950’s completely whiffed on so many of the things they figured we’d have by now: flying cars made out of Saran-Wrap, elegant dinners consisting of a steak pill and a potato pill and a vintage wine pill, jet-packs we’d strap on for a short trip, a geodesic dome over the city ensuring clean air and perfect climate for all, and a million other things. But, OK, it was the 1950’s – of course they were wrong. Everyone then thought DDT, radium-dial watches, and a carton of Lucky Strikes would make life better for everyone, so you couldn’t really expect much accuracy from their predictions.

But the people who were predicting how the future would be just ten years ago completely missed the most important, pervasive, and life changing development of all: the “smart phone”.  On my brief subway ride, there were, I don’t know, maybe 150-200 people in the car I rode in, give or take.  Not one was reading a book or (gasp!) a newspaper, and not one was just looking blankly at nothing or taking a nap. Every one of them was absorbed in viewing a 5″ screen one foot from  their face.  Every. Single. Person.

phones

Get Off My Lawn is not very phone-friendly. Yes, you can read it on your phone and I know some of you do – but the format is different from what you’d see on a laptop or desktop. You may not see the “categories” links and you may not see the list of day-by day entries. There’s not much opportunity to select another article if you want to keep reading.

It’s rare for anyone to follow any of the links included in many GOML pieces. Clicking on links while using a phone is more cumbersome, and would take you to a different site from which it might not be that easy to return, rather just opening another tab or window as would happen on a desktop screen. And if you like what you’re reading, you are much less likely to email someone a link or forward it using the phone – cutting and pasting is out of the question, and even the usual “share” options are too much trouble. The “comments” that the regulars leave may not be seen on a phone without some determined effort, and you might not even think of leaving your own comment when using the phone.

But the real problem is the “long-form” nature of GOML. The reason people prefer Twitter to anything longer is partly that their attention span has been eroded by all the stimuli of our connected world, and partly because they’re busy and only read stuff on their phone while on the go. Long form + smart phone = meh.

Hell, I get bored just writing this stuff half the time – I totally understand why someone wouldn’t take the time to read it on a larger screen, much less a hand-held.

I had lunch the other day with an old friend from school days who said he’d been reading the blog and enjoyed it (Hey, Mouse, that’s you!).  I asked him if he shared any of it with his wife and he said she was so busy that she hardly had time even to talk to him, and that something like GOML just wouldn’t fit in. It’s too much of a commitment for most people.

I’ve had people tell me “I don’t read much any more” when I’ve tried to interest them in GOML. I suppose that could just be a polite way of saying they don’t really care about my particular take on things, but I’d rather blame smartphones.

Anyway, I’m sick of writing this now – I think I’ll go flip through Twitter for five minutes.

 

Trump attacks knowledge

The Environmental Protection Agency, under its new head, climate change denier Scott Pruitt, has explained that it  wants “to take as inclusive an approach to regulation as possible.”

To make this happen, they have dismissed five academic scientists from a major scientific review board and will replace them with representatives from the industries whose pollution the E.P.A. is supposed to regulate.

epa

Pruitt, Trump, and Coal Miners – life is good

According to the Failing New York Times,

President Trump has directed Mr. Pruitt to radically remake the E.P.A., pushing for deep cuts in its budget — including a 40 percent reduction for its main scientific branch — and instructing him to roll back major Obama-era regulations on climate change and clean water protection. In recent weeks, the agency has removed some scientific data on climate change from its websites, and Mr. Pruitt has publicly questioned the established science of human-caused climate change.

Ken Kimmell, the president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said, “This is completely part of a multifaceted effort to get science out of the way of a deregulation agenda.”

Just a quick reminder to you all: we’re only about 6% through the first four years of this nightmare clown-show.

In other news, former president Barack Obama accepted a “Profiles in Courage” award at the J.F.K. Library in Boston on Sunday.

profiles

He has chosen to refuse the many requests he’s had to directly confront Trump on his agenda of reversing every initiative of the Obama administration, most importantly the recent idiotic “Repeal and Replace” effort now underway to deny tens of millions of Americans access to healthcare, so that the very rich can be just a little richer.

He explained that “To weigh in would be a violation of his duty as a past president to let his successor operate without hindrance from him.” If only his successor would grant him the same consideration!

In accepting the Profiles in Courage Award, which has also been given to George H.W. Bush, John McCain, and Gerald Ford, among others, Obama did say,

“It takes little courage to aid those who are already powerful, already comfortable, already influential, but it takes great courage to champion the vulnerable and the sick and the infirm.”

Courage and knowledge vs. cowardice and ignorance? Dignity and composure vs. dishonor and vulgarity? Competence vs. ineptitude?

The American people have made their choices.

Vive La France

“There is not a French culture, there is a culture in France and it is diverse.”

That’s what Emmanuel Macron, the centrist candidate favored to be the next President of France, said at a rally in Lyon the other day.  Both the extreme right and the extreme left in France hate globalization and its effects, including the dilution of what they think being “French” entails, so the centrist position amounts to “there is no “French'”.

Yeah, no.

I think we all understand that to be a meaningless slogan designed to garner votes by appealing to recent immigrants, those who would prefer not to be labelled “racist”, or those who want to send a message to Marine Le Pen by rejecting her position that there is a “French culture” and that she’ll decide who’s in and who’s not.

 

marine

Either way, tomorrow France will have a new President with no prior experience and no base of support in government. As the NYT puts it,

Neither has ever held national elected office. Each lacks any real base of support in Parliament and will be trying to build one from the ground up. The president of France is powerful only if he or she has a majority in Parliament to help push through his or her party’s program.

There are a lot of similarities between this election and our recent election, most disturbingly the revelation last night of massive Russian hacking of Macron organization emails, apparently with the goal of aiding Le Pen and sowing doubt about the legitimacy of the whole electoral process.

You can also point to a lot of similarities between Le Pen’s candidacy and Trump’s in terms of what she’s been saying and who she appeals to. Maybe she’ll be a surprise winner like Trump, and maybe she’ll have trouble implementing her ideas without more support, like Trump. Unlike Trump, who doesn’t actually believe in anything except himself, she does seem to be a “true believer”. I’m not really sure which is scarier.

And, as with our election, many voters are voting not for one candidate but against the other.

Another thing that is similar is the disaffection of many younger voters. This quote reminds me of one I highlighted in this early blog entry about Bernie voters:

 “I didn’t know about the (email) leaks but now that I know about it, it won’t change my vote,” said Audrey Payet, a 33-year-old day care worker, in central Paris. She said she planned on abstaining because she did not want to choose between “a racist party and a banker party.”

Good thinking, Audrey. You shall have the government you deserve, just like the rest of us.

À demain!